SUNDAY NFL FOOTBALL
Russel Okung is also missing from the defense which now has bigger hole up the middle the size of Lindsey Lohan’s.
I am not a statistician, but I do have a graduate degree in political science, and did have to take advanced statistics at the university of virginia to get my masters....but it was a lot of years ago!
I agree about the grammar flags....they did jump out at me. But hey, stats majors don't do a lot of writing, so I am going to give Bryce the benefit of the doubt on this count.
I think his computation on # of plays of 3500 starting with 1,000 and running up to 500k over 5 years is based on the compounding of 4% per wager. If I interpreted was he was suggesting correctly, it would mean each wager would be 4% of existing bankroll. Assuming winning percentage, then that 4% wager would theoretically continue to increase. I am not interested enough to try and figure out the theoretical math, but just thought I would throw my 2 pennies in 
Theory is theory, but then you have to pick a winning percentage! So I am with Grinder...let's give Bryce a chance and see how he does. If nothing else, it opens up interesting discussion. Meanwhile, I am going to try and pick some winners today! Go Titans (favorite pick of the day!) LOL
Bryce_Bell is randizzle
I hope he is , randizzle was off the meat rack
he had one great run in College Foots, thats it
I am on all his bets, with the exception of the colts/texans, the line at my book was too far off, but I took all the others. I haven't followed much NFL this season (been betting all NCAAF), figure at the very worst he can't know less than me, even if he is getting his information from somewhere else.
As far as Im concerned If I win, I could care less about anything else...
Besides most of his picks are on TV today, and Im a well documented action junkie...
Bryce_Bell is randizzle
I hope he is , randizzle was off the meat rack
Miami Dolphins -3
Detroit Lions Chicago Bears Under 44
Cincinnati Bengals New England Patriots Under 44.5
Indianapolis Colts @ Houston Texans Under 49
San Francisco 49ers -3
Green Bay Packers -3
Green Bay Packers Philadelphia Eagles Under 48.5
LOCKED AND LOADED ....BOL 
I am not a statistician, but I do have a graduate degree in political science, and did have to take advanced statistics at the university of virginia to get my masters....but it was a lot of years ago!
I agree about the grammar flags....they did jump out at me. But hey, stats majors don't do a lot of writing, so I am going to give Bryce the benefit of the doubt on this count.
I think his computation on # of plays of 3500 starting with 1,000 and running up to 500k over 5 years is based on the compounding of 4% per wager. If I interpreted was he was suggesting correctly, it would mean each wager would be 4% of existing bankroll. Assuming winning percentage, then that 4% wager would theoretically continue to increase. I am not interested enough to try and figure out the theoretical math, but just thought I would throw my 2 pennies in
Theory is theory, but then you have to pick a winning percentage! So I am with Grinder...let's give Bryce a chance and see how he does. If nothing else, it opens up interesting discussion. Meanwhile, I am going to try and pick some winners today! Go Titans (favorite pick of the day!) LOL
Agreed...he is writing long detailed analysis...it's highly possible to slip off a key or get a master degree brain fart here and there..
This is sports betting and NOT rocket science ...
It is very simple ... When you see lopsided action on any given game, SIDE WITH THE BOOK!!
That is, IF the name of the game is "evening the action" ... Which it is!
IF you can't beat them, and trust me,, you can't!!
Check the ego at the door and join them ...
~peace
Established in 1995,
TOTAL NO CLASS move.
Hot Forum Topics
