Posted:
#376
The only Ivy League school this mate went to was Wrigley - with all the drunken teachers that called in sick.
0
The Kids From M.I.T. Beat Blackjack, This Kid From Cornell Is Going To Beat Sports Betting.
Posted:
#383
Quote Originally Posted by Bryce_Bell:
Also, for those of you who like to get your action over with early. There is a system regarding underdogs on the road early in the season in the first quarter. With all dogs at least getting +0.5 in the first quarter or better, low scores usually means a field goal or touchdown in the first quarter by the underdog secures the victory. I will not disclose this system because I can not document these plays on a tracking website. I will post these for those who wish to observe and or follow.
How many times does this arguement need to be brought up. I think this is the third or fourth time now.
Tonight there will be a play on MINNESOTA VIKINGS +0.5 1ST QUARTER.
In recap,
MINNESOTA NEW ORLEANS UNDER 49 (-110)
MINNESOTA VIKINGS +0.5 1ST QUARTER
0
Posted:
#384
you know DAMN WELL as do all of us here, that if the Vikings covered the first quarter, it would have counted as a play.
Mods are watching you, and if you don't want to be looked at as a "potential tout" , I suggest you dont act like 1
"shaving" a record is very toutlike
If you are such a great handicapper, what is 1 more loss in the grand scheme of things.
You can still have plays on "stale" lines that are no longer available 
By the way.....
Do you post at any other sports forums, or are we the only ones to receive your plays?
0
Posted:
#385
Quote Originally Posted by Bryce_Bell:
First Week, High Totals? Be wary over players. Teams that come into the season looking to make a big bang in week one lighting up the score board are not usually the teams that are set by the odds makers to do so. A system well known by gamblers is play the under in totals higher then 42 in week one. I will take it a step further. Along my journey I was introduced to the system of playing week one games under the total if in fact the total is higher then 44 points. If we look at this system dating back to the start of the 1999 season the UNDER in Week One Games with a total HIGHER THEN 44 POINTS has gone 37-18. For those of you who like the winning percentage side of things, that’s 67% over the past 10 seasons. Now, to make things even better for you winning percentage junkies, this system has been even better since the boom of online sports betting in the early 2000’s. Since the start of the 2003 season, following this same system, you would of cashed your ticket at the betting window 27 of 36 times! That is a very nice 75% winning percentage that will definitely pad your wallet early in the season. To make things even better, this system is currently on a 17-3 85% run dating back to 2005!
This system is so affective because the book knows that generally speaking the public bettors love playing overs. I won’t lie, I love playing overs as well, but because of this, you must be careful when backing this publically loved bets. Early in the season, bettors have not seen a football game in nearly 6 months and are ready to rear up and fire away. These lines have been hyped up since early in the summer and there have been weeks and weeks of previews on ESPN, Websites and in Magazines. These previews are almost always more offensively focused then defensively focused, because the players the people want to hear about are the star players in the skill positions. This creates a large cloud of “offense-itis” among bettors. Put two seemingly explosive teams in a game set up for a week one shootout...except low scores.
How did this system do last season? Well going into last season the system was on a 12-1 run. If you have done the quick math you can see it went 5-2 just a year ago. However, of those five wins were all by double digits. It’s no secret, defences come together quicker then offenses. Offensive football is all about timing and rhythm. This may take a team a quarter, a game or many weeks in the case of some, forever.
There are a number of games which could qualify for the system this week but it all starts tonight with Minnesota New Orleans. I am locked in at UNDER 49 POINTS.
Also, for those of you who like to get your action over with early. There is a system regarding underdogs on the road early in the season in the first quarter. With all dogs at least getting +0.5 in the first quarter or better, low scores usually means a field goal or touchdown in the first quarter by the underdog secures the victory. I will not disclose this system because I can not document these plays on a tracking website. I will post these for those who wish to observe and or follow.
Tonight there will be a play on MINNESOTA VIKINGS +0.5 1ST QUARTER.
In recap,
MINNESOTA NEW ORLEANS UNDER 49 (-110)
MINNESOTA VIKINGS +0.5 1ST QUARTER
if this is not the biggest tout line leave me hanging then I'm the King of England
the more I re-read this, it sounds just like a tout info-commercial on the radio here in vegas, all the same lines
what a fucking clown ..................
0
Posted:
#387
I feel that the purpose of this forum is to educate each other as much as possible so that we can all be better informed to make smarter plays. And I think that involves pointing out good advice or bets, and also bad advice or bets. With that in mind, I say this not to be negative, but to make sure people are cautious with this guys advice.
Signs this guy is a Square:
1) Plays multiple road favorites - a
2) Plays the Sunday night game at the last minute - (Taking the Road Favorite) a
3) Plays the most popular games on the board - a
4) Thinks the W-L record in pre-season is something worth noticing - a
5) States his personal opinion as if it's an absolute - a
6) Gives excuses for why a game didn't cover as if that makes the loss justified - a
7) Claims that Vegas insiders freely give out information to Cornell Statistics major that are writing a book - a
8) Thinks that a Stats Degree compensates for years of experience and inside information - a
again though, this is just my opinion.
BOL to everyone
0
Posted:
#389
Quote Originally Posted by 5_for_Fighting:
next signs this guy is a tout:
Will make 3 picks on tonights games a
Lines will be at least .5 points off
Will bet at least 30 games this week ( average 4+ games a day )
Will go about 30-45 % in next week
Will claim this place is jinxing him
Will leave
next signs this guy is a tout:
Will make 3 picks on tonights games a
Lines will be at least .5 points off
Will bet at least 30 games this week ( average 4+ games a day )
Will go about 30-45 % in next week
Will claim this place is jinxing him
Will leave
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=41&sub=100822915&page=1
0
Posted:
#393
Quote Originally Posted by Bryce_Bell:
7-5 NFL
4-2 CFB
11-7 Overall.
Thanks for keeping track though.
I have been to the Caribbean and throughout Nevada talking and learning from the best bookmakers and the sharpest bettors. I have been given a tremendous inside look at how the book and small percentage of professional gamblers come out in the green, week after week. I have combined both sides of the equation and developed, Big Red’s Guide to Beating the Book.
Okay, I'm convinced. How much for your book?
0
52976 views
Posted:
#395
Quote Originally Posted by 5_for_Fighting:
next signs this guy is a tout:
Will make 3 picks on tonights games
Lines will be at least .5 points off
Will bet at least 30 games this week ( average 4+ games a day )
Will go about 30-45 % in next week
Will claim this plaim is jinxing him
Will leave
next signs this guy is a tout:
Will make 3 picks on tonights games
Lines will be at least .5 points off
Will bet at least 30 games this week ( average 4+ games a day )
Will go about 30-45 % in next week
Will claim this plaim is jinxing him
Will leave
forgot
F5 the thread at least 200 times a day to make it look like this poster has a following a
0
Posted:
#397
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
what is funny is fuckheads like bryce_bell or whoever he really is telling people that they need to get a lifemeanwhile he spends all day behind his computer creating aliases for an army and bumping up his own threads. that is just fucking sad.
what is funny is fuckheads like bryce_bell or whoever he really is telling people that they need to get a life
meanwhile he spends all day behind his computer creating aliases for an army and bumping up his own threads. that is just fucking sad. google the thread title.
I don't want to get in trouble for posting a link to another website, but, you will see we are not the only site to receive his pearls of wisdom....
OR
call him on his bullshit
0
Posted:
#400
Quote Originally Posted by 5_for_Fighting:
google the thread title.
I don't want to get in trouble for posting a link to another website, but, you will see we are not the only site to receive his pearls of wisdom....
OR
call him on his bullshit
Wow... Just wow. This guy posted this crap on all of those sites? One guy even busted him on the handicapping magazine article that he plagersied that all from. And this guy said that "I" need to get a life?
The thread he posted in the one site basically went down just like this one. Even if Bryce is legit and was never planning on selling picks, copying thoughts for a play word for word is kind of sad.
0
Hot Forum Topics
