I'd like a slice of Scal's brain to eat. Considering it's never been used and has no ridges in it, it's probably as smooth, rich, buttery and as succulent as the finest veal or foie gras. Couple that with some Fava beans and a nice Chianti....
FTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTTFT!!!!!!!
But, I'm guessing the rest of him would be tough grisly dark meat that somehow used to be white meat but was guilted and shamed into changing.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
They want to "Silence of the Lambs" you.
I'd like a slice of Scal's brain to eat. Considering it's never been used and has no ridges in it, it's probably as smooth, rich, buttery and as succulent as the finest veal or foie gras. Couple that with some Fava beans and a nice Chianti....
FTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTTFT!!!!!!!
But, I'm guessing the rest of him would be tough grisly dark meat that somehow used to be white meat but was guilted and shamed into changing.....
How much money did you cause people to lose by forcing everyone to follow your Hillary Clinton 2016 wager? How much did you lose? Its remarkable that you havent offed yourself after all your epic losses
Can you post one thread where Hillary was a play I'll wait. Just one...
While you're at it, post the Roy Moore political prop bet I won. Oh, you won't because you don't even know who the fu** that is! Because you just cap TENNIS. Lol.
Cue the frozen caveman lawyer music!
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
How much money did you cause people to lose by forcing everyone to follow your Hillary Clinton 2016 wager? How much did you lose? Its remarkable that you havent offed yourself after all your epic losses
Can you post one thread where Hillary was a play I'll wait. Just one...
While you're at it, post the Roy Moore political prop bet I won. Oh, you won't because you don't even know who the fu** that is! Because you just cap TENNIS. Lol.
3 hours and counting from the end of Texas +9 covering despite being down 20-0 in the 2nd q.....we are all waiting for a classic Scal post where he criticizes a winning play, and how he claims his Tennessee pick was better because of his 2 day long speech called a write up...because in his own words, people here would prefer to lose following one of his epic write ups, rather than win tailing a 55% capper without much reasoning behind the pick (little does Scal the twat realize that the peoples champ Pack has a very tight group of cappers who he pm's directly about deeper capping angles, than spend an entire week like Scal does fluffering his own thread in the mains, jacking off to it with every passing 1000 views)....and lets not bring up BYU or Detmer as theit qb from weeks ago...hes still very bitter about a loss he thought was an excellent cap
Packers you're going to finish .500 and leave the site.
Every time you are at .500 or below it (which is every day) you rush to throw in a coin flip bet. And the timing of your posts reveals this. It happens EVERY WEEKEND. You are an action junkie coin flipping bettor that no one cares about or tails. In fact, I'll bet 90% of this forum that hates me would take me over you every day of the week.
Because you are irrelevant and keep repeating yourself. You're picks have nothing to them. The Temple play was an enormous miss. The South Carolina play magically came right after I posted a play fading your KC play (hence you fade me), then you rush to the window when you see you'll be .500 for the 10,000th time and put the Texas play through. Genius. I'm sure you had a 17-0 comeback capped the entire way. LOL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
3 hours and counting from the end of Texas +9 covering despite being down 20-0 in the 2nd q.....we are all waiting for a classic Scal post where he criticizes a winning play, and how he claims his Tennessee pick was better because of his 2 day long speech called a write up...because in his own words, people here would prefer to lose following one of his epic write ups, rather than win tailing a 55% capper without much reasoning behind the pick (little does Scal the twat realize that the peoples champ Pack has a very tight group of cappers who he pm's directly about deeper capping angles, than spend an entire week like Scal does fluffering his own thread in the mains, jacking off to it with every passing 1000 views)....and lets not bring up BYU or Detmer as theit qb from weeks ago...hes still very bitter about a loss he thought was an excellent cap
Packers you're going to finish .500 and leave the site.
Every time you are at .500 or below it (which is every day) you rush to throw in a coin flip bet. And the timing of your posts reveals this. It happens EVERY WEEKEND. You are an action junkie coin flipping bettor that no one cares about or tails. In fact, I'll bet 90% of this forum that hates me would take me over you every day of the week.
Because you are irrelevant and keep repeating yourself. You're picks have nothing to them. The Temple play was an enormous miss. The South Carolina play magically came right after I posted a play fading your KC play (hence you fade me), then you rush to the window when you see you'll be .500 for the 10,000th time and put the Texas play through. Genius. I'm sure you had a 17-0 comeback capped the entire way. LOL!
Packers your posts have become redundant and frankly incredibly boring. Do you really think ONE PERSON on this site thinks you're a better capper than me? ONE? In all seriousness? You're an action junkie. You'll finish 10-10. It's all coin flips with you. No reasoning. No write-ups. Just random plays you know nothing about. Finish out your 20 picks. You're leaving.
Pick #11 -
Boston +3 over Cavaliers
0
Packers your posts have become redundant and frankly incredibly boring. Do you really think ONE PERSON on this site thinks you're a better capper than me? ONE? In all seriousness? You're an action junkie. You'll finish 10-10. It's all coin flips with you. No reasoning. No write-ups. Just random plays you know nothing about. Finish out your 20 picks. You're leaving.
I see Scal is still falsifying his record over in the CFB forum
At this point, I can't comment anymore on this. This is the same poster who would 'report back' to Hugh on my record. Literally. On a gambling website a grown man acted like a underling. Now you know why I'm here to dispatch of them.
Grown men masturbating to my record day in day out. And it's ALWAYS NOT the one I type (even though EVERY thread contains a record up top). It's truly incredible. The same bullshi* day in day out, like you are in an insane asylum.
This is the same guy who doesn't even know what a lookahead line is....
0
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
I see Scal is still falsifying his record over in the CFB forum
At this point, I can't comment anymore on this. This is the same poster who would 'report back' to Hugh on my record. Literally. On a gambling website a grown man acted like a underling. Now you know why I'm here to dispatch of them.
Grown men masturbating to my record day in day out. And it's ALWAYS NOT the one I type (even though EVERY thread contains a record up top). It's truly incredible. The same bullshi* day in day out, like you are in an insane asylum.
This is the same guy who doesn't even know what a lookahead line is....
Wow. This packers dude is obsessed. Try to get out a little bro. Big world out there.
Scal: tenn loss was disappointing. Cost me a lot of money. Hopefully we get them back today. Who is your NFL today?
Steelers +4
and
Pats -9
What can I say about Tennessee? Their opening three drives could have been TD"s and all 3 were FG's. Do that and you will get fu**ed in the end. One TD and we likely cover. They couldn't punch it in. Very disappointed as I lost as well. Game went well for 2.5 quarters but to get shut out in the second half: unacceptable...Very pist...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jeromewdetroit:
Wow. This packers dude is obsessed. Try to get out a little bro. Big world out there.
Scal: tenn loss was disappointing. Cost me a lot of money. Hopefully we get them back today. Who is your NFL today?
Steelers +4
and
Pats -9
What can I say about Tennessee? Their opening three drives could have been TD"s and all 3 were FG's. Do that and you will get fu**ed in the end. One TD and we likely cover. They couldn't punch it in. Very disappointed as I lost as well. Game went well for 2.5 quarters but to get shut out in the second half: unacceptable...Very pist...
So after Hugh wins this challenge do both Scal and Packer have to leave or is it Scal vs both? Just curious, personally I don;t think there is any chance that Scal will stick to the agreement.
0
So after Hugh wins this challenge do both Scal and Packer have to leave or is it Scal vs both? Just curious, personally I don;t think there is any chance that Scal will stick to the agreement.
What can I say about Tennessee? Their opening three drives could have been TD"s and all 3 were FG's. Do that and you will get fu**ed in the end. One TD and we likely cover. They couldn't punch it in. Very disappointed as I lost as well. Game went well for 2.5 quarters but to get shut out in the second half: unacceptable...Very pist...
It was just a bad pick. I'm not saying I think you were on the wrong side. What I mean is it was just a bad game to wager on. -2.5 means even the oddsmakers were saying it could've gone either way. It also means the Cox would've probably been favored on a neutral site though I don't necessarily believe that. I think this contest is throwing you off of your game and making you second guess yourself. Purdue is like 5-1 ATS yet have you picked them in contest once? Instead you're picking Tennessee -2.5? Come the f*ck on? Stop bickering with everyone, stop bickering with me, and handle your sh*t.
BOL on your NFL picks. I don't agree with them but BOL anyway. I may joke with Packers and Hugh, and I may argue with you, but I don't have a favorite in this contest. I think the best man should win.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Steelers +4
and
Pats -9
What can I say about Tennessee? Their opening three drives could have been TD"s and all 3 were FG's. Do that and you will get fu**ed in the end. One TD and we likely cover. They couldn't punch it in. Very disappointed as I lost as well. Game went well for 2.5 quarters but to get shut out in the second half: unacceptable...Very pist...
It was just a bad pick. I'm not saying I think you were on the wrong side. What I mean is it was just a bad game to wager on. -2.5 means even the oddsmakers were saying it could've gone either way. It also means the Cox would've probably been favored on a neutral site though I don't necessarily believe that. I think this contest is throwing you off of your game and making you second guess yourself. Purdue is like 5-1 ATS yet have you picked them in contest once? Instead you're picking Tennessee -2.5? Come the f*ck on? Stop bickering with everyone, stop bickering with me, and handle your sh*t.
BOL on your NFL picks. I don't agree with them but BOL anyway. I may joke with Packers and Hugh, and I may argue with you, but I don't have a favorite in this contest. I think the best man should win.
So after Hugh wins this challenge do both Scal and Packer have to leave or is it Scal vs both? Just curious, personally I don;t think there is any chance that Scal will stick to the agreement.
It's Scal vs both but if Hugh beats Scal and Scal beats Packers, Scal and Packers both leave. And so forth
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:
So after Hugh wins this challenge do both Scal and Packer have to leave or is it Scal vs both? Just curious, personally I don;t think there is any chance that Scal will stick to the agreement.
It's Scal vs both but if Hugh beats Scal and Scal beats Packers, Scal and Packers both leave. And so forth
FTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTTFT!!!!!!!
has a very tight group of cappers who he pm's directly about deeper capping angles, than spend an entire week like Scal does fluffering his own thread in the mains, jacking off to it with every passing 1000 views)....and lets not bring up BYU or Detmer as theit qb from weeks ago...hes still very bitter about a loss he thought was an excellent cap 
Established in 1995,
on 44 as we speak
Hot Forum Topics
