^^ I notice Coldsnap (Scal's bu#-slam buddy BTW) who seems to be the resident lurker/recordkeeper/etc. has down-to-the-penny records on BWS, but hasn't discredited the People's Champ or Hugh's posted numbers referring to Scal's - let's say - sub-par "Decade Of Dominance".....
As "Wolfgang The N@zi" from Laugh-In would say:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krD4hdGvGHM
Verrrry Interesting.....
And I noticed [ once again ] that you come to BWS's rescue even though you will deny it as usual, even though you know those numbers don't lie. I guess it is because you prefer to follow and be part of a herd than accept the truth about one of your fellow internet groupies.
I understand why you post so often in THIS thread......because you failed TWICE betting against SCAL.......Lucky for you that you didn't have the to bet your Covers life cause you lost both times.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GimmeMoneyNow:
^^ I notice Coldsnap (Scal's bu#-slam buddy BTW) who seems to be the resident lurker/recordkeeper/etc. has down-to-the-penny records on BWS, but hasn't discredited the People's Champ or Hugh's posted numbers referring to Scal's - let's say - sub-par "Decade Of Dominance".....
As "Wolfgang The N@zi" from Laugh-In would say:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krD4hdGvGHM
Verrrry Interesting.....
And I noticed [ once again ] that you come to BWS's rescue even though you will deny it as usual, even though you know those numbers don't lie. I guess it is because you prefer to follow and be part of a herd than accept the truth about one of your fellow internet groupies.
I understand why you post so often in THIS thread......because you failed TWICE betting against SCAL.......Lucky for you that you didn't have the to bet your Covers life cause you lost both times.
BWS not judging you or trying to make you look bad but are those numbers above correct? If you don’t answer the question that’s fine because it would stay with the theme of this thread. Again not trying to shame you in any way.
100% CORRECT
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
BWS not judging you or trying to make you look bad but are those numbers above correct? If you don’t answer the question that’s fine because it would stay with the theme of this thread. Again not trying to shame you in any way.
You're right! It would stay within the theme of this thread:
WMI will not answer what he would do if I called him a 40% capper with no evidence.
sHugh will not provide any proof for the 8 years of capping.
Gimmee would not provide WL records for any of his claims yet miraculously they all match Hugh after the fact.
I love how trolls make backhanded comments and deride their own ilk.
What's amazing about Cold Snaps posts is that he's been incredibly detailed this entire thread and if there was a dispute it was a game or two (not lessening the overall theme of BWS's losing).
Yet you STILL need to ask BWS himself if it's true.
I mean, what day you think he's going to say? "You caught me red handed!"
The obtuseness and obstinance in this thread shows why their all 50% capper and why they'll never have two YEARS of 62% and 70%. They won't even sniff it. I mean the guy has to cheat to win for god's sake. So many enablers here.
0
You're right! It would stay within the theme of this thread:
WMI will not answer what he would do if I called him a 40% capper with no evidence.
sHugh will not provide any proof for the 8 years of capping.
Gimmee would not provide WL records for any of his claims yet miraculously they all match Hugh after the fact.
I love how trolls make backhanded comments and deride their own ilk.
What's amazing about Cold Snaps posts is that he's been incredibly detailed this entire thread and if there was a dispute it was a game or two (not lessening the overall theme of BWS's losing).
Yet you STILL need to ask BWS himself if it's true.
I mean, what day you think he's going to say? "You caught me red handed!"
The obtuseness and obstinance in this thread shows why their all 50% capper and why they'll never have two YEARS of 62% and 70%. They won't even sniff it. I mean the guy has to cheat to win for god's sake. So many enablers here.
you just couldn't wait to use obtuseness and obstinance in one sentence could you?
I know, right? Then he uses "their" instead of "they're" in the same post. And we all know that he knows the difference. When Scal's in the zone he doesn't just needlessly flex the lexicon. He proof reads. When he's off of his game he goes 6-11, still talks a bunch of sh*t, and typos words.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
you just couldn't wait to use obtuseness and obstinance in one sentence could you?
I know, right? Then he uses "their" instead of "they're" in the same post. And we all know that he knows the difference. When Scal's in the zone he doesn't just needlessly flex the lexicon. He proof reads. When he's off of his game he goes 6-11, still talks a bunch of sh*t, and typos words.
And I noticed [ once again ] that you come to BWS's rescue even though you will deny it as usual, even though you know those numbers don't lie. I guess it is because you prefer to follow and be part of a herd than accept the truth about one of your fellow internet groupies.
I understand why you post so often in THIS thread......because you failed TWICE betting against SCAL.......Lucky for you that you didn't have the to bet your Covers life cause you lost both times.
WHOOPS!!!
Sorry guys, I apologize!
Thought I posted my previous post in the thread where BWS claims to be a lifetime 70% capper with "thousands of silent lurkers" who hang on his every capping word, yet lost a contest by going 35%.....
Oh, wait, that doesn't exist???
Oh yeah, and "once again" our resident stalker/fact checker/record keeper STILL has not denied the People's Champ's or The Hugh's claims of Scal's lifetime sub 40% record.....
Thank you, good night.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:
And I noticed [ once again ] that you come to BWS's rescue even though you will deny it as usual, even though you know those numbers don't lie. I guess it is because you prefer to follow and be part of a herd than accept the truth about one of your fellow internet groupies.
I understand why you post so often in THIS thread......because you failed TWICE betting against SCAL.......Lucky for you that you didn't have the to bet your Covers life cause you lost both times.
WHOOPS!!!
Sorry guys, I apologize!
Thought I posted my previous post in the thread where BWS claims to be a lifetime 70% capper with "thousands of silent lurkers" who hang on his every capping word, yet lost a contest by going 35%.....
Oh, wait, that doesn't exist???
Oh yeah, and "once again" our resident stalker/fact checker/record keeper STILL has not denied the People's Champ's or The Hugh's claims of Scal's lifetime sub 40% record.....
More hypocrisy from Donny Jr - The guy bashes more people, cusses out more people, lies more than most people and insults more people having the balls to make the dumbass comments above.
Whose in chains right now for doing these very things?
Donny Jr - Hands down the most childish person in this thread. Cries about everything. Hands out more insults than anyone
Again, what ADULT types repeatedly
"I can’t....I really can’t!"
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
More hypocrisy from Donny Jr - The guy bashes more people, cusses out more people, lies more than most people and insults more people having the balls to make the dumbass comments above.
Whose in chains right now for doing these very things?
Donny Jr - Hands down the most childish person in this thread. Cries about everything. Hands out more insults than anyone
No they are grammar trolling. Folks, you know they’ve reached the bottom of their intellectual barrel when they grammar troll.
See, the art of comedy is nuance.
If ya see a an overweight guy in the audience heckling you, don’t say, “Who are you fat boy!?”
It’s low culture, childish, sophomoric and infantile.
Anyone can say it. Be unique with your insults.
Seriously. You have no idea how bad you look when you grasp for such things.
It’s one dozen on one here! I write 12 times the posts of each poster and they....grammar troll. Yup.
Don’t try out to be a comedian. You’ll get the hook ASAP.
Do something with your lives people. THINK. ACT. CAP. Be UNIQUE.
I can’t....I really can’t!
For you to use the words obstinance and obtuseness in the same sentence and then follow it up with "their" instead of "they're" is just funny, because you obviously are trying to come off as smarter than everyone else...no one here cares to be your grammar police...you are always the punchline of every joke in this thread...you always have been, and always will be this sites biggest joke...this thread goes to prove it, and will for all eternity...as will your capping skills from 2006 and 2014 as seen in post 2716
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Lifetime 70% capper? I’ve said that????
Interesting.
No they are grammar trolling. Folks, you know they’ve reached the bottom of their intellectual barrel when they grammar troll.
See, the art of comedy is nuance.
If ya see a an overweight guy in the audience heckling you, don’t say, “Who are you fat boy!?”
It’s low culture, childish, sophomoric and infantile.
Anyone can say it. Be unique with your insults.
Seriously. You have no idea how bad you look when you grasp for such things.
It’s one dozen on one here! I write 12 times the posts of each poster and they....grammar troll. Yup.
Don’t try out to be a comedian. You’ll get the hook ASAP.
Do something with your lives people. THINK. ACT. CAP. Be UNIQUE.
I can’t....I really can’t!
For you to use the words obstinance and obtuseness in the same sentence and then follow it up with "their" instead of "they're" is just funny, because you obviously are trying to come off as smarter than everyone else...no one here cares to be your grammar police...you are always the punchline of every joke in this thread...you always have been, and always will be this sites biggest joke...this thread goes to prove it, and will for all eternity...as will your capping skills from 2006 and 2014 as seen in post 2716
Fyi...no heterosexual male has ever been heard saying or seen writing the following phrase:
"I cant...I really cant"....especially in italics, bold, and in flamingly gaay font colors
...not that theres anything wrong with it if you are gaay, but dont try to come off here as a straight macho male when you clearly are not, and have been repeatedly proven to be a fan of ballsacs, based solely on your own posts and comments.
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Fyi...no heterosexual male has ever been heard saying or seen writing the following phrase:
"I cant...I really cant"....especially in italics, bold, and in flamingly gaay font colors
...not that theres anything wrong with it if you are gaay, but dont try to come off here as a straight macho male when you clearly are not, and have been repeatedly proven to be a fan of ballsacs, based solely on your own posts and comments.
Its really a shame Scal how you are dealing with your last few weeks here...the optics you are creating as your life continues to spiral out of control are really a bad look for you....i realize you are the most delusional person here, so thats why the peoples champ Pack is required to let you know this...you have to think more about your legacy now...nothing else....do you want to be remembered as a sad alias fukk creator like your failed Jerome, or the more recent pathetic attempt in Begginerboy (how ironic you want to be his friend and call him BB...as you are a purist in the sodomy lifestyle and only do things bare up the back)...regardless what you have done in the past Scal, think of today as your next opportunity to turn things around in your covers life, regain whatever small amount of dignity you can for this persona, and just hope Hugh and myself allow your memory here to rest in peace after February 4th 2018.
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Its really a shame Scal how you are dealing with your last few weeks here...the optics you are creating as your life continues to spiral out of control are really a bad look for you....i realize you are the most delusional person here, so thats why the peoples champ Pack is required to let you know this...you have to think more about your legacy now...nothing else....do you want to be remembered as a sad alias fukk creator like your failed Jerome, or the more recent pathetic attempt in Begginerboy (how ironic you want to be his friend and call him BB...as you are a purist in the sodomy lifestyle and only do things bare up the back)...regardless what you have done in the past Scal, think of today as your next opportunity to turn things around in your covers life, regain whatever small amount of dignity you can for this persona, and just hope Hugh and myself allow your memory here to rest in peace after February 4th 2018.
Scal is not smart enough to understand the true meaning of a cap off...he thinks %'s matter when the loser leaves forever...i am saddened i didnt go 7-13, and be able to laugh at you forever that you went 6-14 and still couldnt beat the peoples champ
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Scal is not smart enough to understand the true meaning of a cap off...he thinks %'s matter when the loser leaves forever...i am saddened i didnt go 7-13, and be able to laugh at you forever that you went 6-14 and still couldnt beat the peoples champ
Wmi...the peoples champ is actually 9-8 in football picks, with a few obvious tankjobs to keep this thread interesting...he also dumped 2 picks on suspicious tennis wagers, again, just for drama sake within this cap off....so in fact, the peoples champ should really be 9-5 currently if it wasnt for the theatre of this thread...but if the peoples champ didnt play the role as puppetmaster here within this cap off, this would have been over a month ago...but for overall historical purposes when we all look back and wonder what ever happened to Scalabrine, yes, the peoples champ final record will be 10-10...50%....not bad for an amateur football capper, stepping up to the plate, and taking out the garbage of this site where no one else in the history of covers was ever able to accomplish...the peoples champ legacy - ultimate clean up guy
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Wmi...the peoples champ is actually 9-8 in football picks, with a few obvious tankjobs to keep this thread interesting...he also dumped 2 picks on suspicious tennis wagers, again, just for drama sake within this cap off....so in fact, the peoples champ should really be 9-5 currently if it wasnt for the theatre of this thread...but if the peoples champ didnt play the role as puppetmaster here within this cap off, this would have been over a month ago...but for overall historical purposes when we all look back and wonder what ever happened to Scalabrine, yes, the peoples champ final record will be 10-10...50%....not bad for an amateur football capper, stepping up to the plate, and taking out the garbage of this site where no one else in the history of covers was ever able to accomplish...the peoples champ legacy - ultimate clean up guy
No I’m saying that this entire thing started because Hugh and Packers got hot and bothered because I went 50% this year. I started the thread because of their constant trolling to rid the site of them.
And amazingly, Packers (under 50%) BWS (under 50%) and Hugh who if he doesn’t make his last pick is 50%....
Are all
BELOW OR AT 50%!!!
This doesn’t even mention the fact Hugh started a tracking thread on me where he had to drop out because he was under 50% in that thread too!
Hugh would you mind bumping that thread please? Lol!
0
Wmi,
No I’m saying that this entire thing started because Hugh and Packers got hot and bothered because I went 50% this year. I started the thread because of their constant trolling to rid the site of them.
And amazingly, Packers (under 50%) BWS (under 50%) and Hugh who if he doesn’t make his last pick is 50%....
Are all
BELOW OR AT 50%!!!
This doesn’t even mention the fact Hugh started a tracking thread on me where he had to drop out because he was under 50% in that thread too!
Hugh would you mind bumping that thread please? Lol!
"No I’m saying that this entire thing started because Hugh and Packers got hot and bothered because I went 50% this year. I started the thread because of their constant trolling to rid the site of them."
This is not the real reason this all started...dont continue to lie...come clean and tell everyone exactly how this cap off challenge came to be...and if you dont, Hugh and myself will
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Scal :
"No I’m saying that this entire thing started because Hugh and Packers got hot and bothered because I went 50% this year. I started the thread because of their constant trolling to rid the site of them."
This is not the real reason this all started...dont continue to lie...come clean and tell everyone exactly how this cap off challenge came to be...and if you dont, Hugh and myself will
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.