liking the rams too packers didnt look all that great in the first half last week... and their oline is banged up... plus 14 points is always a lot in the nfl...
i think GB wins SU but the rams hang around and get the cover
liking the rams too packers didnt look all that great in the first half last week... and their oline is banged up... plus 14 points is always a lot in the nfl...
i think GB wins SU but the rams hang around and get the cover
liking the rams too packers didnt look all that great in the first half last week... and their oline is banged up... plus 14 points is always a lot in the nfl...
i think GB wins SU but the rams hang around and get the cover
The more people mocking. the better chance to you win.
The more people mocking. the better chance to you win.
Professional1 - the people in this thread mocking the pick should only make you feel better about your selection. Personally, I love the play.
![]()
Couldn't agree more...may even play the ML
Its the games like these every year that just shock the league / public.
These guys are all professionals. Coming off a bye, desperate for a win, getting absolutely no respect as 14 approaching 15 point dogs. Only the biggest squares and most average joes will be playing the packers.
Wouldn't even be surprised if Matt Flynn plays the 2nd H and 2nd/3rd stringers start 2nd H to keep everyone fresh for Minn.
Only thing that worries me is the ego contest between GB and the Lions. Could be a very underrated factor that will lead to a GB blowout..
Professional1 - the people in this thread mocking the pick should only make you feel better about your selection. Personally, I love the play.
![]()
Couldn't agree more...may even play the ML
Its the games like these every year that just shock the league / public.
These guys are all professionals. Coming off a bye, desperate for a win, getting absolutely no respect as 14 approaching 15 point dogs. Only the biggest squares and most average joes will be playing the packers.
Wouldn't even be surprised if Matt Flynn plays the 2nd H and 2nd/3rd stringers start 2nd H to keep everyone fresh for Minn.
Only thing that worries me is the ego contest between GB and the Lions. Could be a very underrated factor that will lead to a GB blowout..
The Rams have the worst offense in the league; they may just get shut-out. This post is just like the one around the time this one came out where the guy says he's putting 5,000 on Green bay to cover - coming across as arrogant almost as if the game has been played already
I'm on neither side of this because a turnover here or a penalty there could mean everything either way when dealing with a number this big. The Rams coming off a bye and winless causes you to say, 'enough said'? Well rock on brotha but your rooting for a horrible team on both sides of the ball....if your gonna bet it lay the points if the number is 14...I thought it got bet up to 15 though
The Rams have the worst offense in the league; they may just get shut-out. This post is just like the one around the time this one came out where the guy says he's putting 5,000 on Green bay to cover - coming across as arrogant almost as if the game has been played already
I'm on neither side of this because a turnover here or a penalty there could mean everything either way when dealing with a number this big. The Rams coming off a bye and winless causes you to say, 'enough said'? Well rock on brotha but your rooting for a horrible team on both sides of the ball....if your gonna bet it lay the points if the number is 14...I thought it got bet up to 15 though
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
who's on a short week? not green bay
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
who's on a short week? not green bay
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
I dont make it a habit to bet BAD teams or to bet against GREAT teams. GB has made me lots of money this year, no way in hell IM betting against them, whatever the trend may be.
GL though cause Im staying away from this game
I dont make it a habit to bet BAD teams or to bet against GREAT teams. GB has made me lots of money this year, no way in hell IM betting against them, whatever the trend may be.
GL though cause Im staying away from this game
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
I dont know I have'nt tried to handicap a Chargers game all year because they just dont seem as dominant against the spread. So I don't understand what you mean. This reminds me of when teams would come into New England getting 17 points and still not cover. The Packers are basically the Patriots of those days because they do have a defense to go with it and the Rams are the slaughter....who the hell would want those points in this game and route for the Rams?....haha....Rodgers basically needs to catch a fever or this one is gonna be an embarassment
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
I dont know I have'nt tried to handicap a Chargers game all year because they just dont seem as dominant against the spread. So I don't understand what you mean. This reminds me of when teams would come into New England getting 17 points and still not cover. The Packers are basically the Patriots of those days because they do have a defense to go with it and the Rams are the slaughter....who the hell would want those points in this game and route for the Rams?....haha....Rodgers basically needs to catch a fever or this one is gonna be an embarassment
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
First of u little Maggot! I get pist easy or straight bash people often. But seriusly man you are one stupid fucking mother fucker!! WHAT THE FUCK DOES THE KC/SD GAME GOT TO DO WITH ME. Man you are so f'ing stupid dumb it aint even funny. Make some damn sense when you morons speak. Or get the fuck out. And your a MICHIGAN fan, we dont want you! GO AWAY!!!
I'd like to see what you and onebrokebloke were saying couple weeks ago about the Chiefs / Chargers game....same shit different toliet just watch - granted Chargers a bit more inconsistent than the Packers. This isn't like the Broncos game where Pack are trying to prove something, they've made their case already + they on a short week.
First of u little Maggot! I get pist easy or straight bash people often. But seriusly man you are one stupid fucking mother fucker!! WHAT THE FUCK DOES THE KC/SD GAME GOT TO DO WITH ME. Man you are so f'ing stupid dumb it aint even funny. Make some damn sense when you morons speak. Or get the fuck out. And your a MICHIGAN fan, we dont want you! GO AWAY!!!
I dont know I have'nt tried to handicap a Chargers game all year because they just dont seem as dominant against the spread. So I don't understand what you mean. This reminds me of when teams would come into New England getting 17 points and still not cover. The Packers are basically the Patriots of those days because they do have a defense to go with it and the Rams are the slaughter....who the hell would want those points in this game and route for the Rams?....haha....Rodgers basically needs to catch a fever or this one is gonna be an embarassment
Pay no attention to this fool. He is clearly an idiot and has no clue what he is talking about so he decides to TRY to bash us by making something up that only makes sense in his head.
Hey mich fan your probably an idiot cause you bet Yankees last week.
Oh that doesnt make sense? Oh....???
I dont know I have'nt tried to handicap a Chargers game all year because they just dont seem as dominant against the spread. So I don't understand what you mean. This reminds me of when teams would come into New England getting 17 points and still not cover. The Packers are basically the Patriots of those days because they do have a defense to go with it and the Rams are the slaughter....who the hell would want those points in this game and route for the Rams?....haha....Rodgers basically needs to catch a fever or this one is gonna be an embarassment
Pay no attention to this fool. He is clearly an idiot and has no clue what he is talking about so he decides to TRY to bash us by making something up that only makes sense in his head.
Hey mich fan your probably an idiot cause you bet Yankees last week.
Oh that doesnt make sense? Oh....???
Haha it is interesting. I would not mind knowing where you come up with this system or how it works. Do you do this for every game?
Haha it is interesting. I would not mind knowing where you come up with this system or how it works. Do you do this for every game?
Couldn't agree more...may even play the ML MORONITC
Its the games like these every year that just shock the league / public. POSSIBLE
These guys are all professionals. Coming off a bye, desperate for a win, getting absolutely no respect as 14 approaching 15 point dogs. Only the biggest squares and most average joes will be playing the packers. HIGHLY DOUBT IT
Wouldn't even be surprised if Matt Flynn plays the 2nd H and 2nd/3rd stringers start 2nd H to keep everyone fresh for Minn. ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENS IS A BLOWOUT MEANING GB COVER
Only thing that worries me is the ego contest between GB and the Lions. Could be a very underrated factor that will lead to a GB blowout.. THIS IS USELESS! THESE TEAMS WANNA WIN FOR THEMSELVES NOT BECAUSE OF EGO OF EACHOHTER.
Couldn't agree more...may even play the ML MORONITC
Its the games like these every year that just shock the league / public. POSSIBLE
These guys are all professionals. Coming off a bye, desperate for a win, getting absolutely no respect as 14 approaching 15 point dogs. Only the biggest squares and most average joes will be playing the packers. HIGHLY DOUBT IT
Wouldn't even be surprised if Matt Flynn plays the 2nd H and 2nd/3rd stringers start 2nd H to keep everyone fresh for Minn. ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENS IS A BLOWOUT MEANING GB COVER
Only thing that worries me is the ego contest between GB and the Lions. Could be a very underrated factor that will lead to a GB blowout.. THIS IS USELESS! THESE TEAMS WANNA WIN FOR THEMSELVES NOT BECAUSE OF EGO OF EACHOHTER.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.