May have another x20 play....

STILL WAITING.....aint got no more time for your trolling though...try it on someone else.

You don't understand how posting a record that calculates wins the way he does would be misleading to people who think it's a normal w/l record? Like seriously or you just really good at trolling?

@ThrowDemDarts

 Who cares? Cap your own games and move on. You sound like you look in your avatar. 

Now that we know how he calculates his wins and losses, we know it’s units he is referring to not games. 
At the end of the day we all just want to win so let’s get along w one another and make $. 

Did I miss the play through 55 posts of back and forth drama queens  babbling? Or is it Washington wizards??

@melossinglet

 WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

You try too hard at trolling, must be sad. Not even fun. Melossing or whatever I don't know if he's serious or not, which is more enjoyable.

whats the final pick?

@Slappers

 WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I GOT 10 TRILLION PLAYS ON THE PREDS TONIGHT INCASE YOU MISSED IT

WORLD RECORD EITHER WAY 

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"TO PEOPLE WHO THINK ITS A NORMAL W/L RECORD"...thats the key there,einstein!!!!thats the key right there..unless you are a small child you should do due diligence and not just blindly tail anyone or assume that just cos they say they are the greatest then that means they are...and if you had done that due diligence you would see that record can fluctuate based on varying bet sizes...if you didnt know this then THATS ON YOU.nobody else.theres no crying in gambling,little fella.particularly when you look to tail another person who you dont know.

is it a fair assumption in general that every record is based on a 1 unit flat betting method??eh,yeah a lot of the time thats the conventional approach...but would i assume without the slightest bit of research that its the case and start putting money behind it??na,im not that dumb.

you need to troll elsewhere..your "work" here is done.

I just wanna know if Kush posted the play or is it a no-go after all these discussions 

BOL either way!

If that individual didn't call him out on it, no one would have known that's what he was doing and everyone would just assume he was 89-66. If that's not misleading to you, I don't know what to tell you. Normal, non-trolling people understand what a w/l record is and what it's intended to mean and shouldn't have to do research on whether someone has some weird w/l calculation. The fact you are going this deep in to defending this is quite humorous to be honest. 

@ThrowDemDarts

I see no problem in the kush counts his w-l...stop fixating on it, too much guys..let em do what works for them. Its just like kush is counting how many units he has won

Its better than the guyss who keeps bragging about his W-L after the break, but has actually lost every POM,POY play he has made...

I'm honestly not trying to bash you as a poster and don't care what you did or do with the 10 losses or what your adjusted record would be. I don't think you did it intentionally to deceive. I'm just saying the principle of it is wrong and misleading. Especially since if you look at the previous thread you bumped, 99% of people would open that and think you were 89-66. It's not any deeper than that. GL with your plays.

If someone blindly tails without knowing the profile of the capper he is tailing, then he deserves to lose.

@masterkush

 take them both off and calculate it correctly like any dumdum would