Posted:
#26
BOL BUDDY 
Claim to Fame - beating Bill Rodgers in a race.
May have another x20 play....
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.
Damn u a lot of free time. War & Peavce novel right here.
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.
He posted his record as 89-65 with no clarification that it was units or how he calculates it. I thought he was 89-65 like a normal record is kept. Wasn't until someone questioned him as to why he went from 69-65 to 89-65 over night. Then he explained that he added 20 wins to his record because it was a 20x play. That's just misleading and wrong. I have no clue why this is even a discussion. Lol
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really. He posted his record as 89-65 with no clarification that it was units or how he calculates it. I thought he was 89-65 like a normal record is kept. Wasn't until someone questioned him as to why he went from 69-65 to 89-65 over night. Then he explained that he added 20 wins to his record because it was a 20x play. That's just misleading and wrong. I have no clue why this is even a discussion. Lol
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really. He posted his record as 89-65 with no clarification that it was units or how he calculates it. I thought he was 89-65 like a normal record is kept. Wasn't until someone questioned him as to why he went from 69-65 to 89-65 over night. Then he explained that he added 20 wins to his record because it was a 20x play. That's just misleading and wrong. I have no clue why this is even a discussion. Lol
na.
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by Supersharpone:
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really. Damn u a lot of free time. War & Peavce novel right here.
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao. HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW?? this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes?? he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead..... it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really. Damn u a lot of free time. War & Peavce novel right here.
eh,its the middle of the day.aint much to do.just waitin for games to start...maybe you just type slow??only takes 4-6 minutes to type 5 paragraphs.
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @ThrowDemDarts dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous.
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @ThrowDemDarts dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous.
STILL WAITING for an explanation of what is ridiculous or misleading....to make an accusation of something and then not be able to justify it..THAT is "trolling" isnt it??thats what YOU are doing,baiting just to get a reaction or argument.i clearly stated the case as i can see it and you have yet to refute adequately....best of luck on your trolling endeavours.
Posted:
#36
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
long as its clarified before the puck drops....best of luck...but one thing though,how many units is your bankroll?
hahahahah even my wife doesn't text her side boyfriend this much in a day!
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oh no,sorry it doesnt count..game had already started..this just makes you a deceitful liar...not too surprising.
Posted:
#46
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oh no,sorry it doesnt count..game had already started..this just makes you a deceitful liar...not too surprising.
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @ThrowDemDarts dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous. STILL WAITING for an explanation of what is ridiculous or misleading....to make an accusation of something and then not be able to justify it..THAT is "trolling" isnt it??thats what YOU are doing,baiting just to get a reaction or argument.i clearly stated the case as i can see it and you have yet to refute adequately....best of luck on your trolling endeavours.
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @ThrowDemDarts dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous. STILL WAITING for an explanation of what is ridiculous or misleading....to make an accusation of something and then not be able to justify it..THAT is "trolling" isnt it??thats what YOU are doing,baiting just to get a reaction or argument.i clearly stated the case as i can see it and you have yet to refute adequately....best of luck on your trolling endeavours.
You don't understand how posting a record that counts wins like he does would be misleading? Like seriously? Are you slow or something?
Hot Forum Topics
