May have another x20 play....

Here on covers when you cry you die. You can take line one which leads straight to the crematorium or the second line which merges with the first line.

@masterkush

 It means someone is trying too hard.

GL MK

so, if it wins you are 20-0 on the day?  

GL bro....I'm going big on Memphis

That's not how records work. You don't count a bet as 20 wins because you call it 20x. That's what units are for not W/L records.

who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff.

Good luck kush 

if U don’t have no haters u doing something wrong

Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did. 

Im gonna go out on a limb and say it’s the hawks. BOL kush. 

@melossinglet

 well I mean if you are gonna keep a record it should probably follow some standard guideline

the logic is hilarious though, Ill give him that

so if I bet $1 20 times on the preds tonight and they win then that is 20 wins.....

but if I bet $20 1 time on the preds tonight and they win that is only 1 win.....

hopefully you see the problem there lol 

the pick is the pick, who cares if he bets it once or 20 trillion times......

soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is.

You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao.

And he didn't mention it before, he's only mentioning it now because people questioned why his record went from 69-65 to 89-65 overnight. Then he said what he did. I have no problem with this thread, just saying the way he's doing it is misleading and wrong if he's going to include this 20x bet as 20 wins the next time he lists his w/l record.

i think you miss the point though in that he ISNT varying bet/unit size on the larger plays..it is the equivalent of 20 normal bets..NOT 1/20th of a bet placed 20 times to equal just a normal sized bet.that would be asinine and pointless obviously.....anyhow,people can do whatever the fugg they please.so long as its clear beforehand.the only problem is when folk say one standard unit pre game and then claim they really played 25 units so that the record blows up,gets inflated.

HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW??

this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about.

@masterkush

 Smoke that kush and smash that bet bro like how i smash my wife's sister after a joint. Best of luck bro! 

You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha. 

@ThrowDemDarts

 So what if he means 89 units won and 65 units lost? It’s simply switching out the word record for units. 

why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes??

he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever.

i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead.....

it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.