Posted:
#26
Thanks Narco!
Believe
0
LET'S KEEP IT GOING.. ANOTHER BIG PLAY....
Posted:
#33
I know the following info means nothing as it's related to this evening's total involving the Twolves and Lakers. In any case I checked out the previous game totals involving the same two clubs going back to include the games played between them last season as well as the lone meeting this yr.
It's interesting to note that in the meetings in Minnesota, all the final scores topped the 205 point total mark while the games played in Los Angeles, the games scores both hit below 190.
0
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by pinballwizard:
I know the following info means nothing as it's related to this evening's total involving the Twolves and Lakers. In any case I checked out the previous game totals involving the same two clubs going back to include the games played between them last season as well as the lone meeting this yr.
It's interesting to note that in the meetings in Minnesota, all the final scores topped the 205 point total mark while the games played in Los Angeles, the games scores both hit below 190.
Those who live in the past, stay in the past. Forget that stuff. Focus on today, now, right this second. Don't you think those guys who set the total knew this before they put up an outrageous 205 up there?
Those who focus on the past, stay in the past. Good luck...
0
Posted:
#37
The past is like an exgirlfriend. Why would you want to go back and have sex with the same girl? Why wouldn't you want something new? Something more exciting? Something that smells better? She's in the past for a reason. Let her lay there with the undesirables....
Those who focus on the past, stay in the past.....Remember that when capping totals.
0
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by Narco:
The past is like an exgirlfriend. Why would you want to go back and have sex with the same girl? Why wouldn't you want something new? Something more exciting? Something that smells better? She's in the past for a reason. Let her lay there with the undesirables....
Those who focus on the past, stay in the past.....Remember that when capping totals.
LOL Narco!!! So true it's funny to me!!! I like your attitude!! 
“Nothing has meaning except for the meaning you give it.”
0
Posted:
#42
If you like checking refs that's great for you and a few others maybe. But I can tell you that I rarely look at refs and have been very successful with totals. As a matter of fact most of my wins in the first half of the season before the all-star break were from total plays and I haven't looked at refs more than twice all season. You shouldn't label anyone an amateur just because they don't cap totals like you do with refs. Yesterday your Atlanta/Utah Over play was not that great. You also called other games garbage games because they weren't games you were interested in. The Sac game had much value IMO. They had just took the Heat to OT so that alone should tell you they're playing well. The Over was just as good. I actually capped the Det game which was my POD and recommended a play on the ML and taking the points. That wasn't garbage either.
One mans trash is another mans treasure.
One mans trash is another mans treasure.
“A Fool And His Money Are Soon Parted” -Thomas Tusser 1557
0
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by SuperSlapem:
If you like checking refs that's great for you and a few others maybe. But I can tell you that I rarely look at refs and have been very successful with totals. As a matter of fact most of my wins in the first half of the season before the all-star break were from total plays and I haven't looked at refs more than twice all season. You shouldn't label anyone an amateur just because they don't cap totals like you do with refs. Yesterday your Atlanta/Utah Over play was not that great. You also called other games garbage games because they weren't games you were interested in. The Sac game had much value IMO. They had just took the Heat to OT so that alone should tell you they're playing well. The Over was just as good. I actually capped the Det game which was my POD and recommended a play on the ML and taking the points. That wasn't garbage either.
One mans trash is another mans treasure.
If you like checking refs that's great for you and a few others maybe. But I can tell you that I rarely look at refs and have been very successful with totals. As a matter of fact most of my wins in the first half of the season before the all-star break were from total plays and I haven't looked at refs more than twice all season. You shouldn't label anyone an amateur just because they don't cap totals like you do with refs. Yesterday your Atlanta/Utah Over play was not that great. You also called other games garbage games because they weren't games you were interested in. The Sac game had much value IMO. They had just took the Heat to OT so that alone should tell you they're playing well. The Over was just as good. I actually capped the Det game which was my POD and recommended a play on the ML and taking the points. That wasn't garbage either.
One mans trash is another mans treasure.
Good luck....now move along....
0
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by Narco:
Those who live in the past, stay in the past. Forget that stuff. Focus on today, now, right this second. Don't you think those guys who set the total knew this before they put up an outrageous 205 up there?
Those who focus on the past, stay in the past. Good luck...
"Those who focus in the past stay in the past". Heh, heh, now that's a good one Narco. Heh, heh. Listen if you read my post clearly, you would have known prior to your response that what I posted had no bearing on tonight's game or total for that matter.Very first sentence my man. I only displayed those numbers to show the difference in totals when playing in Minnesota as compared to the meetings in LA. Good luck!!!
0
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by pinballwizard:
"Those who focus in the past stay in the past". Heh, heh, now that's a good one Narco. Heh, heh. Listen if you read my post clearly, you would have known prior to your response that what I posted had no bearing on tonight's game or total for that matter.Very first sentence my man. I only displayed those numbers to show the difference in totals when playing in Minnesota as compared to the meetings in LA. Good luck!!!
Yes sir, and if you read mine carefully, I said "THOSE"...Not "YOU"
0
Hot Forum Topics
