This may be a really good system...but why wait all year to see if it holds water. Just run it thru the last five seasons and see what the results are. If I get some time today I will run it and present the results I come up with. The only problem would be situations like the redsox and d-Rays this weekend. If a person misses the chance to make the play or the play gets canceled I guess he would count it as a push and oplay the next game or wait until the next situation rolls around
I already tabulated last season's win/loss record for this system 60-57 (posted it on this thread a few days ago). If you could collect the 2008 season and before results, though... that would be interesting to see too..
0
Quote Originally Posted by RSampsell:
This may be a really good system...but why wait all year to see if it holds water. Just run it thru the last five seasons and see what the results are. If I get some time today I will run it and present the results I come up with. The only problem would be situations like the redsox and d-Rays this weekend. If a person misses the chance to make the play or the play gets canceled I guess he would count it as a push and oplay the next game or wait until the next situation rolls around
I already tabulated last season's win/loss record for this system 60-57 (posted it on this thread a few days ago). If you could collect the 2008 season and before results, though... that would be interesting to see too..
Yeah. I know this is going to be the problem with this way of playing. It's inevitable that some teams are going to take longer to get to these streaks of W4/L4. Therefore, in your example w/ the Cubs it seems fairly foolish to be risking that amount. This is the main reason I am just putting it to the test this season.
Question: Where do you get the old lines from? I might have to go back and take a look at some of the other examples.
I clicked on a teams home page here at covers. At the top of their home page click on "past results". Then in the dropdown box pick the year you are interested in. It goes all the way back to 1999.
Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way
0
Quote Originally Posted by brrrlacher:
Yeah. I know this is going to be the problem with this way of playing. It's inevitable that some teams are going to take longer to get to these streaks of W4/L4. Therefore, in your example w/ the Cubs it seems fairly foolish to be risking that amount. This is the main reason I am just putting it to the test this season.
Question: Where do you get the old lines from? I might have to go back and take a look at some of the other examples.
I clicked on a teams home page here at covers. At the top of their home page click on "past results". Then in the dropdown box pick the year you are interested in. It goes all the way back to 1999.
I already tabulated last season's win/loss record for this system 60-57 (posted it on this thread a few days ago). If you could collect the 2008 season and before results, though... that would be interesting to see too..
You wouldnt happen to have kept the total amount wagered? anything close to 15-20% ($15000-$20,000) return would be great!
Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way
0
Quote Originally Posted by Davidscott40:
I already tabulated last season's win/loss record for this system 60-57 (posted it on this thread a few days ago). If you could collect the 2008 season and before results, though... that would be interesting to see too..
You wouldnt happen to have kept the total amount wagered? anything close to 15-20% ($15000-$20,000) return would be great!
You wouldnt happen to have kept the total amount wagered? anything close to 15-20% ($15000-$20,000) return would be great!
realize the (+/- units earned) for 2009 and before is the type of past season archive info we REALLY need, but haven't looked that deep into it yet. If covers has this (archived results and closing lines) like someone just mentioned, definitely worth tabulating the actual ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by RSampsell:
You wouldnt happen to have kept the total amount wagered? anything close to 15-20% ($15000-$20,000) return would be great!
realize the (+/- units earned) for 2009 and before is the type of past season archive info we REALLY need, but haven't looked that deep into it yet. If covers has this (archived results and closing lines) like someone just mentioned, definitely worth tabulating the actual ...
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48
0
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48
brrrr, when others are running the system I would suggest checking into what happens the 2nd time around.
May be safer actually to take a team AFTER they win 4 in a row... basically meaning the 2nd time they are going to win the 4th in a row... meaning 2 4 game win streaks or 2 4 game losing streaks.
I would suggest the probability of a team winning their 1st attempt at the 2nd 4 game win streak would be hirer... anyone have thoughts?
0
brrrr, when others are running the system I would suggest checking into what happens the 2nd time around.
May be safer actually to take a team AFTER they win 4 in a row... basically meaning the 2nd time they are going to win the 4th in a row... meaning 2 4 game win streaks or 2 4 game losing streaks.
I would suggest the probability of a team winning their 1st attempt at the 2nd 4 game win streak would be hirer... anyone have thoughts?
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3) Cubs (L3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48 Pitt (W3) -48
0
Quote Originally Posted by brrrlacher:
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3) Cubs (L3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48 Pitt (W3) -48
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3) Cubs (L3) Hou (W3) SFran (L3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48 Pitt (W3) -48 Philadelphia (L3) -38
0
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3) Cubs (L3) Hou (W3) SFran (L3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48 Pitt (W3) -48 Philadelphia (L3) -38
brrrr, when others are running the system I would suggest checking into what happens the 2nd time around.
May be safer actually to take a team AFTER they win 4 in a row... basically meaning the 2nd time they are going to win the 4th in a row... meaning 2 4 game win streaks or 2 4 game losing streaks.
I would suggest the probability of a team winning their 1st attempt at the 2nd 4 game win streak would be hirer... anyone have thoughts?
...is not safer to take after...thats when the risk gets higher....i have done a similar system but i dont quit playing the teams once they quit the streak...i just follow streaks and kind of have a hunch when to play them....i actually do pretty well....you really want to feel it out around the streak of 2(for me) and play the streak....and play them until they lose....example...colorado...last year or yr b4 streaked like 17 games...how much money would you have if you followed and how much would you have if you quit following after 4?????? whatever works for you good luck!!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fizzle254:
brrrr, when others are running the system I would suggest checking into what happens the 2nd time around.
May be safer actually to take a team AFTER they win 4 in a row... basically meaning the 2nd time they are going to win the 4th in a row... meaning 2 4 game win streaks or 2 4 game losing streaks.
I would suggest the probability of a team winning their 1st attempt at the 2nd 4 game win streak would be hirer... anyone have thoughts?
...is not safer to take after...thats when the risk gets higher....i have done a similar system but i dont quit playing the teams once they quit the streak...i just follow streaks and kind of have a hunch when to play them....i actually do pretty well....you really want to feel it out around the streak of 2(for me) and play the streak....and play them until they lose....example...colorado...last year or yr b4 streaked like 17 games...how much money would you have if you followed and how much would you have if you quit following after 4?????? whatever works for you good luck!!!!!!!!!!
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3) Cubs (L3) Hou (W3) SFran (L3) Milw (W3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48 Pitt (W3) -48 Philadelphia (L3) -38 Oakland (L3) -90
0
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3) Anaheim (W3) San Diego (W3) Cubs (L3) Hou (W3) SFran (L3) Milw (W3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59 Toronto (L3) -48 Pitt (W3) -48 Philadelphia (L3) -38 Oakland (L3) -90
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.