It's really betting each team will have their first 4 game winning streak BEFORE their first 3 game winning streak is snapped, and correspondingly have their first 4 game losing streak BEFORE they have their first 3 game losing streak snapped. You keep betting on 3 game streaks until the FIRST 4 game winning streak and FIRST 4 game losing streak for each team. ...60 winning plays, and you're done.
so it is kind of a chase thing it some ways then too
0
Quote Originally Posted by Davidscott40:
It's really betting each team will have their first 4 game winning streak BEFORE their first 3 game winning streak is snapped, and correspondingly have their first 4 game losing streak BEFORE they have their first 3 game losing streak snapped. You keep betting on 3 game streaks until the FIRST 4 game winning streak and FIRST 4 game losing streak for each team. ...60 winning plays, and you're done.
so it is kind of a chase thing it some ways then too
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59
0
Just a reminder to all who are following. Below are the teams and streaks that we have already cashed on. These will NOT be a play the next time they are at their respective W3/L3 because we have already won on them.
San Fran (W3) Minnesota (W3) Oakland (W3) Anaheim (L3) Houston (L3) Seattle (L3) Toronto (W3) White Sox (L3) Detroit (W3) Baltimore (L3) Philadelphia (W3) Cleveland (L3) Mets (L3) Tampa Bay (W3) Seattle (W3) Cincy (L3) Yanks (W3) Texas (L3) Red Sox (L3) Cleveland (W3) Arizona (L3)
===Below are teams we have lost on and will need to adjust the units on===
Reds (W3) -44 Rockies (W3) -105 Texas (W3) -55 Atlanta (W3) -50 Detroit (L3) -46 Nationals (W3) -59
and why you play this team : Kansas city, Angels and Padres ?
thks
Toronto is 3 lost in a row
Kansas is 1 win in a row
Angels is 3 win in a row
Detroit is 1 win in a row
Padres is 3 win a row
thks to explain me
He plays teams that have won 3 in a row and against teams that have lost 3 in a row. Their opponents record does not really matter unless they have also won three in a row.
The numbers are what he is risking to what he can win. 83 if he loses angels, 50 is what he will win if angels win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hart31:
What means 48/50, 83/50 and 43/50 ?
and why you play this team : Kansas city, Angels and Padres ?
thks
Toronto is 3 lost in a row
Kansas is 1 win in a row
Angels is 3 win in a row
Detroit is 1 win in a row
Padres is 3 win a row
thks to explain me
He plays teams that have won 3 in a row and against teams that have lost 3 in a row. Their opponents record does not really matter unless they have also won three in a row.
The numbers are what he is risking to what he can win. 83 if he loses angels, 50 is what he will win if angels win.
This may be a really good system...but why wait all year to see if it holds water. Just run it thru the last five seasons and see what the results are. If I get some time today I will run it and present the results I come up with. The only problem would be situations like the redsox and d-Rays this weekend. If a person misses the chance to make the play or the play gets canceled I guess he would count it as a push and oplay the next game or wait until the next situation rolls around
Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way
0
This may be a really good system...but why wait all year to see if it holds water. Just run it thru the last five seasons and see what the results are. If I get some time today I will run it and present the results I come up with. The only problem would be situations like the redsox and d-Rays this weekend. If a person misses the chance to make the play or the play gets canceled I guess he would count it as a push and oplay the next game or wait until the next situation rolls around
Just a quick figure, I swear this was the first team I checked being a cub fan and all.......last year it took the Cubs 3 times of winning 3 in row before winning their 4th in a row:
First Attempt -
April 15th - Line -201 - $100.50 risk to win $50 = Lost
Down $100.50
Second Attempt -
April 22 - Line -156 - Risk $234.78 to win $50 (plus $100.50 down) - Lost
Down $335.28
Third Attempt -
May 4 - Line -169 - Risking $651.12 to win $50 (+$335.28 back)
- Win
So you would have had to risk $982.40 to win $50
I know not all will take 3 times to win...I would say 60% will win first time they get to 3...but if it goes to 4 or 5 tries there will be a lot of money at risk...plus what if your book wont take a play on that game. Im not knockin...just trying to weigh the options..
Player would still have to use some kind of money managment along the lines somwhere
Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way
0
Just a quick figure, I swear this was the first team I checked being a cub fan and all.......last year it took the Cubs 3 times of winning 3 in row before winning their 4th in a row:
First Attempt -
April 15th - Line -201 - $100.50 risk to win $50 = Lost
Down $100.50
Second Attempt -
April 22 - Line -156 - Risk $234.78 to win $50 (plus $100.50 down) - Lost
Down $335.28
Third Attempt -
May 4 - Line -169 - Risking $651.12 to win $50 (+$335.28 back)
- Win
So you would have had to risk $982.40 to win $50
I know not all will take 3 times to win...I would say 60% will win first time they get to 3...but if it goes to 4 or 5 tries there will be a lot of money at risk...plus what if your book wont take a play on that game. Im not knockin...just trying to weigh the options..
Player would still have to use some kind of money managment along the lines somwhere
Just a quick figure, I swear this was the first team I checked being a cub fan and all.......last year it took the Cubs 3 times of winning 3 in row before winning their 4th in a row:
First Attempt -
April 15th - Line -201 - $100.50 risk to win $50 = Lost
Down $100.50
Second Attempt -
April 22 - Line -156 - Risk $234.78 to win $50 (plus $100.50 down) - Lost
Down $335.28
Third Attempt -
May 4 - Line -169 - Risking $651.12 to win $50 (+$335.28 back)
- Win
So you would have had to risk $982.40 to win $50
I know not all will take 3 times to win...I would say 60% will win first time they get to 3...but if it goes to 4 or 5 tries there will be a lot of money at risk...plus what if your book wont take a play on that game. Im not knockin...just trying to weigh the options..
Player would still have to use some kind of money managment along the lines somwhere
Misadded..sorry..
Actually it was a total risk $1086.10 to win $50
Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way
0
Quote Originally Posted by RSampsell:
Just a quick figure, I swear this was the first team I checked being a cub fan and all.......last year it took the Cubs 3 times of winning 3 in row before winning their 4th in a row:
First Attempt -
April 15th - Line -201 - $100.50 risk to win $50 = Lost
Down $100.50
Second Attempt -
April 22 - Line -156 - Risk $234.78 to win $50 (plus $100.50 down) - Lost
Down $335.28
Third Attempt -
May 4 - Line -169 - Risking $651.12 to win $50 (+$335.28 back)
- Win
So you would have had to risk $982.40 to win $50
I know not all will take 3 times to win...I would say 60% will win first time they get to 3...but if it goes to 4 or 5 tries there will be a lot of money at risk...plus what if your book wont take a play on that game. Im not knockin...just trying to weigh the options..
Player would still have to use some kind of money managment along the lines somwhere
Just a quick figure, I swear this was the first team I checked being a cub fan and all.......last year it took the Cubs 3 times of winning 3 in row before winning their 4th in a row:
First Attempt -
April 15th - Line -201 - $100.50 risk to win $50 = Lost
Down $100.50
Second Attempt -
April 22 - Line -156 - Risk $234.78 to win $50 (plus $100.50 down) - Lost
Down $335.28
Third Attempt -
May 4 - Line -169 - Risking $651.12 to win $50 (+$335.28 back)
- Win
So you would have had to risk $982.40 to win $50
I know not all will take 3 times to win...I would say 60% will win first time they get to 3...but if it goes to 4 or 5 tries there will be a lot of money at risk...plus what if your book wont take a play on that game. Im not knockin...just trying to weigh the options..
Player would still have to use some kind of money managment along the lines somwhere
Yeah. I know this is going to be the problem with this way of playing. It's inevitable that some teams are going to take longer to get to these streaks of W4/L4. Therefore, in your example w/ the Cubs it seems fairly foolish to be risking that amount. This is the main reason I am just putting it to the test this season.
Question: Where do you get the old lines from? I might have to go back and take a look at some of the other examples.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RSampsell:
Just a quick figure, I swear this was the first team I checked being a cub fan and all.......last year it took the Cubs 3 times of winning 3 in row before winning their 4th in a row:
First Attempt -
April 15th - Line -201 - $100.50 risk to win $50 = Lost
Down $100.50
Second Attempt -
April 22 - Line -156 - Risk $234.78 to win $50 (plus $100.50 down) - Lost
Down $335.28
Third Attempt -
May 4 - Line -169 - Risking $651.12 to win $50 (+$335.28 back)
- Win
So you would have had to risk $982.40 to win $50
I know not all will take 3 times to win...I would say 60% will win first time they get to 3...but if it goes to 4 or 5 tries there will be a lot of money at risk...plus what if your book wont take a play on that game. Im not knockin...just trying to weigh the options..
Player would still have to use some kind of money managment along the lines somwhere
Yeah. I know this is going to be the problem with this way of playing. It's inevitable that some teams are going to take longer to get to these streaks of W4/L4. Therefore, in your example w/ the Cubs it seems fairly foolish to be risking that amount. This is the main reason I am just putting it to the test this season.
Question: Where do you get the old lines from? I might have to go back and take a look at some of the other examples.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.