Posted:
#26
0
Don't be fooled into thinking that.......
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by ZeroSumGames:
Don't be fooled into thinking that there is some system or the strategy that will guarantee you winning and profiting betting on sports. There is NONE.... Except MINE!
Don't be fooled into thinking that there is some system or the strategy that will guarantee you winning and profiting betting on sports. There is NONE.... Except MINE!
I have been running and testing the .... I don't even want to call it a system or a strategy - for the whole month of June. It works. No. I'm not a toute and are not going to open a website or a twitter and lure you to come after me. I just need to test it for longer with you being my witnesses. I will give all of the pick FOR FREE. Here! Guaratfuckingteed!
Today was a last day for my test and look at this mother:
| 1 | Sportsbook | 172051638Baseball2017-06-10 13:41:35 | Boston Red Sox -1.5 Boston Red Sox [C. Sale] -vs- Detroit Tigers [J. Verlander] Game Handicap MLB @ 2017-06-10 | 101 A | Risk:100.00 (100.00) | Running |
so I will tell you what, what you are saying is complete garbage, try and pick some real games, like today, with Toronto and Seattle, as well go ahead and pick the team between Minnesota and San Fransico today, until you can pick some games other than chalk games you have nothing. Not here to burst your bubble just to give you a some perspective. I will be following just for giggles to see how the game you pick work out, there is no magic anything, get with at best it is a coin toss, or a magic cube, or pyramid power or any other hocus pocus you can come up with. In the mean time do not bank on this system you could end up losing everything you own.
0
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by GuelphGolfer:
so I will tell you what, what you are saying is complete garbage, try and pick some real games, like today, with Toronto and Seattle, as well go ahead and pick the team between Minnesota and San Fransico today, until you can pick some games other than chalk games you have nothing. Not here to burst your bubble just to give you a some perspective. I will be following just for giggles to see how the game you pick work out, there is no magic anything, get with at best it is a coin toss, or a magic cube, or pyramid power or any other hocus pocus you can come up with. In the mean time do not bank on this system you could end up losing everything you own.
I don't really understand your point. Are you saying that money won on certain games is sweeter than the money won on others? You also talk a lot ike someone with a breat experience in handicapping - yet - I can not ignore your rookie vocabulary. Chalk? That expression, like sharps, wise guys and all the other expressions grouping people into the segments and the betting patters into the systems - all that is imaginary tricks to justify the losses and say the others are better than you. I have nothing of those. My thing is mathematics. Pure and simple. Reverse engineering the results back to 2007 and up and following the most profitable pattern. If you do understand what am I saying so you also understand how ridiculous were your assumptions based on one or two picks. But, I don't really care as long as the picks go thru. Peace
0
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by ZeroSumGames:
I don't really understand your point. Are you saying that money won on certain games is sweeter than the money won on others? You also talk a lot ike someone with a breat experience in handicapping - yet - I can not ignore your rookie vocabulary. Chalk? That expression, like sharps, wise guys and all the other expressions grouping people into the segments and the betting patters into the systems - all that is imaginary tricks to justify the losses and say the others are better than you. I have nothing of those. My thing is mathematics. Pure and simple. Reverse engineering the results back to 2007 and up and following the most profitable pattern. If you do understand what am I saying so you also understand how ridiculous were your assumptions based on one or two picks. But, I don't really care as long as the picks go thru. Peace
0
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by ZeroSumGames:
I don't really understand your point. Are you saying that money won on certain games is sweeter than the money won on others? You also talk a lot ike someone with a breat experience in handicapping - yet - I can not ignore your rookie vocabulary. Chalk? That expression, like sharps, wise guys and all the other expressions grouping people into the segments and the betting patters into the systems - all that is imaginary tricks to justify the losses and say the others are better than you. I have nothing of those. My thing is mathematics. Pure and simple. Reverse engineering the results back to 2007 and up and following the most profitable pattern. If you do understand what am I saying so you also understand how ridiculous were your assumptions based on one or two picks. But, I don't really care as long as the picks go thru. Peace
what I am saying is that your strategy is not a strategy, and you will lose more than you will win, plain and simple, no mathematics, it does not work like that, it is pure assumption and luck, if you make 53% of your picks then what are you winning, until you are able to travel in at least the 60% mark you are not winning anything, bread crumbs is what you are winning, you will lose more than you will win, at a 100 a bet all you need is a bad couple of days and you are toast and will not recover. Horse and any other sports betting is all reliant on human capabilities the best cappers are 50% and not much more at best,lets see what happens today, I wish you luck on your bets, but you have no system, that is all I am saying. Please take no offense I do not mean to be offensive, I am stating only facts. Have fun and do not lose your mortgage or rent money.
0
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by GuelphGolfer:
what I am saying is that your strategy is not a strategy, and you will lose more than you will win, plain and simple, no mathematics, it does not work like that, it is pure assumption and luck, if you make 53% of your picks then what are you winning, until you are able to travel in at least the 60% mark you are not winning anything, bread crumbs is what you are winning, you will lose more than you will win, at a 100 a bet all you need is a bad couple of days and you are toast and will not recover. Horse and any other sports betting is all reliant on human capabilities the best cappers are 50% and not much more at best,lets see what happens today, I wish you luck on your bets, but you have no system, that is all I am saying. Please take no offense I do not mean to be offensive, I am stating only facts. Have fun and do not lose your mortgage or rent money.
I will sum up your essay for those who have no patience to read what you wrote. With your kind permission - I will also allow myself to add some remarks to your statements.
You're stating that the fact is I have no system.
- I don't have a name for what I am on to besides the patternization based on reverse engineering going 10 years back. So, truly - I have no idea why are you stating what you are stating here and in relation with what.
You're talking about the well known calculation of win/lose percentage necessary to maintain the profitability with 5% juice involved.
- What I do has nothing to do with that. The fact is that I can maintain high profitability even with 50% and that is not the case of win/lose percentage at all as I place the query within the data base asking for a wanted percentage with certain criteria of occurrence. You're totally off assuming what you are here too.
The bottom line is that you are eager to give some constructive advise patronizing the fellow men here talking from an imaginary pedestal of self acclaimed leader. Great. All the power to you and to your flock. But, what that has to do with what I do? I do prove profitability and I didn't hurry to post my experiment before I checked it and tested it practically after proving it theoretically and now I am doing the next stage - in front of all to see and be seen. I want to see that what I think and am convinced is great way to invest money in sports - is indeed such and will maintain the profitability and hold the water on public display.
So, while I am grateful for your best luck wishes - the last thing I want to rely on here is the luck. Good luck yourself!
0
Posted:
#39
Quote Originally Posted by ZeroSumGames:
I will sum up your essay for those who have no patience to read what you wrote. With your kind permission - I will also allow myself to add some remarks to your statements.
You're stating that the fact is I have no system.
- I don't have a name for what I am on to besides the patternization based on reverse engineering going 10 years back. So, truly - I have no idea why are you stating what you are stating here and in relation with what.
You're talking about the well known calculation of win/lose percentage necessary to maintain the profitability with 5% juice involved.
- What I do has nothing to do with that. The fact is that I can maintain high profitability even with 50% and that is not the case of win/lose percentage at all as I place the query within the data base asking for a wanted percentage with certain criteria of occurrence. You're totally off assuming what you are here too.
The bottom line is that you are eager to give some constructive advise patronizing the fellow men here talking from an imaginary pedestal of self acclaimed leader. Great. All the power to you and to your flock. But, what that has to do with what I do? I do prove profitability and I didn't hurry to post my experiment before I checked it and tested it practically after proving it theoretically and now I am doing the next stage - in front of all to see and be seen. I want to see that what I think and am convinced is great way to invest money in sports - is indeed such and will maintain the profitability and hold the water on public display.
So, while I am grateful for your best luck wishes - the last thing I want to rely on here is the luck. Good luck yourself!
as it sits right now you are losing today, so for those that will follow beware!!!!!, I will definitely be fading you, I will watch but I will never take your advice on your imaginary system, we will see, again there is no system the sooner you realize that the better you will be, there was also another guy on here a few weeks ago who thought he had a system as well, I have not seen him on here for a while suit yourself but do not be promising any of these people anything simple as that hocus pocus reverse engineering bullcrap. This is the last you will hear from me but I thought I would take a couple jabs at you.
0
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by GuelphGolfer:
you can only be 50% today, so you will end up losing a couple hundred on your bets, nice system
you can only be 50% today, so you will end up losing a couple hundred on your bets, nice system
I think this thread is not worthy of your presence. You already know that it is not good and have made your conclusions known already. So long. My time is too valuable to try to explain something to someone who's only goal is to find something he can hang on his negativity. You, and anyone who is as shortsigted as yourself - are welcome to stop wasting your time here
0
Posted:
#45
and Boston is losing as well, so good luck buddy, and to all do not follow this clown, he has no idea what he is doing, and that is not negativity, that is cold hard facts, your record for today is abysmal and you lost approximately 300 or close to it. yeah a real good system, you should have just kept betting and not said anything because guys like me do not like snake oil salesman approaches. You wont be spouting this system for long, probably not after today a a matter of fact.
0
Posted:
#48
whats annoying is how people come into the forums claiming they are the second coming of jesus in sports betting.
the same thing happens everytime
1) they flame out right away and disappear
2) they start out a little hot winning a few bets before flaming out an and never to be seen again (unless they make a new account)
basically nobody cares how great your system is. just post your plays and people will commend and follow if you are good. no need for all the fluff. its very TOUT-ish.
0
Posted:
#49
It is most amusing to see some impatient people who most probably live their disappointed lives in a disappointing ways looking for the next disappointment.
Yes, I went 2-4 today. And, yes, I'm happy. Why? Seems like simple explaining won't do it here. So, since I really do not need a fan club and I'm not running for the office in the next term as I was not even born in the US - I really couldn't care less about some being annoyed and dissatisfied because I didn't go today 6-0. Well, my intention was never to win all the games or the picks. Not at all. I can tell you as much as that in some extent I am happy some games lost that will turn into great profit in the future. And, I am not going to let you all in right away as it seems some have a very limited brain capabilities unable to incapacitate enough knowledge base to be able analyse it with the given tools. In other words - seems like some of the commenting members were not blessed nor with fast processing nor with RAM enough to facilitate the required processing operation.
For an example - Scherzer losing to Bibens-Dirkx. In my notebook entry it looks as follows:
Scherzer from the Nationals on a system after a great loss tonight to the Rangers Bibens-Dirkx.
Don't understand? Good. You will soon enough.
And, this is my bankroll after tonight
USD 2,969.40
0
Posted:
#50
BTW, tonight I got convinced how hungry most of you really are for someone who is straightforward and smart enough for you to trust. Why am I saying that? Because besides two or three intellectually challenged members - I can see hundreds who are smart enough to patiently scout what I have to offer. And to those - thanks for your silence today. You will be rewarded for your patience. That's a mathematician's promise!
0
Hot Forum Topics
