I just wonder - with your permission of course and without an intent to create an argument - where are those two butt wipes GuelpherGolfer and TERP today?
Well it sure sounds like you are trying to start and argument
Especially because nobody is bashing his picks or talking trash when he loses. We are simply talking about the fluff that he came steaming into the forums with. 9 times out of 10 people come in here with 0 post in their history/brand new account basically begging for attention with a subject line and post claiming to be some gambling god. I'm happy if he thinks he has a system to beat the bookie but the marketing isn't necessary. Post winners and you will get followers. Also it comes off that he Seems like he's more concerned with showing us he's the answer more than he's worried about capping games
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mick960:
I just wonder - with your permission of course and without an intent to create an argument - where are those two butt wipes GuelpherGolfer and TERP today?
Well it sure sounds like you are trying to start and argument
Especially because nobody is bashing his picks or talking trash when he loses. We are simply talking about the fluff that he came steaming into the forums with. 9 times out of 10 people come in here with 0 post in their history/brand new account basically begging for attention with a subject line and post claiming to be some gambling god. I'm happy if he thinks he has a system to beat the bookie but the marketing isn't necessary. Post winners and you will get followers. Also it comes off that he Seems like he's more concerned with showing us he's the answer more than he's worried about capping games
I just wonder - with your permission of course and without an intent to create an argument - where are those two butt wipes GuelpherGolfer and TERP today?
Hey Dicksmash I am still here observing this, nothing magic here two over bets big friggin deal, worry about your own bank roll, there is no
formula, you will see, or if there is, it is not the formula that is winning but just common sense for everyone else. Thanks for the mention though, I will be watching.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mick960:
I just wonder - with your permission of course and without an intent to create an argument - where are those two butt wipes GuelpherGolfer and TERP today?
Hey Dicksmash I am still here observing this, nothing magic here two over bets big friggin deal, worry about your own bank roll, there is no
formula, you will see, or if there is, it is not the formula that is winning but just common sense for everyone else. Thanks for the mention though, I will be watching.
and just to throw a chalk in there I will take Boston as well, picked 3 out of 4 last night, NYY losing to LAA, was the shitkicker, anyway, I picked those in about 20 seconds.
0
I will through a couple of picks out there,
Tampa
Minnesota
Colorado
and just to throw a chalk in there I will take Boston as well, picked 3 out of 4 last night, NYY losing to LAA, was the shitkicker, anyway, I picked those in about 20 seconds.
Leafs guy - read again what he wrote. Cause, none of your replies seem to be related. He clearly states he's not about handicapping and doesn't ask you, me , or anyone else to follow him. He is one of the few as far as I have seen - that posts what he bets and does it seconds after he placed a wager. Your replies are out of place and condescending.
0
Leafs guy - read again what he wrote. Cause, none of your replies seem to be related. He clearly states he's not about handicapping and doesn't ask you, me , or anyone else to follow him. He is one of the few as far as I have seen - that posts what he bets and does it seconds after he placed a wager. Your replies are out of place and condescending.
Great job ZeroSumGames! Great job ignoring the attention whoores and sticking to what you've started. You know that the serious people have your back here.
I'm very curious and excited at the same time identifying some patterns in your picks sequence.
0
Great job ZeroSumGames! Great job ignoring the attention whoores and sticking to what you've started. You know that the serious people have your back here.
I'm very curious and excited at the same time identifying some patterns in your picks sequence.
Keep doing what your doing bro. Dont let these losers distract you. They just want to bring you down to where there at. I truly will never understand the hate, the dude is taking his time to share his picks. If you dont agree with the system, thats fine, no need to try and bash the guy. This forum really brings out the worst in people. Good luck bro
0
Keep doing what your doing bro. Dont let these losers distract you. They just want to bring you down to where there at. I truly will never understand the hate, the dude is taking his time to share his picks. If you dont agree with the system, thats fine, no need to try and bash the guy. This forum really brings out the worst in people. Good luck bro
I mean there are too many pages and responses to scroll through so correct me if I'm wrong, but everyone day you post picks of a favorite with a -1.5 run line, correct?
0
I mean there are too many pages and responses to scroll through so correct me if I'm wrong, but everyone day you post picks of a favorite with a -1.5 run line, correct?
I mean there are too many pages and responses to scroll through so correct me if I'm wrong, but everyone day you post picks of a favorite with a -1.5 run line, correct?
Allow me please to answer you without any intention to hijack this thread or be disrespectful: if you're too lazy to scroll down the whole thread and read at least every post Zerosumgames wrote - you will never make it to anywhere - so, you might as well quit now. This is not for the children with ADD.
Again, sorry to come at you like this, but, Zerosumgames didn't so far cooperate with anyone who just wanted a quick fix. It is not a quick fix station.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bklynryan:
I mean there are too many pages and responses to scroll through so correct me if I'm wrong, but everyone day you post picks of a favorite with a -1.5 run line, correct?
Allow me please to answer you without any intention to hijack this thread or be disrespectful: if you're too lazy to scroll down the whole thread and read at least every post Zerosumgames wrote - you will never make it to anywhere - so, you might as well quit now. This is not for the children with ADD.
Again, sorry to come at you like this, but, Zerosumgames didn't so far cooperate with anyone who just wanted a quick fix. It is not a quick fix station.
Those who want to know the simple example what I'm trying to experiment on publicly: if you betted $100 on the Nationals winning Run Lines from the beginning of the season and tripled your betting amount after each time they wouldn't cover the -1.5 line - beginning with $100 and $10K bankroll - you'd have right now in your hand $48,400 (10K bakroll + 38.4K winnings)while most of your bets would be between $100 and $900. You would have never needed to add more money. Sounds insane? Check for yourself.
0
The last bet is a new R&D subject.
Those who want to know the simple example what I'm trying to experiment on publicly: if you betted $100 on the Nationals winning Run Lines from the beginning of the season and tripled your betting amount after each time they wouldn't cover the -1.5 line - beginning with $100 and $10K bankroll - you'd have right now in your hand $48,400 (10K bakroll + 38.4K winnings)while most of your bets would be between $100 and $900. You would have never needed to add more money. Sounds insane? Check for yourself.
Allow me please to answer you without any intention to hijack this thread or be disrespectful: if you're too lazy to scroll down the whole thread and read at least every post Zerosumgames wrote - you will never make it to anywhere - so, you might as well quit now. This is not for the children with ADD.
Again, sorry to come at you like this, but, Zerosumgames didn't so far cooperate with anyone who just wanted a quick fix. It is not a quick fix station.
no disrespect to you, but i don't have time to scroll past 300 meaningless comments made by idiotic people. Especially when it consists of 5 pages. So excuse me, but i would like some more info. on what exactly this strategy or betting style he is using really is. Nor did i say i wanted a "quick fix", i just want like some thorough info on what exactly he's doing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14allall41:
Allow me please to answer you without any intention to hijack this thread or be disrespectful: if you're too lazy to scroll down the whole thread and read at least every post Zerosumgames wrote - you will never make it to anywhere - so, you might as well quit now. This is not for the children with ADD.
Again, sorry to come at you like this, but, Zerosumgames didn't so far cooperate with anyone who just wanted a quick fix. It is not a quick fix station.
no disrespect to you, but i don't have time to scroll past 300 meaningless comments made by idiotic people. Especially when it consists of 5 pages. So excuse me, but i would like some more info. on what exactly this strategy or betting style he is using really is. Nor did i say i wanted a "quick fix", i just want like some thorough info on what exactly he's doing.
So, watching the Nationals being slaughtered by the Braves is laughable for me as I'm losing $100 and hoping that the Nationals will really really get the worse of this game so they win the next one for me for $300, or the next for $900. Please notice that with the later I can go 1-2 and still profit $500.
This is only one of the seven tested strategies being tested and I wrote about as I think it is the easiest top comprehend because of its similarity to his younger and undeveloped forefather - the Martingale
0
So, watching the Nationals being slaughtered by the Braves is laughable for me as I'm losing $100 and hoping that the Nationals will really really get the worse of this game so they win the next one for me for $300, or the next for $900. Please notice that with the later I can go 1-2 and still profit $500.
This is only one of the seven tested strategies being tested and I wrote about as I think it is the easiest top comprehend because of its similarity to his younger and undeveloped forefather - the Martingale