I see you finally took my advice and decided to chase red Sox. Good move because they've only had once this season a 3 game losing streak much better choice than Yankees and nationals you were blindly chasing
I saw what you were writing in other threads and honestly - you're one piece of sheit of a person. Double faced and double tongued. You also keep repeating that Zero chases anything. Obviously, you have no idea what chasing means. And, why did you temper with his pick and entered the "g" somehow? Are you trying again to discredit someone so you could look good like in other threads?
Finalo question - how old are you still dreaming to have a Lambo one day?
0
Quote Originally Posted by The_Extremist:
I see you finally took my advice and decided to chase red Sox. Good move because they've only had once this season a 3 game losing streak much better choice than Yankees and nationals you were blindly chasing
I saw what you were writing in other threads and honestly - you're one piece of sheit of a person. Double faced and double tongued. You also keep repeating that Zero chases anything. Obviously, you have no idea what chasing means. And, why did you temper with his pick and entered the "g" somehow? Are you trying again to discredit someone so you could look good like in other threads?
Finalo question - how old are you still dreaming to have a Lambo one day?
is that sysco? second only to thong song...thx for that. ill say this one more for the dolts that dont read. you need 1 of 2 things to play this system; a massive roll or the ability to start at around 5$ stake on first "opportunity"
in no way am i arguing the efficacy of an unlimited bankroll chase system, only warning the folks that see success and jump in with a 20$ wager out of their 500$ roll...as with anything DD is crucial to success. BOL BALLERS
If you did read the whole thread indeed - you do understand then what was my summary of the Yankees RL experiment. I said that although the longer the losing streak means more profits when the streak is over - and, all the streaks end one day - in order to make it reachable - there must be found some sort of competition aspect which does not carry long streaks in any direction - high fluctuation as I said. But, I can understand that lots of young kids who are thinking 100 dollars are a lots of money are visiting my thread and once seeing 100K they are full of disbelief and trust. But, that is not my problem. Since I am not asking nothing but the focus and attention to what I am trying to experiment - I don't care if 99% of the visitors wouldn't believe a word I write or will think this is a fake money I'm uploading and winning. That is not up to me what people think. It is also noyt up to me to see that they will all engage in this system/s. Actually better for me if they don't as I can easily do them myself. That is the conclusion I'm drawing slowly but surely. So, after conducting each of my 7 experiments here while we are now in a midst of the second and the third, and will choose the best 3 systems - my job bringing it to the masses will be done and I will be well on my way away and gone from posting. Whoever it will suit and who ever can afford - will try. Who ever has a doubt - it is their doubt and their money and lives.
For me it was and still is important to show in practice how it works.
0
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
do to each other what they on discovery channel
is that sysco? second only to thong song...thx for that. ill say this one more for the dolts that dont read. you need 1 of 2 things to play this system; a massive roll or the ability to start at around 5$ stake on first "opportunity"
in no way am i arguing the efficacy of an unlimited bankroll chase system, only warning the folks that see success and jump in with a 20$ wager out of their 500$ roll...as with anything DD is crucial to success. BOL BALLERS
If you did read the whole thread indeed - you do understand then what was my summary of the Yankees RL experiment. I said that although the longer the losing streak means more profits when the streak is over - and, all the streaks end one day - in order to make it reachable - there must be found some sort of competition aspect which does not carry long streaks in any direction - high fluctuation as I said. But, I can understand that lots of young kids who are thinking 100 dollars are a lots of money are visiting my thread and once seeing 100K they are full of disbelief and trust. But, that is not my problem. Since I am not asking nothing but the focus and attention to what I am trying to experiment - I don't care if 99% of the visitors wouldn't believe a word I write or will think this is a fake money I'm uploading and winning. That is not up to me what people think. It is also noyt up to me to see that they will all engage in this system/s. Actually better for me if they don't as I can easily do them myself. That is the conclusion I'm drawing slowly but surely. So, after conducting each of my 7 experiments here while we are now in a midst of the second and the third, and will choose the best 3 systems - my job bringing it to the masses will be done and I will be well on my way away and gone from posting. Whoever it will suit and who ever can afford - will try. Who ever has a doubt - it is their doubt and their money and lives.
For me it was and still is important to show in practice how it works.
Money: Began with 100 and after 7 losses had to play 75K but played only 50K due to technical issues. Profit = $17352.89 (and should have been 24K more had I not encountered the technical issues uploading the required sum in full).
Mark: 2 out of 10. Recommendation - NOT to do it. You may get drained out before the first win after a long streak of losses.
R&D: yes. Researching two way Run Line Away or Home only option.
Expected results: Not on the priority list yet.
2. System B: Grand Salami martingale X3 alternating directions with each win.
So far so good and should work in a sustained fashion without streaking 7 in any direction. Not even 5.
Conclusion: too early to say. Need a sample model of at least 1/2 season for conclusive evidence it works.
Mark: too early. None. Recommendation: do it with the small size samples. Downside - easy to miss in the days of early starts.
3. System C: Changing martingale subjects everyday after a win and pursuing them till the first win only. Condition - small sample sizes and start after two run line No Wins.
In absolutely early stages of research. Will be back with more in a week reporting on progress.
0
So, this is where we stand today
1. System A: a Run Line one way martingale X3.
Money: Began with 100 and after 7 losses had to play 75K but played only 50K due to technical issues. Profit = $17352.89 (and should have been 24K more had I not encountered the technical issues uploading the required sum in full).
Mark: 2 out of 10. Recommendation - NOT to do it. You may get drained out before the first win after a long streak of losses.
R&D: yes. Researching two way Run Line Away or Home only option.
Expected results: Not on the priority list yet.
2. System B: Grand Salami martingale X3 alternating directions with each win.
So far so good and should work in a sustained fashion without streaking 7 in any direction. Not even 5.
Conclusion: too early to say. Need a sample model of at least 1/2 season for conclusive evidence it works.
Mark: too early. None. Recommendation: do it with the small size samples. Downside - easy to miss in the days of early starts.
3. System C: Changing martingale subjects everyday after a win and pursuing them till the first win only. Condition - small sample sizes and start after two run line No Wins.
In absolutely early stages of research. Will be back with more in a week reporting on progress.
On Monday I will initiate withdrawal process of $83.5K which is the total amount I uploaded for this June round. This thread will close on the last day of June.
Have a nice rest of the weekend!
0
On Monday I will initiate withdrawal process of $83.5K which is the total amount I uploaded for this June round. This thread will close on the last day of June.
Are you guys sure you in the right age to be posting here? Are you out of your minds?
I'm going to ask the mods to remove you both from thios thread. I don't care who's right and who's wrong. I don't care who supports me and who is against me. This is ridiculous. So much insults at each other and at other disadvantaged groups of people. Shame on you. Really
0
The_Extremist and 14allall41,
Are you guys sure you in the right age to be posting here? Are you out of your minds?
I'm going to ask the mods to remove you both from thios thread. I don't care who's right and who's wrong. I don't care who supports me and who is against me. This is ridiculous. So much insults at each other and at other disadvantaged groups of people. Shame on you. Really
Ohohoho, someone's butt is going to be kicked soon or someone will never will be seen on covers again.
Let's start betting people. Will the Extremist show up after being called out by the guy he though is some poor Egyptian (no offense to the Egyptians of course) and turned out to be some Aitalian from Queens NY. I just can't wait to see what happens... Come on, place your bets please!
0
Ohohoho, someone's butt is going to be kicked soon or someone will never will be seen on covers again.
Let's start betting people. Will the Extremist show up after being called out by the guy he though is some poor Egyptian (no offense to the Egyptians of course) and turned out to be some Aitalian from Queens NY. I just can't wait to see what happens... Come on, place your bets please!
@TERP and Golfguelpher - idiots. Don't you get it? You're coming in here and blubbering your small dik BS and complementing each other like half diks that you are. Why don't you get together sometimes and do to each other what they on discovery channel
you are one waste of skin, mouthing off like that on a forum really does show how pathetic you are. You will get your just deserts my friend, I know you will, and when you do, remember just before the lights go out that you really did deserve it, and no doubt much more.
0
Quote Originally Posted by famfatale88:
@Zero
@TERP and Golfguelpher - idiots. Don't you get it? You're coming in here and blubbering your small dik BS and complementing each other like half diks that you are. Why don't you get together sometimes and do to each other what they on discovery channel
you are one waste of skin, mouthing off like that on a forum really does show how pathetic you are. You will get your just deserts my friend, I know you will, and when you do, remember just before the lights go out that you really did deserve it, and no doubt much more.
you are one waste of skin, mouthing off like that on a forum really does show how pathetic you are. You will get your just deserts my friend, I know you will, and when you do, remember just before the lights go out that you really did deserve it, and no doubt much more.
I'm not your friend
0
Quote Originally Posted by GuelphGolfer:
you are one waste of skin, mouthing off like that on a forum really does show how pathetic you are. You will get your just deserts my friend, I know you will, and when you do, remember just before the lights go out that you really did deserve it, and no doubt much more.
Money: Began with 100 and after 7 losses had to play 75K but played only 50K due to technical issues. Profit = $17352.89 (and should have been 24K more had I not encountered the technical issues uploading the required sum in full).
Mark: 2 out of 10. Recommendation - NOT to do it. You may get drained out before the first win after a long streak of losses.
R&D: yes. Researching two way Run Line Away or Home only option.
Expected results: Not on the priority list yet.
2. System B: Grand Salami martingale X3 alternating directions with each win.
So far so good and should work in a sustained fashion without streaking 7 in any direction. Not even 5.
Conclusion: too early to say. Need a sample model of at least 1/2 season for conclusive evidence it works.
Mark: too early. None. Recommendation: do it with the small size samples. Downside - easy to miss in the days of early starts.
3. System C: Changing martingale subjects everyday after a win and pursuing them till the first win only. Condition - small sample sizes and start after two run line No Wins.
In absolutely early stages of research. Will be back with more in a week reporting on progress.
Kudos on your absolute integrity. But, why am I not surprised?
0
Quote Originally Posted by ZeroSumGames:
So, this is where we stand today
1. System A: a Run Line one way martingale X3.
Money: Began with 100 and after 7 losses had to play 75K but played only 50K due to technical issues. Profit = $17352.89 (and should have been 24K more had I not encountered the technical issues uploading the required sum in full).
Mark: 2 out of 10. Recommendation - NOT to do it. You may get drained out before the first win after a long streak of losses.
R&D: yes. Researching two way Run Line Away or Home only option.
Expected results: Not on the priority list yet.
2. System B: Grand Salami martingale X3 alternating directions with each win.
So far so good and should work in a sustained fashion without streaking 7 in any direction. Not even 5.
Conclusion: too early to say. Need a sample model of at least 1/2 season for conclusive evidence it works.
Mark: too early. None. Recommendation: do it with the small size samples. Downside - easy to miss in the days of early starts.
3. System C: Changing martingale subjects everyday after a win and pursuing them till the first win only. Condition - small sample sizes and start after two run line No Wins.
In absolutely early stages of research. Will be back with more in a week reporting on progress.
Kudos on your absolute integrity. But, why am I not surprised?
Hot Forum Topics
