Don't be fooled into thinking that.......

So, I have to digest all what happened and will be back if I will have something more to say. 

If I will feel that the other systems are ready to run in full volume and there is an interest to learn them here - I will be back too. 

There is still lot of work devising the methods and perfecting the process from step one, the flow and the last step which will be to see how fast the money could be withdrawn and how will it add back to my CC account as I am processing all of this in a different way than I did with the NBA where the process was handled thru skrill and bank transfers to few different books. The withdrawals were easy while two out of three books also didn't accept the "next" deposits from me.

Ok. Thanks for your time and attention. Wish you all the best!

And, the Grand Salami is pending

So congrats he "allegedly" has a bankroll that he can just keep chasing until the Yankees win. Good for you Zero but your system still sucks lol

Yankees could have lost 3 more games and you would still be posting that you are betting 90k on them to win....but once they do win you are suddenly a genius? Yeah I don't think so. Most bookies would cut the action off at once you had already blown the first 30k lol

even a blind squirrel gets a nut sometimes, a broken clock is right once a day

The jealousy is eating you eh?

Let me guess, it must be a small prik syndrome eh? You just can't stand anything and anyone being successful in anyway or anything because it reminds you how small your prik is eh? Each time I come across so called "men" like you - I understand better why I like women. Only men worthy of liking are men like Zero. He has done something you wouldn't even have the balls to think about, let alone the brains. 

Go crawl back to your miserable life you troll (sorry trolls for calling this nothingness a troll, I simply couldn't find a better word)

You must be talking about your long life experience. So, which of the two describes you better? A blind squirrel, or the broken clock? I'd guess the second. Because, even a blind squirrel must have more brains and a better vision than you. You didn't see all this coming, didn't you? You didn't understand what Zero tried to explain few times that eventually the subject of his experiment will win and later the better. You don't understand the concept, can't imagine someone having more than few dollars to live on, let alone betting. You're just a small and mistreated human being who wishes everyone bad faith as the one you chose for yourself. Yes. You're the one who chose your miserable life. Why? Because, you are the blind squirrel!

Like I said he was going to win eventually lol....the only way he would be the laughing stock of covers is if the Yankees didn't win a single game the rest of the season. He's going to keep posting fake deposits until he wins. He hasn't figured anything out. You can do the same thing with blackjack. Just keep betting to win what you lost Plus whatever you want to profit until you actually beat the dealer. You seriously must have potatoes for brains if you are getting hard off of this. A broken clock is right once a day is very fitting for zero. He was going to win eventually. Still hilarious it "allegedly" took him 30 something ish thousand dollars later before he eventually hit. And the Yankees losing streak is a perfect example why this isn't realistic nor sustainable. 

Meanwhile you're getting off getting personal on here. That's fine because I don't know you and I don't need to stoop the big tough guy behind a keyboard. I'll keep sticking to the facts that I don't consider his "system" worth anything more than the time I'm wasting arguing back in forth with you. You consider losing 9 bets in a row and having to not only deposit but quadruple your bets just to win what you lost back on that 10th game more power to you. You have your way and I have mine. I'd rather hit at a constant 69-70% clip which is hardly sustainable for almost anyone. His method I would argue is not only not sustainable it isn't realistic for just about everyone on here. I could care less how much real money he spent betting. He clearly cares more about it than anyone else to keep showing it off. Once again and finally I'll drill it into your head I don't care to root for anyone to fail and I have nothing against anyone's success. If it works for Zero then great but if I recall he came in here posting like he has the answers to beating the book when he clearly doesn't. I don't consider losing 50 thousand dollars successful ever. If that works for you then go right ahead. The issue at hand is then TOUTNESS attitudes and that's always going to draw criticism especially when it fails like it did here for a very long stretch at that. Of course the Yankees finally one a game and he "allegedly" won it all back but not even Zero is commenting back because he knows that this isn't what he evinsioned when he first started this thread. Chasing is never where anyone wants to be. If that's how you gamble then more power to you but no reason to talk like you are some betting gawd and anyone that isn't supporting it is bitter. I cannot imagine more than half the people here considering losing that much money REAL or FAKE is successful. 

I will soon bring up the whole history of picks on that set here retrieved from my covers posts. 

 You both have to understand that I don't really care what anyone here thinks or assumes. I'm using the keyboard of my lap top to send some output and receive inputs in form of letters combining into the words and the sentences. I don't get emotional or mad at what people write and say. It is like to get mad at the piece of paper you taking the notes on. 

So, while I appreciate your intention to have my back mick960 and the persistence of TERP to call what I do a chase system makes me laugh - it is the true probability of what I am experimenting with is what really matters to me. Money? Look, I don't know what you call lot of money. For me 100K is a considerable amount of money. Not a lot. Really not. What Christiano Ronaldo, the Real Madrid player earns - that is lot of money. So, please stop arguing about my pocket. I didn't ask anyone for a penny. I know you offered mik960 - here on covers - and I appreciate the act while I don't think anyone takes seriously the possibility I would ask any money from any of you to conduct my own experiment. 

post#207  under 107.5 -106  $212 to win $200     loss

post #237 under 155    -108  $648 to win $600     win

Change of direction

post#340  over 151.5   -102  $612 to win $600     loss

post#374  over 121.5  -113   $3240 to win $2070  win (the games didn't end but we already have way over 121.5 runs)

212 and 612 were lost = -824  

&

600 and 2070 are won = +2670

Summing up  2670-824=1846

So, we have profited in a steady way using the high fluctuation nature of the Grand Salami day in day out

Well said, I like the tough guy behind the keyboard, there are lots of those. 

@TERP and Golfguelpher - idiots. Don't you get it? You're coming in here and blubbering your small dik BS and complementing each other like half diks that you are. Why don't you get together sometimes and do to each other what they on discovery channel

I see you finally took my advice and decided to chase red Sox. Good move because they've only had once this season a 3 game losing streak much better choice than Yankees and nationals you were blindly chasing