One more out.......Then we need a jack......
Couple Thoughts
Well, every fucking fear I had in this game manifested into reality.
I sure as hell wasn’t laying the big price on the first five money line, so I laid the half run, reduced the juice, and now I’m sitting on the short end of the fucking stick.
That’s baseball.
Well, every fucking fear I had in this game manifested into reality.
I sure as hell wasn’t laying the big price on the first five money line, so I laid the half run, reduced the juice, and now I’m sitting on the short end of the fucking stick.
That’s baseball.
Well, every fucking fear I had in this game manifested into reality. I sure as hell wasn’t laying the big price on the first five money line, so I laid the half run, reduced the juice, and now I’m sitting on the short end of the fucking stick. That’s baseball.
Still one helluva week Truck. Let's get 'er done in the week coming up.
![]()
Well, every fucking fear I had in this game manifested into reality. I sure as hell wasn’t laying the big price on the first five money line, so I laid the half run, reduced the juice, and now I’m sitting on the short end of the fucking stick. That’s baseball.
Still one helluva week Truck. Let's get 'er done in the week coming up.
![]()
One thing we can take away from this loss is that Cleveland’s lineup card initially gave LV several moments of hesitation and next time, we should probably use that as an indication to skip the game.
One thing we can take away from this loss is that Cleveland’s lineup card initially gave LV several moments of hesitation and next time, we should probably use that as an indication to skip the game.
Sorry LV. Ties happen about 18% on the FF, do you ever consider the ML.
From what I've noticed he likes staying away from high juice. The ML was like -180
Sorry LV. Ties happen about 18% on the FF, do you ever consider the ML.
From what I've noticed he likes staying away from high juice. The ML was like -180
I understand first five ties happen, and yeah, I look at every wager through a moneyline lens.
But the higher that price gets, the higher the implied win probability I’m paying for. At some point, laying -150 or -160 just to protect against a tie starts creating a completely different longterm math problem.
Sure, every once in a while I’m going to eat a loss like tonight because I laid the half run instead of the bigger moneyline price. That’s part of it.
But over the long run, constantly paying that extra juice adds up fast. I’d rather take the better number when I believe the team should be leading after five and accept that every now and then one of these motherfuckers is going to bite me.
I understand first five ties happen, and yeah, I look at every wager through a moneyline lens.
But the higher that price gets, the higher the implied win probability I’m paying for. At some point, laying -150 or -160 just to protect against a tie starts creating a completely different longterm math problem.
Sure, every once in a while I’m going to eat a loss like tonight because I laid the half run instead of the bigger moneyline price. That’s part of it.
But over the long run, constantly paying that extra juice adds up fast. I’d rather take the better number when I believe the team should be leading after five and accept that every now and then one of these motherfuckers is going to bite me.
I understand first five ties happen, and yeah, I look at every wager through a moneyline lens. But the higher that price gets, the higher the implied win probability I’m paying for. At some point, laying -150 or -160 just to protect against a tie starts creating a completely different longterm math problem. Sure, every once in a while I’m going to eat a loss like tonight because I laid the half run instead of the bigger moneyline price. That’s part of it. But over the long run, constantly paying that extra juice adds up fast. I’d rather take the better number when I believe the team should be leading after five and accept that every now and then one of these motherfuckers is going to bite me.
constantly laying big juice like that sends bettors to the bank for loans
to pay the man.![]()
I understand first five ties happen, and yeah, I look at every wager through a moneyline lens. But the higher that price gets, the higher the implied win probability I’m paying for. At some point, laying -150 or -160 just to protect against a tie starts creating a completely different longterm math problem. Sure, every once in a while I’m going to eat a loss like tonight because I laid the half run instead of the bigger moneyline price. That’s part of it. But over the long run, constantly paying that extra juice adds up fast. I’d rather take the better number when I believe the team should be leading after five and accept that every now and then one of these motherfuckers is going to bite me.
constantly laying big juice like that sends bettors to the bank for loans
to pay the man.![]()
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
444,365
-
Thursday 09/03/2026
755
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,076
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
249,861
-
PART DEUX
233
-
Public Indicator Calculations 2025
65,869
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,242
-
This play will save my reputation on here
2,582
-
Thursday
2,523
-
Thursday's grind
1,317
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
