All opinions and analyzing about the outcome aside.....
was that not a BADASS FIGHT THOUGH OR WHAT? ![]()
[/Quote
I had it the exact same way.Rampage won rounds 1,3 and 4. Forrest won round 2 (10-8) and round 5. Should've been a draw
[/Quote
I had it the exact same way.Rampage won rounds 1,3 and 4. Forrest won round 2 (10-8) and round 5. Should've been a draw
I didn't have a dime on rampage, but I'll still say anyone who thinks that forrest won a UNANIMOUS decision is out of their fucking mind!
you say that rampage didn't do nothing to win this fight? To beat the champ, you have to show a lot more than what Forrest did as well. In order to win UNANIMOUSLY, that means that he won 3 of 5 rounds, regardless of the 10-8 2nd. There is no way that griffin did enough to win 3 rounds.
Plus GENE, you say that rampage didn't even get in his slam. He tried to slam forrest when forrest had a hold of him from the bottom, rampage went to slam him and forrest had to let go of him to protect himself, so what are you talking about?
Anyways, I liked both fighters, so it wasn't that big a deal that rampage lost, I just don't think forrest did that much to earn a UNANIMOUS decision.
I didn't have a dime on rampage, but I'll still say anyone who thinks that forrest won a UNANIMOUS decision is out of their fucking mind!
you say that rampage didn't do nothing to win this fight? To beat the champ, you have to show a lot more than what Forrest did as well. In order to win UNANIMOUSLY, that means that he won 3 of 5 rounds, regardless of the 10-8 2nd. There is no way that griffin did enough to win 3 rounds.
Plus GENE, you say that rampage didn't even get in his slam. He tried to slam forrest when forrest had a hold of him from the bottom, rampage went to slam him and forrest had to let go of him to protect himself, so what are you talking about?
Anyways, I liked both fighters, so it wasn't that big a deal that rampage lost, I just don't think forrest did that much to earn a UNANIMOUS decision.
if you give the last round to forrest then it woulf have been a tie, after the fourth round, when rampage was still winning the anoucher said that forrest was winning the fight, the other anouncer sounded shocked and it sounded like the guy was trying to sell it that forrest was winning
tim slvia was kickins ass, then got choked out, then sighns a deal to fight fedor for 800,0000!!!! hmmm?
if you give the last round to forrest then it woulf have been a tie, after the fourth round, when rampage was still winning the anoucher said that forrest was winning the fight, the other anouncer sounded shocked and it sounded like the guy was trying to sell it that forrest was winning
tim slvia was kickins ass, then got choked out, then sighns a deal to fight fedor for 800,0000!!!! hmmm?

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.