I didnt post a name because its not his fault. But wow how doe3s this happen?
You should be cheering players on when they get an absurd line, it's awesome. You usually have to be very early like 3 in the morning and notice a ridiculous mistake. Scan those lines and see if they screwed up somewhere and grab it before it is caught. I agree with Alexmaldonado, hate the game not the player. I remember many years ago in British Columbia, BCLC Sports Action messed up and put the Over/Unders for the basketball games up using only first half totals for the full game totals. It was free money playing them all over if you managed to get in on it before the games were removed and yes, they did have to pay out.
You should be cheering players on when they get an absurd line, it's awesome. You usually have to be very early like 3 in the morning and notice a ridiculous mistake. Scan those lines and see if they screwed up somewhere and grab it before it is caught. I agree with Alexmaldonado, hate the game not the player. I remember many years ago in British Columbia, BCLC Sports Action messed up and put the Over/Unders for the basketball games up using only first half totals for the full game totals. It was free money playing them all over if you managed to get in on it before the games were removed and yes, they did have to pay out.
@Messy
I would have to agree. I noticed the Detroit/Clev O/U went from 7 to 11.5 when the game got postponed. I went ahead and too Over 7, but I suppose we should all grab them to keep the game fair. IDK. I hope it just stops happening.
@Messy
I would have to agree. I noticed the Detroit/Clev O/U went from 7 to 11.5 when the game got postponed. I went ahead and too Over 7, but I suppose we should all grab them to keep the game fair. IDK. I hope it just stops happening.
i see the most consistent user when it comes to stalking bad lines is as it again..they have minnesota lynx +7.5 for streak survivor...he didn't learn the last time when he had toronto argonauts at like +14.5 and ended up being voided
i see the most consistent user when it comes to stalking bad lines is as it again..they have minnesota lynx +7.5 for streak survivor...he didn't learn the last time when he had toronto argonauts at like +14.5 and ended up being voided
@Jive_Turkey
I’ve had a few. I usually try to make my picks late. I’ve noticed a few lines in a week span that were up to 30 points off in the totals. But over the last X amount of years I haven’t seen that. But I did complain a few years back about mollydog who always seemed to have the lines tipped around 4-5 points in his favor.
this year I seen about 4 crazy lines that moved way off. I jumped on a few as did many others. I actually lost one or 2 of them the others won easily.
@Jive_Turkey
I’ve had a few. I usually try to make my picks late. I’ve noticed a few lines in a week span that were up to 30 points off in the totals. But over the last X amount of years I haven’t seen that. But I did complain a few years back about mollydog who always seemed to have the lines tipped around 4-5 points in his favor.
this year I seen about 4 crazy lines that moved way off. I jumped on a few as did many others. I actually lost one or 2 of them the others won easily.
they really need to clean this crap up with the non-existent lines...skunty4 was sliding big time...nearly down 20k to 1st place and looking and no band-aid in sight for him..and all of a sudden he is like 6k back of 1st after being gifted ridiculously high or low totals and takes under and over respectively...he basically quit taking moneylines and waits for the bad lines to appear so he can jump on them and save his season
they really need to clean this crap up with the non-existent lines...skunty4 was sliding big time...nearly down 20k to 1st place and looking and no band-aid in sight for him..and all of a sudden he is like 6k back of 1st after being gifted ridiculously high or low totals and takes under and over respectively...he basically quit taking moneylines and waits for the bad lines to appear so he can jump on them and save his season
@revnecro1273
Yeah, I want to catch them, but since they were the only one above me taking the glitch lines I did not want to take them. I have won enough contests and I don't think the MLB leader has ever won one. I would feel terrible if I caught them with glitch lines.
@revnecro1273
Yeah, I want to catch them, but since they were the only one above me taking the glitch lines I did not want to take them. I have won enough contests and I don't think the MLB leader has ever won one. I would feel terrible if I caught them with glitch lines.
@revnecro1273
I just looked at yesterday. It seems that if an MLB O/U 9.5 line glitched to 12.5 and Under 9.5 was a win (meaning the glitch line yielded no advantage), they did not void it.
@revnecro1273
I just looked at yesterday. It seems that if an MLB O/U 9.5 line glitched to 12.5 and Under 9.5 was a win (meaning the glitch line yielded no advantage), they did not void it.
I just read this thread. It comes down to the incompetent people that now run this site. And you are incompetent. Have some work ethic and proof read when positing lines.
There have been plenty of posts that talk about doing a better job. So covers, either do a better job or let competent people do it for you. After all said and done after World Cup and all you Europeans praising the USA, maybe we are better then you Europeans that run this site now. This is a challenge to be better, can you?
I just read this thread. It comes down to the incompetent people that now run this site. And you are incompetent. Have some work ethic and proof read when positing lines.
There have been plenty of posts that talk about doing a better job. So covers, either do a better job or let competent people do it for you. After all said and done after World Cup and all you Europeans praising the USA, maybe we are better then you Europeans that run this site now. This is a challenge to be better, can you?
It is absurd to think Mollydog only wins because of bad lines. They still have to play the games. Yes, he takes advantage of some soft lines, but good for him, getting in early and jumping on them. He is one of the very best, consistent cappers on this site and has been for years and gets unfairly bashed by jealous amateurs.
It is absurd to think Mollydog only wins because of bad lines. They still have to play the games. Yes, he takes advantage of some soft lines, but good for him, getting in early and jumping on them. He is one of the very best, consistent cappers on this site and has been for years and gets unfairly bashed by jealous amateurs.
@Messy
it isn't really getting in early...these lines he gets weren't there overnight and the original lines posted...but ends up with tbe bs lines at some point..i look before i go to bed and then when i wake up and in between that dude finds the bs lines that aren't real world lines...and you are right..only reason he is up toward the top of the leaderboard..no bs lines and he is a losing player..that dude was almost negative before they started having crap lines for the wnba contest...they really need to do an audit and void them..it is one thing if he catches before line movement, but these lines he gets are not real...i mean..wings +13.5? wtf was that ever an availale number? was not a misprint on wednesday night...was never a real number at books..but for whatever reason it existed for a period of time that the dude was able to bounce and take a fake number
@Messy
it isn't really getting in early...these lines he gets weren't there overnight and the original lines posted...but ends up with tbe bs lines at some point..i look before i go to bed and then when i wake up and in between that dude finds the bs lines that aren't real world lines...and you are right..only reason he is up toward the top of the leaderboard..no bs lines and he is a losing player..that dude was almost negative before they started having crap lines for the wnba contest...they really need to do an audit and void them..it is one thing if he catches before line movement, but these lines he gets are not real...i mean..wings +13.5? wtf was that ever an availale number? was not a misprint on wednesday night...was never a real number at books..but for whatever reason it existed for a period of time that the dude was able to bounce and take a fake number
Gang,
I’ve said for years that when you’re playing in an industry designed for you to lose, you need to take advantage of any and every angle possible. This industry is built around the house having an edge, and they add the juice to further pad that advantage.
Just on this specific site alone, out of 6,734 players, only 1,250 show a positive unit total—that’s a mere 18.6%. This is why, IMO, a new casino gets built in Vegas every year. The system is built for you to lose.
I’m not a professional. I’m an average Joe—a happily married dad of two, with a full-time grind—who just celebrated his 56th birthday last night in Columbus, Ohio. I’ve had tremendous success on this site by adopting a system and trusting my hunches on most games.
A few of you met me in person last April at the Venetian. I was there for a conference, and when I had some free time, we met up and had some solid success in both the NBA and NHL. To those of you I met, I genuinely appreciated you taking a few minutes away from your crazy lives so we could spend some time together and win together. I’ll be back next March and hopefully we can do it all again.
That said, gambling is surely not my thing.
This thread is kind of ridiculous. If a casino—or, in this case, this site—can’t get its operations together enough to put out lines effectively, that’s not the fault of the player. That’s an issue with the casino or site failing to keep order on its end.
The very person who started this specific thread has very intelligently been siding with advantageous lines and is currently in the Top 20 with a 67% winning percentage. To that, I say, “Well played.”
Heck, I could have taken the under 174 in the Mystic/Aces game tonight. IMO, the line should be around 171. But I’ll wait and hope it gets reset. I’m leaning the other way and don’t want to select a negative number. It’s simply smart playing.
For the record, I have a system and a gut hunch that I use. It doesn’t always work, but it’s been solid enough that I hope I’ve helped many of you win some $$$.
Messy, thanks for the backing and for following along. Revnecro, I’m taking the personal jabs as nothing more than a compliment. Life is short, and it’s all good. Let’s go!!!
Best of luck, everyone. Hopefully, their negligence helps someone find a path to winning the Survivor Streak. That contest is due for a winner.
Mollydog
Gang,
I’ve said for years that when you’re playing in an industry designed for you to lose, you need to take advantage of any and every angle possible. This industry is built around the house having an edge, and they add the juice to further pad that advantage.
Just on this specific site alone, out of 6,734 players, only 1,250 show a positive unit total—that’s a mere 18.6%. This is why, IMO, a new casino gets built in Vegas every year. The system is built for you to lose.
I’m not a professional. I’m an average Joe—a happily married dad of two, with a full-time grind—who just celebrated his 56th birthday last night in Columbus, Ohio. I’ve had tremendous success on this site by adopting a system and trusting my hunches on most games.
A few of you met me in person last April at the Venetian. I was there for a conference, and when I had some free time, we met up and had some solid success in both the NBA and NHL. To those of you I met, I genuinely appreciated you taking a few minutes away from your crazy lives so we could spend some time together and win together. I’ll be back next March and hopefully we can do it all again.
That said, gambling is surely not my thing.
This thread is kind of ridiculous. If a casino—or, in this case, this site—can’t get its operations together enough to put out lines effectively, that’s not the fault of the player. That’s an issue with the casino or site failing to keep order on its end.
The very person who started this specific thread has very intelligently been siding with advantageous lines and is currently in the Top 20 with a 67% winning percentage. To that, I say, “Well played.”
Heck, I could have taken the under 174 in the Mystic/Aces game tonight. IMO, the line should be around 171. But I’ll wait and hope it gets reset. I’m leaning the other way and don’t want to select a negative number. It’s simply smart playing.
For the record, I have a system and a gut hunch that I use. It doesn’t always work, but it’s been solid enough that I hope I’ve helped many of you win some $$$.
Messy, thanks for the backing and for following along. Revnecro, I’m taking the personal jabs as nothing more than a compliment. Life is short, and it’s all good. Let’s go!!!
Best of luck, everyone. Hopefully, their negligence helps someone find a path to winning the Survivor Streak. That contest is due for a winner.
Mollydog
So, we're meant to trust that this site has regular glitches, which are then acted upon by a select few? Is prize money being distributed primarily to the select few who seem to regularly notice and make picks as a result of these supposed glitches? It certainly smells funky to me. I have trouble trusting most of the crap I hear, and if this is a longstanding issue which has not been remedied... then why would anyone trust that there is legitimacy in the humble explanations put forth by anyone who has consistently been at the top of just about every sport?
So, we're meant to trust that this site has regular glitches, which are then acted upon by a select few? Is prize money being distributed primarily to the select few who seem to regularly notice and make picks as a result of these supposed glitches? It certainly smells funky to me. I have trouble trusting most of the crap I hear, and if this is a longstanding issue which has not been remedied... then why would anyone trust that there is legitimacy in the humble explanations put forth by anyone who has consistently been at the top of just about every sport?
anyone else notice that Mollydog failed to mention a very specific and particular detail in the "small print" that casinos and gambling sites add in their TOS, it called a bet made in BAD FAItH, so any casino or gambling site, sports or what ever the novelty bet, when taking advantage of a bad line, they can void you win, we have seen the odd survivor play here voided, and if Mollydog wants to he can find numerous stories of people being denied winnings from major sports books of casino based outlets due to a violation according to them, the customer was taking advantage, and then Molly here, wants a great majority to believe she isnt a shill, his response lacked details for such a seasoned gambler.
anyone else notice that Mollydog failed to mention a very specific and particular detail in the "small print" that casinos and gambling sites add in their TOS, it called a bet made in BAD FAItH, so any casino or gambling site, sports or what ever the novelty bet, when taking advantage of a bad line, they can void you win, we have seen the odd survivor play here voided, and if Mollydog wants to he can find numerous stories of people being denied winnings from major sports books of casino based outlets due to a violation according to them, the customer was taking advantage, and then Molly here, wants a great majority to believe she isnt a shill, his response lacked details for such a seasoned gambler.
@TonyIommi
I don't have a clear decisive answer for you, but for some reason I don't know what was going on I was in first place and the WNBA KOC I was doing the same math as I was, now I think I'm 81st.
@TonyIommi
I don't have a clear decisive answer for you, but for some reason I don't know what was going on I was in first place and the WNBA KOC I was doing the same math as I was, now I think I'm 81st.
In the WNBA at any given time it seems like half of them are glitch lines. Sometimes it's more like 3/4 of them are glitch lines. You almost have to pick Blitz lines if you want to be part of the contest. I have waited until 1 minute before the game hoping that the glitch line would go away and finally taking the glitch line because I wanted to have a pick on that game. I think I got one today when I took Minnesota plus 133 in MLB. I wish I could take it back but maybe they will void it. I just hope they fix it soon.
In the WNBA at any given time it seems like half of them are glitch lines. Sometimes it's more like 3/4 of them are glitch lines. You almost have to pick Blitz lines if you want to be part of the contest. I have waited until 1 minute before the game hoping that the glitch line would go away and finally taking the glitch line because I wanted to have a pick on that game. I think I got one today when I took Minnesota plus 133 in MLB. I wish I could take it back but maybe they will void it. I just hope they fix it soon.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.