• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Gaming Industry - US

    Another forum in the works on bailout for beted clients

    «First Previous 8910 ... 91011 Next Last»
    richsox24
    Freedom@Stake
    Lou
    esplanade
    michael_coolman
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 17751
    Posts: 263
    «First Previous 8910 ... 91011 Next Last»
     
    richsox24
    richsox24
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 216
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2011 - 11:17 PM ET #176

    I understand what you are saying Freedom but from where all the players sit...covers is saying one thing, sbr is saying another.  Obviously one forum is lying through their teeth.  I dont know which it is, nor do i really care.  Im not sure what Dozier has to gain by claiming he sent you an email. 

    Either way, I just hope the bailout gets implemented in the next couple days.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I understand what you are saying Freedom but from where all the players sit...covers is saying one thing, sbr is saying another.  Obviously one forum is lying through their teeth.  I dont know which it is, nor do i really care.  Im not sure what Dozier has to gain by claiming he sent you an email. 

    Either way, I just hope the bailout gets implemented in the next couple days.

     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2011 - 11:38 PM ET #177

    No problem, rich. I understand your view.

    I don't know why he'd claim that either. It's an odd thing to claim. I don't even think he knows my email anyway, and I know he hasn't contacted anybody else on our team. I asked after reading that post.

    Like I said, these are trying times for companies that target the American market and people are doing desperate things to get those betED players into their preferred operations where they can profit cheaply.

    I will say one thing: If everybody really was looking out for the best outcome for the players, wouldn't it make sense to allow betED to negotiate their best deal possible with their preferred choice, rather than going around trying to subvert existing negotiations with rumors and innuendo? How does that help the players? 

    If anything, it just makes the negotiations drag on forever while putting the squeeze on betED to work with specific partners instead of somebody they trust and is offering the best deal.

    If anything, I think this situation shows that maybe, just maybe, certain forums that claim to be strictly in it for the players might just have some hidden agendas that are not always in the players' best interests.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    No problem, rich. I understand your view.

    I don't know why he'd claim that either. It's an odd thing to claim. I don't even think he knows my email anyway, and I know he hasn't contacted anybody else on our team. I asked after reading that post.

    Like I said, these are trying times for companies that target the American market and people are doing desperate things to get those betED players into their preferred operations where they can profit cheaply.

    I will say one thing: If everybody really was looking out for the best outcome for the players, wouldn't it make sense to allow betED to negotiate their best deal possible with their preferred choice, rather than going around trying to subvert existing negotiations with rumors and innuendo? How does that help the players? 

    If anything, it just makes the negotiations drag on forever while putting the squeeze on betED to work with specific partners instead of somebody they trust and is offering the best deal.

    If anything, I think this situation shows that maybe, just maybe, certain forums that claim to be strictly in it for the players might just have some hidden agendas that are not always in the players' best interests.
     
    Lou
    Lou
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2001
    Posts: 4487
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2011 - 11:51 PM ET #178

    Didn't contact me either.

    What a strange thing to stake your reputation on.

    Strange times.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Didn't contact me either.

    What a strange thing to stake your reputation on.

    Strange times.
     
    esplanade
    esplanade
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 9021
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2011 - 11:52 PM ET #179

    The problem is: who is to say that the deal that is best for Beted is even remotely good for the players?? It's not like they carpetbagged out of town in the middle of the night...........................................



    So we've basically been hanging out in the dark without any real advocate. I don't think Bill Dozer has done any bashing of you guys, but honestly we would be lemmings if we accepted any single parties word hook, line, and sinker at this point.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The problem is: who is to say that the deal that is best for Beted is even remotely good for the players?? It's not like they carpetbagged out of town in the middle of the night...........................................



    So we've basically been hanging out in the dark without any real advocate. I don't think Bill Dozer has done any bashing of you guys, but honestly we would be lemmings if we accepted any single parties word hook, line, and sinker at this point.
     
    Lou
    Lou
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2001
    Posts: 4487
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:02 AM ET #180

    esplanade, nothing personal, but I hate your avatar.

    Even when you make sense, it makes you look like you are screaming to make a point.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    esplanade, nothing personal, but I hate your avatar.

    Even when you make sense, it makes you look like you are screaming to make a point.

     
    richsox24
    richsox24
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 216
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:03 AM ET #181

    Freedom...while i hope the bailout deal is good for all partied involved.  I think beted being ahppy with the deal should obviously take a back seat to the players being happy...after all they are the ones who packed up and ran without any communication at all with the players.  Would you agree with that? 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Freedom...while i hope the bailout deal is good for all partied involved.  I think beted being ahppy with the deal should obviously take a back seat to the players being happy...after all they are the ones who packed up and ran without any communication at all with the players.  Would you agree with that? 
     
    michael_coolman
    michael_coolman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 1462
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:12 AM ET #182

    Quote Originally Posted by richsox24:

    Freedom...while i hope the bailout deal is good for all partied involved.  I think beted being ahppy with the deal should obviously take a back seat to the players being happy...after all they are the ones who packed up and ran without any communication at all with the players.  Would you agree with that? 
    I COMPLETELY AGREE, nice post!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by richsox24:

    Freedom...while i hope the bailout deal is good for all partied involved.  I think beted being ahppy with the deal should obviously take a back seat to the players being happy...after all they are the ones who packed up and ran without any communication at all with the players.  Would you agree with that? 
    I COMPLETELY AGREE, nice post!
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:15 AM ET #183

    Yes, of course the players come first, but you miss my point.

    I'm saying that betED had the open floor, made their choice of a partner and are now negotiating in a free market.

    But if the situation gets dragged on while betED gets publicly extorted so to only deal with the one or two preferred operations of one particular forum, well what's the likelihood that anybody will get a good deal in that situation?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yes, of course the players come first, but you miss my point.

    I'm saying that betED had the open floor, made their choice of a partner and are now negotiating in a free market.

    But if the situation gets dragged on while betED gets publicly extorted so to only deal with the one or two preferred operations of one particular forum, well what's the likelihood that anybody will get a good deal in that situation?
     
    esplanade
    esplanade
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 9021
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:29 AM ET #184

    OK Lou, I'll change it for you.................
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    OK Lou, I'll change it for you.................
     
    Mikie2Times
    Mikie2Times
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 130
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:38 AM ET #185

    Freedom or Lou, can you please respond to this simple question. You will have to excuse me if it was asked already. 

    Covers knew processing instant banking transactions with American clients was against the UIGEA, that is obvious even to a recreational player. Covers knew BetED was one of the books giving Americans this option. Several other preferred books for covers also offered such options like Sports Interaction. 

    This did not raise any concern with the Covers staff even after the poker seizures? 

    In an article written by Covers shortly after they said this funding practice was money laundering. So it seems like Covers knew what to call it after the fact, but didn't have any problem promoting the site prior to the seizure. So they did not know BetED was actively engaging in money laundering prior to the seizure? What else could it be interpreted as?

    People, companies, they make mistakes. Especially when faced with difficult PR situations. It's good how Covers is trying to help facilitate this deal and keep the public informed. I guess I'm just stumped that they couldn't see the writing on the well. It doesn't make any sense. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Freedom or Lou, can you please respond to this simple question. You will have to excuse me if it was asked already. 

    Covers knew processing instant banking transactions with American clients was against the UIGEA, that is obvious even to a recreational player. Covers knew BetED was one of the books giving Americans this option. Several other preferred books for covers also offered such options like Sports Interaction. 

    This did not raise any concern with the Covers staff even after the poker seizures? 

    In an article written by Covers shortly after they said this funding practice was money laundering. So it seems like Covers knew what to call it after the fact, but didn't have any problem promoting the site prior to the seizure. So they did not know BetED was actively engaging in money laundering prior to the seizure? What else could it be interpreted as?

    People, companies, they make mistakes. Especially when faced with difficult PR situations. It's good how Covers is trying to help facilitate this deal and keep the public informed. I guess I'm just stumped that they couldn't see the writing on the well. It doesn't make any sense. 
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:52 AM ET #186

    Mikie, it's hard to argue against your point. But I will try...

    The poker situations were one thing. In some circumstances they actually owned the banks and processing companies involved, so it was an egregious situation they were undertaking which nobody on our realized because nobody knew the lengths they were going to.

    Plus, with the fact that poker is bound to be legalized sooner or later, there was another reason to assume it was an isolated incident as the government was kneecapping the "illegal" poker sites to level the field before the industry gets regulated.

    Remember as well, this is a mirror-image situation where it all depends on where you are standing.

    It's only money laundering if the company in question is breaking the law. Well, if these companies were operating in legal jurisdictions where its not illegal to do what they were doing, were they actually breaking any laws? An argument could be said that they were not.

    Furthermore, the WTO has ruled that the American government's stance against online gambling is, in fact, illegal. If anything, it's the government who has been breaking more laws than the sportsbooks.

    It's only when you look at it from the one particular point of view of the US authorities that laws have been broken, and therefore money laundering can only be considered as a crime from that point.

    So, should we have seen it? Maybe. But it didn't look very likely.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mikie, it's hard to argue against your point. But I will try...

    The poker situations were one thing. In some circumstances they actually owned the banks and processing companies involved, so it was an egregious situation they were undertaking which nobody on our realized because nobody knew the lengths they were going to.

    Plus, with the fact that poker is bound to be legalized sooner or later, there was another reason to assume it was an isolated incident as the government was kneecapping the "illegal" poker sites to level the field before the industry gets regulated.

    Remember as well, this is a mirror-image situation where it all depends on where you are standing.

    It's only money laundering if the company in question is breaking the law. Well, if these companies were operating in legal jurisdictions where its not illegal to do what they were doing, were they actually breaking any laws? An argument could be said that they were not.

    Furthermore, the WTO has ruled that the American government's stance against online gambling is, in fact, illegal. If anything, it's the government who has been breaking more laws than the sportsbooks.

    It's only when you look at it from the one particular point of view of the US authorities that laws have been broken, and therefore money laundering can only be considered as a crime from that point.

    So, should we have seen it? Maybe. But it didn't look very likely.
     
    Mikie2Times
    Mikie2Times
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 130
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 2:46 AM ET #187

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom@Stake:

    Mikie, it's hard to argue against your point. But I will try...

    The poker situations were one thing. In some circumstances they actually owned the banks and processing companies involved, so it was an egregious situation they were undertaking which nobody on our realized because nobody knew the lengths they were going to.

    Plus, with the fact that poker is bound to be legalized sooner or later, there was another reason to assume it was an isolated incident as the government was kneecapping the "illegal" poker sites to level the field before the industry gets regulated.

    Remember as well, this is a mirror-image situation where it all depends on where you are standing.

    It's only money laundering if the company in question is breaking the law. Well, if these companies were operating in legal jurisdictions where its not illegal to do what they were doing, were they actually breaking any laws? An argument could be said that they were not.

    Furthermore, the WTO has ruled that the American government's stance against online gambling is, in fact, illegal. If anything, it's the government who has been breaking more laws than the sportsbooks.

    It's only when you look at it from the one particular point of view of the US authorities that laws have been broken, and therefore money laundering can only be considered as a crime from that point.

    So, should we have seen it? Maybe. But it didn't look very likely.

    Fair enough Freedom. I was pretty harsh in a previous post, but I'm a professional, so I'm fully aware of the complexity's at hand and I express my apologies for being so aggressive in my statements. I've used Covers since the beginning and will always use Covers. In my shoes I always felt, hey, I know something weird has to be going on that can allow Americans instant funding. I felt pretty comfortable in assuming the transactions were being processed to appear to be other types of transactions. At the same time I will say beyond any doubt, that I did not expect the Feds to attack in the manner in which they have. Certainly not under a Democratic president. I mean Kyle was the one who really started this legislation, and it's always been primarily backed by Republicans. I also see the point on Poker vs Sports, as I can never envision a legalization of sports but feel poker will come soon. So I suppose it's understandable to line that seizure with the Feds opening the door to such a legalization down the road, vs a full out assault on the entire industry. I'm thinking part of these raids are heavily based on the American deficits. They don't want our money leaving the country to wager, and they don't feel comfortable with the large scale Tax evasion that comes with it.

    In your professional opinion, is the Climate still OK for the industries bigger players? For example I've used Bet Jamaica heavily in the past, great pay outs response. I would like to consider them now that ACH is basically done, it just boil down to who I can trust is the safest. Would you bet BJ on that list? If not who would you put on such a list? 

    Best Regards,
    Mike
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom@Stake:

    Mikie, it's hard to argue against your point. But I will try...

    The poker situations were one thing. In some circumstances they actually owned the banks and processing companies involved, so it was an egregious situation they were undertaking which nobody on our realized because nobody knew the lengths they were going to.

    Plus, with the fact that poker is bound to be legalized sooner or later, there was another reason to assume it was an isolated incident as the government was kneecapping the "illegal" poker sites to level the field before the industry gets regulated.

    Remember as well, this is a mirror-image situation where it all depends on where you are standing.

    It's only money laundering if the company in question is breaking the law. Well, if these companies were operating in legal jurisdictions where its not illegal to do what they were doing, were they actually breaking any laws? An argument could be said that they were not.

    Furthermore, the WTO has ruled that the American government's stance against online gambling is, in fact, illegal. If anything, it's the government who has been breaking more laws than the sportsbooks.

    It's only when you look at it from the one particular point of view of the US authorities that laws have been broken, and therefore money laundering can only be considered as a crime from that point.

    So, should we have seen it? Maybe. But it didn't look very likely.

    Fair enough Freedom. I was pretty harsh in a previous post, but I'm a professional, so I'm fully aware of the complexity's at hand and I express my apologies for being so aggressive in my statements. I've used Covers since the beginning and will always use Covers. In my shoes I always felt, hey, I know something weird has to be going on that can allow Americans instant funding. I felt pretty comfortable in assuming the transactions were being processed to appear to be other types of transactions. At the same time I will say beyond any doubt, that I did not expect the Feds to attack in the manner in which they have. Certainly not under a Democratic president. I mean Kyle was the one who really started this legislation, and it's always been primarily backed by Republicans. I also see the point on Poker vs Sports, as I can never envision a legalization of sports but feel poker will come soon. So I suppose it's understandable to line that seizure with the Feds opening the door to such a legalization down the road, vs a full out assault on the entire industry. I'm thinking part of these raids are heavily based on the American deficits. They don't want our money leaving the country to wager, and they don't feel comfortable with the large scale Tax evasion that comes with it.

    In your professional opinion, is the Climate still OK for the industries bigger players? For example I've used Bet Jamaica heavily in the past, great pay outs response. I would like to consider them now that ACH is basically done, it just boil down to who I can trust is the safest. Would you bet BJ on that list? If not who would you put on such a list? 

    Best Regards,
    Mike
     
    Lou
    Lou
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2001
    Posts: 4487
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 8:02 AM ET #188

    Mike,

    I think I can speak for Freedom when I say that we think the current sites should be mostly safe, but really as Freedom's article (the one you mention) states, nothing is 100% safe anymore so you have to be smart and protect yourself a bit.

    But there are some people in the industry who have been going decades now without being shut down. They were doing it back even before the internet in some cases.

    That's one thing about the betED situation... people were getting a bit lax. I personally met people in places like Canada and the UK for meetings, which probably wasn't a great idea for them in retrospect, but they felt reasonably safe.

    Probably 75% of the industry was going to make some sort of presence at that Dublin conference, but Black Friday scared them away.

    Now, those guys have once again closed ranks and bunkered down. So you can be fairly certain that - even if it might get a bit inconvenient sometimes - it's unlikely they will ever get shut down completely.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mike,

    I think I can speak for Freedom when I say that we think the current sites should be mostly safe, but really as Freedom's article (the one you mention) states, nothing is 100% safe anymore so you have to be smart and protect yourself a bit.

    But there are some people in the industry who have been going decades now without being shut down. They were doing it back even before the internet in some cases.

    That's one thing about the betED situation... people were getting a bit lax. I personally met people in places like Canada and the UK for meetings, which probably wasn't a great idea for them in retrospect, but they felt reasonably safe.

    Probably 75% of the industry was going to make some sort of presence at that Dublin conference, but Black Friday scared them away.

    Now, those guys have once again closed ranks and bunkered down. So you can be fairly certain that - even if it might get a bit inconvenient sometimes - it's unlikely they will ever get shut down completely.
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 8:34 AM ET #189

    Update: We did find somebody who received an email from Dozier. Thank God. I thought he was losing it.

    That being said, it doesn't contain anything we didn't know. Lot's of people are coming out of the woodwork saying they had fantastic offers that betED.

    That's the problem with a non-public process. There's no way to tell which guys are full of crap and just bitter, from the guys who have a legitimate beef. Plus there might be some great operations making shitty offers or some shitty operations making great offers - that you can only trust so much.

    All I can say is that I was assured that all offers were taken seriously and they chose the best combination of offer/operator they could find and are getting to brass tacks. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if one of the sites that was originally complaining to Dozier turns out to be the one.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Update: We did find somebody who received an email from Dozier. Thank God. I thought he was losing it.

    That being said, it doesn't contain anything we didn't know. Lot's of people are coming out of the woodwork saying they had fantastic offers that betED.

    That's the problem with a non-public process. There's no way to tell which guys are full of crap and just bitter, from the guys who have a legitimate beef. Plus there might be some great operations making shitty offers or some shitty operations making great offers - that you can only trust so much.

    All I can say is that I was assured that all offers were taken seriously and they chose the best combination of offer/operator they could find and are getting to brass tacks. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if one of the sites that was originally complaining to Dozier turns out to be the one.
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 8:37 AM ET #190

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom@Stake:

     

    That being said, it doesn't contain anything we didn't know. Lot's of people are coming out of the woodwork saying they had fantastic offers that betED.


    I meant to say "that betED didn't respond to."
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom@Stake:

     

    That being said, it doesn't contain anything we didn't know. Lot's of people are coming out of the woodwork saying they had fantastic offers that betED.


    I meant to say "that betED didn't respond to."
     
    michael_coolman
    michael_coolman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 1462
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 8:44 AM ET #191

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom@Stake:

    Update: We did find somebody who received an email from Dozier. Thank God. I thought he was losing it.

    That being said, it doesn't contain anything we didn't know. Lot's of people are coming out of the woodwork saying they had fantastic offers that betED.

    That's the problem with a non-public process. There's no way to tell which guys are full of crap and just bitter, from the guys who have a legitimate beef. Plus there might be some great operations making shitty offers or some shitty operations making great offers - that you can only trust so much.

    All I can say is that I was assured that all offers were taken seriously and they chose the best combination of offer/operator they could find and are getting to brass tacks. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if one of the sites that was originally complaining to Dozier turns out to be the one.

    Can we assume this is a done deal? I will expect to hear news today.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom@Stake:

    Update: We did find somebody who received an email from Dozier. Thank God. I thought he was losing it.

    That being said, it doesn't contain anything we didn't know. Lot's of people are coming out of the woodwork saying they had fantastic offers that betED.

    That's the problem with a non-public process. There's no way to tell which guys are full of crap and just bitter, from the guys who have a legitimate beef. Plus there might be some great operations making shitty offers or some shitty operations making great offers - that you can only trust so much.

    All I can say is that I was assured that all offers were taken seriously and they chose the best combination of offer/operator they could find and are getting to brass tacks. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if one of the sites that was originally complaining to Dozier turns out to be the one.

    Can we assume this is a done deal? I will expect to hear news today.

     
    MRSARATOGA
    MRSARATOGA
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 14413
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 8:46 AM ET #192

    Dozier does bring up one good point in that other books who have been taken have still made good on paying and did not throw in the towel and still had a pool of money to stay in business and continue operations. Beted may have been living by the seat of its pants without immensely deep pockets and unable to combat something like this the way others could.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Dozier does bring up one good point in that other books who have been taken have still made good on paying and did not throw in the towel and still had a pool of money to stay in business and continue operations. Beted may have been living by the seat of its pants without immensely deep pockets and unable to combat something like this the way others could.
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 8:51 AM ET #193

    michael, what I hear is that they have a preferred partner that they have been negotiating with and it's in the due diligence phase now.

    I hope to hear something today, but it's really about how long it takes for the purchaser to make a decision - and it's a big decision.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    michael, what I hear is that they have a preferred partner that they have been negotiating with and it's in the due diligence phase now.

    I hope to hear something today, but it's really about how long it takes for the purchaser to make a decision - and it's a big decision.
     
    SnotBoogy
    SnotBoogy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2010
    Posts: 1460
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 10:08 AM ET #194

    so does it look/sound like there was a setback, or is it still just the same - on hold for word of an agreement?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    so does it look/sound like there was a setback, or is it still just the same - on hold for word of an agreement?
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 10:28 AM ET #195

    As far as I know, it's still a "Go", but the due diligence is just taking time.

    Frankly, I think this makes perfect sense from the purchaser's point of view. Our source for the "quick" optimism might have had their judgement clouded by irrational exuberance, as the saying goes.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    As far as I know, it's still a "Go", but the due diligence is just taking time.

    Frankly, I think this makes perfect sense from the purchaser's point of view. Our source for the "quick" optimism might have had their judgement clouded by irrational exuberance, as the saying goes.
     
    thehorsemen2
    thehorsemen2
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 106
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 11:10 AM ET #196

    So what do you think is the hold up ?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    So what do you think is the hold up ?
     
    Freedom@Stake
    Freedom@Stake
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 1995
    Posts: 363
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 11:30 AM ET #197

    Heard is was just due diligence. The purchaser wants to be sure they are buying a real customer list and not something that's just crap that looks good but is worthless.

    So, you've got to request a sample of this and a sample of that, but you can't get the whole thing because that's what's for sale.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Heard is was just due diligence. The purchaser wants to be sure they are buying a real customer list and not something that's just crap that looks good but is worthless.

    So, you've got to request a sample of this and a sample of that, but you can't get the whole thing because that's what's for sale.
     
    SnotBoogy
    SnotBoogy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2010
    Posts: 1460
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:15 PM ET #198

    odds of a bailout this week (by friday midnight / sat morning 12:01 am)

    yes it happens +900
    no it doesn't (or no word of one) -1200
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    odds of a bailout this week (by friday midnight / sat morning 12:01 am)

    yes it happens +900
    no it doesn't (or no word of one) -1200
     
    richsox24
    richsox24
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 216
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 12:22 PM ET #199

    Quote Originally Posted by SnotBoogy:

    odds of a bailout this week (by friday midnight / sat morning 12:01 am)

    yes it happens +900
    no it doesn't (or no word of one) -1200

    Well, since Lou said in the other thread that he thought the bailout announcement would be by Tuesday and as of right now, its Wednesday, I gotta think the bailout announcement will happen today or at worst case, tomorrow. 

    Lets just keep our fingers crossed

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SnotBoogy:

    odds of a bailout this week (by friday midnight / sat morning 12:01 am)

    yes it happens +900
    no it doesn't (or no word of one) -1200

    Well, since Lou said in the other thread that he thought the bailout announcement would be by Tuesday and as of right now, its Wednesday, I gotta think the bailout announcement will happen today or at worst case, tomorrow. 

    Lets just keep our fingers crossed

     

     
     
    SnotBoogy
    SnotBoogy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2010
    Posts: 1460
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2011 - 1:35 PM ET #200

    Quote Originally Posted by richsox24:

    Well, since Lou said in the other thread that he thought the bailout announcement would be by Tuesday and as of right now, its Wednesday, I gotta think the bailout announcement will happen today or at worst case, tomorrow. 

    Lets just keep our fingers crossed

     


    so you think the fact that it was said somethign would be announced early this week INCREASES the likelihood that it would, when it's midday wednesday and it hasn't?

    interesting
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by richsox24:

    Well, since Lou said in the other thread that he thought the bailout announcement would be by Tuesday and as of right now, its Wednesday, I gotta think the bailout announcement will happen today or at worst case, tomorrow. 

    Lets just keep our fingers crossed

     


    so you think the fact that it was said somethign would be announced early this week INCREASES the likelihood that it would, when it's midday wednesday and it hasn't?

    interesting
    All Forums | Gaming Industry - US
    «First Previous 8910 ... 91011 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,784 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/08/2026 977 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,247 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 3,958 Covers arrow
    • 9/8 POD 🔥🔥???? 3,453 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,834 Covers arrow
    • Breathtaking ....truly 20,479 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,699 Covers arrow
    • Obviously the true face of the republican party 30,558 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 216 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.