4 Team - Parlay
#231 - Nebraska/Arizona U o20 (-120) 1st Half
#227 - Bowling Green/Idaho o34½ (-120) 2nd Half
#719 - Los Angeles Clippers/Portland Trailblazers o190 (-110)
|
$200.00 | $2,198.10 |
4 Team - Parlay
#231 - Nebraska/Arizona U o20 (-120) 1st Half
#227 - Bowling Green/Idaho o34½ (-120) 2nd Half
#719 - Los Angeles Clippers/Portland Trailblazers o190 (-110)
|
$200.00 | $2,198.10 |
Huge Ballz, this will be the last time I respond to you.
First, it is ridiculous that you continue to harp on the fact that I buy points when I bet. Why does it make a difference to you whether I choose to buy points? Does it really make me a dumbass that buy points?
Second, I never onced used the term "EV" to justify buying points and why does it make a difference whether I use "qualititative analogies". I shouldn't have to justify why I buy points in the first place.
Oh and yeah... I saw that in an effort to sound intelligent you tried using advanced termonology like "risk reduction","marginal utility" or "progressive reverse martingale".
Quit trying to sound intelligent and realize that you aren't fooling anyone! If you are going to try to use all these big words you should at least be able to use them correctly. You probably don't realize that "marginal utility" can't be used as a "qualitative analogy". Just to let you know, marginal utility is a term used in economics as a theory of "diminishing marginal returns". Utility is actually a concept that is quantitative because it can be measured as increasing or diminishing. Get a fuckin clue!
I could care less what degree you are pursuing because you sound like a complete MORON! Yeah, for got to mention that. "Moron" is spelled with an O.
![]()
![]()
"Utility" can be qualitative because it could be something that you don't need to measure. "The next dollar earned is worth more than my current dollar" or "The next X dollars are worth nothing and are useless unless I earn Y dollars".
"I am still up almost 28 units which I will be putting all at risk today."
As I said before, it doesn't take long for luckbox clowns like this guy to lose it all in one shot. Thanks for proving my point.
Huge Ballz, this will be the last time I respond to you.
First, it is ridiculous that you continue to harp on the fact that I buy points when I bet. Why does it make a difference to you whether I choose to buy points? Does it really make me a dumbass that buy points?
Second, I never onced used the term "EV" to justify buying points and why does it make a difference whether I use "qualititative analogies". I shouldn't have to justify why I buy points in the first place.
Oh and yeah... I saw that in an effort to sound intelligent you tried using advanced termonology like "risk reduction","marginal utility" or "progressive reverse martingale".
Quit trying to sound intelligent and realize that you aren't fooling anyone! If you are going to try to use all these big words you should at least be able to use them correctly. You probably don't realize that "marginal utility" can't be used as a "qualitative analogy". Just to let you know, marginal utility is a term used in economics as a theory of "diminishing marginal returns". Utility is actually a concept that is quantitative because it can be measured as increasing or diminishing. Get a fuckin clue!
I could care less what degree you are pursuing because you sound like a complete MORON! Yeah, for got to mention that. "Moron" is spelled with an O.
![]()
![]()
"Utility" can be qualitative because it could be something that you don't need to measure. "The next dollar earned is worth more than my current dollar" or "The next X dollars are worth nothing and are useless unless I earn Y dollars".
"I am still up almost 28 units which I will be putting all at risk today."
As I said before, it doesn't take long for luckbox clowns like this guy to lose it all in one shot. Thanks for proving my point.
Bowl Record (9-4) +27.55 units
Terrible day yesterday losing almost 19 units. Good thing is I am still up almost 28 units which I will be putting all at risk today. Wish me luck!
Air Force +5 (440 to win 400)
I backed Air Force last year in this same bowl and remember being very pissed off. In that game, Air force missed two field goals and Houston ended up covering the spread by two points. Well, I am backing Air Force again this year. Comparing the 2009 and 2008 teams, I think that Air Force has greatly improved. After last year's bowl defeat, I can only imagine that the Air Force players can't wait to play Houston again.
On the other side, I question whether Houston has any motivation for this matchup. Houston was ranked in the top 15 for a chunk of the season and ff it weren't for the upset loss in their Conference USA championship game, Houston would be playing in a much bigger bowl. In my opinion, that is pretty disappointing and I think it will show.
Missouri - 6 (480 to win 400)
Although it was a rebuilding season for Missouri, they were still able to finish with an 8-4 record. Of their four losses, three were consecutively schedule games to Nebraska, Oklahoma St, and Texas. Navy played extremely well throughout the year but I think they have a tough match up here. Missouri boasts the 12th best rushing defense in the country and Navy heavily relies on their rushing attack. I think Missouri will be able to move the ball at will and win easily.
Oklahoma Sooners -10 (770 to win 700)
There seems to be a lot of hype in this game for Stanford since Toby Gerhart ranked second in Heisman voting. Gerhart is a great back but I don't think he has ever played against a defense as physical as Oklahoma's. A lot of Stanford's success came from Andrew Luck's ability as a mobile QB. Well, Luck will most likely be out this game due to surgery. Without a dual threat, I think Oklahoma's physical defense will be able to shut down Stanford and dominate this game from start to finish.
Virginia Tech -5 (1320 to win 1100)
I really like Virginia Tech in this match up. The hokies are 0-4 in their last four games against SEC opponents and have all the motivation in the world to finally win. One of Virginia tech's biggest strengths is their special teams and special teams is one of Tennessee's weak spots. While Virginia Tech will definitely be amped to play in this game, I question whether Tennessee will be. Tennessee has three players who are set to enter the NFL next season and after all the off-field drama going on with the program, I question how focused they will be. I look for Virginia Tech to get the W here and cover.
There you have it. All my profits are in and all I can do now is watch the roll get bigger or go back to the drawing board. ![]()
Bowl Record (9-4) +27.55 units
Terrible day yesterday losing almost 19 units. Good thing is I am still up almost 28 units which I will be putting all at risk today. Wish me luck!
Air Force +5 (440 to win 400)
I backed Air Force last year in this same bowl and remember being very pissed off. In that game, Air force missed two field goals and Houston ended up covering the spread by two points. Well, I am backing Air Force again this year. Comparing the 2009 and 2008 teams, I think that Air Force has greatly improved. After last year's bowl defeat, I can only imagine that the Air Force players can't wait to play Houston again.
On the other side, I question whether Houston has any motivation for this matchup. Houston was ranked in the top 15 for a chunk of the season and ff it weren't for the upset loss in their Conference USA championship game, Houston would be playing in a much bigger bowl. In my opinion, that is pretty disappointing and I think it will show.
Missouri - 6 (480 to win 400)
Although it was a rebuilding season for Missouri, they were still able to finish with an 8-4 record. Of their four losses, three were consecutively schedule games to Nebraska, Oklahoma St, and Texas. Navy played extremely well throughout the year but I think they have a tough match up here. Missouri boasts the 12th best rushing defense in the country and Navy heavily relies on their rushing attack. I think Missouri will be able to move the ball at will and win easily.
Oklahoma Sooners -10 (770 to win 700)
There seems to be a lot of hype in this game for Stanford since Toby Gerhart ranked second in Heisman voting. Gerhart is a great back but I don't think he has ever played against a defense as physical as Oklahoma's. A lot of Stanford's success came from Andrew Luck's ability as a mobile QB. Well, Luck will most likely be out this game due to surgery. Without a dual threat, I think Oklahoma's physical defense will be able to shut down Stanford and dominate this game from start to finish.
Virginia Tech -5 (1320 to win 1100)
I really like Virginia Tech in this match up. The hokies are 0-4 in their last four games against SEC opponents and have all the motivation in the world to finally win. One of Virginia tech's biggest strengths is their special teams and special teams is one of Tennessee's weak spots. While Virginia Tech will definitely be amped to play in this game, I question whether Tennessee will be. Tennessee has three players who are set to enter the NFL next season and after all the off-field drama going on with the program, I question how focused they will be. I look for Virginia Tech to get the W here and cover.
There you have it. All my profits are in and all I can do now is watch the roll get bigger or go back to the drawing board. ![]()
Hugeballz. Good luck on your picks man. I am honestly done arguing with people on this forum. I am just tired of all the negativity. I am just here to make money and help others make money. Clown on me all you want when I lose, I am just going to ignore you from now on. Air Force starting my day off right
Hugeballz. Good luck on your picks man. I am honestly done arguing with people on this forum. I am just tired of all the negativity. I am just here to make money and help others make money. Clown on me all you want when I lose, I am just going to ignore you from now on. Air Force starting my day off right
Bowl Record (9-4) +27.55 units
Adding 2 units to Oklahoma -10 making it a 9 unit play.
Pending... Air Force +5 (440 to win 400)
Missouri - 6 (480 to win 400)
Oklahoma Sooners -10 (990 to win 900)
Virginia Tech -5 (1320 to win 1100)
Bowl Record (9-4) +27.55 units
Adding 2 units to Oklahoma -10 making it a 9 unit play.
Pending... Air Force +5 (440 to win 400)
Missouri - 6 (480 to win 400)
Oklahoma Sooners -10 (990 to win 900)
Virginia Tech -5 (1320 to win 1100)
OU ![]()
This is the reason why you shouldn't talk like you were an expert with the ability to make people money.
OU ![]()
This is the reason why you shouldn't talk like you were an expert with the ability to make people money.
OU ![]()
This is the reason why you shouldn't talk like you were an expert with the ability to make people money.
OU ![]()
This is the reason why you shouldn't talk like you were an expert with the ability to make people money.
pfffff I'm out. Have fun losing your bankroll on new year's eve. Should've cashed out.
I hope for your sake VA-Tech covers AND you cash out, else the bookie will be laughing in your face.
Happened to me before. I had a $5900 balance, they wouldn't let me cash out because there was a 10-day hold, only 2 days left and I lost everything. Lesson learned. Never returned to that book again.
pfffff I'm out. Have fun losing your bankroll on new year's eve. Should've cashed out.
I hope for your sake VA-Tech covers AND you cash out, else the bookie will be laughing in your face.
Happened to me before. I had a $5900 balance, they wouldn't let me cash out because there was a 10-day hold, only 2 days left and I lost everything. Lesson learned. Never returned to that book again.
Bowl Record (10-5) +20.85 units
Air Force +5 (4 units) ![]()
Oklahoma -10 (-9.9 units)
TOUGH LOSS
Oklahoma 2nd half -7 (4units) ![]()
Missouri -6 (-4.8 units) ![]()
Bad day so far losing around 7 units. ![]()
Hopefully the night game can make this a profitable day for me.
Won't be around tonight because I will be partying my ass off celebrating the New Years.
Hope everyone has a good one! ![]()
Bowl Record (10-5) +20.85 units
Air Force +5 (4 units) ![]()
Oklahoma -10 (-9.9 units)
TOUGH LOSS
Oklahoma 2nd half -7 (4units) ![]()
Missouri -6 (-4.8 units) ![]()
Bad day so far losing around 7 units. ![]()
Hopefully the night game can make this a profitable day for me.
Won't be around tonight because I will be partying my ass off celebrating the New Years.
Hope everyone has a good one! ![]()
Updated Bowl Record (11-5) +31.85 units
Large Plays (3-1)
Woke up with a major hangover but it's all good because Virginia Tech covered bringing me back into the positive for the day. I see that today's card is packed so I will get started on it right now.
Be back to post before the first kickoff.
Updated Bowl Record (11-5) +31.85 units
Large Plays (3-1)
Woke up with a major hangover but it's all good because Virginia Tech covered bringing me back into the positive for the day. I see that today's card is packed so I will get started on it right now.
Be back to post before the first kickoff.
Updated Bowl Record (11-5) +31.85 units
Large Plays (3-1)
Woke up with a major hangover but it's all good because Virginia Tech covered bringing me back into the positive for the day. I see that today's card is packed so I will get started on it right now.
Be back to post before the first kickoff.
Me too bro! ![]()
Updated Bowl Record (11-5) +31.85 units
Large Plays (3-1)
Woke up with a major hangover but it's all good because Virginia Tech covered bringing me back into the positive for the day. I see that today's card is packed so I will get started on it right now.
Be back to post before the first kickoff.
Me too bro! ![]()
Auburn lookin good so far. I am heading out for the rest of the day guys but I just locked in my two other plays for the day.
I am going LARGE on OREGON and CINCINNATI. Both for 10 units. ![]()
Wish me luck! ![]()
Auburn lookin good so far. I am heading out for the rest of the day guys but I just locked in my two other plays for the day.
I am going LARGE on OREGON and CINCINNATI. Both for 10 units. ![]()
Wish me luck! ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.