Boom_Boom... please give me some advice? TY : 7 team
6pts teaser, (NFL; San diego -2.5, New England -1,)(NCAAF wisconsin -14.5, stanford -15, arkansas -30, Tenn pk, Oregon -20.5)
Boom_Boom... please give me some advice? TY : 7 team
6pts teaser, (NFL; San diego -2.5, New England -1,)(NCAAF wisconsin -14.5, stanford -15, arkansas -30, Tenn pk, Oregon -20.5)
Boom_Boom... please give me some advice? TY : 7 team
6pts teaser, (NFL; San diego -2.5, New England -1,)(NCAAF wisconsin -14.5, stanford -15, arkansas -30, Tenn pk, Oregon -20.5)
Boom_Boom... please give me some advice? TY : 7 team
6pts teaser, (NFL; San diego -2.5, New England -1,)(NCAAF wisconsin -14.5, stanford -15, arkansas -30, Tenn pk, Oregon -20.5)
Not really on any of those sides (opposite most), but I'm sure your totals will be as usual. Hopefully you can carry your week 1 momentum into this week.
Not really on any of those sides (opposite most), but I'm sure your totals will be as usual. Hopefully you can carry your week 1 momentum into this week.
Not really on any of those sides (opposite most), but I'm sure your totals will be as usual. Hopefully you can carry your week 1 momentum into this week.
Not really on any of those sides (opposite most), but I'm sure your totals will be as usual. Hopefully you can carry your week 1 momentum into this week.
Good to see someone else on Tennessee. I think Bray and his young, but very talented receiving corp with slice up this Bearcat secondary. Everyone talking about Cincy have a lot of returning starters back on defense, well guess what that doesn't mean they are any good. I know Florida is on deck, but Vols need to beat a BCS opponent at home in the non-con to prove they are on the way back up. Dooley should have them focused on this game. I am thinking somewhere along the lines of 38-24 Tennessee.
Good to see someone else on Tennessee. I think Bray and his young, but very talented receiving corp with slice up this Bearcat secondary. Everyone talking about Cincy have a lot of returning starters back on defense, well guess what that doesn't mean they are any good. I know Florida is on deck, but Vols need to beat a BCS opponent at home in the non-con to prove they are on the way back up. Dooley should have them focused on this game. I am thinking somewhere along the lines of 38-24 Tennessee.
Good to see someone else on Tennessee. I think Bray and his young, but very talented receiving corp with slice up this Bearcat secondary. Everyone talking about Cincy have a lot of returning starters back on defense, well guess what that doesn't mean they are any good. I know Florida is on deck, but Vols need to beat a BCS opponent at home in the non-con to prove they are on the way back up. Dooley should have them focused on this game. I am thinking somewhere along the lines of 38-24 Tennessee.
Good to see someone else on Tennessee. I think Bray and his young, but very talented receiving corp with slice up this Bearcat secondary. Everyone talking about Cincy have a lot of returning starters back on defense, well guess what that doesn't mean they are any good. I know Florida is on deck, but Vols need to beat a BCS opponent at home in the non-con to prove they are on the way back up. Dooley should have them focused on this game. I am thinking somewhere along the lines of 38-24 Tennessee.
Here is the link to my Bama @ Penn State write-up Boom!!! You even make a cameo appearance.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=33&sub=101125579
Here is the link to my Bama @ Penn State write-up Boom!!! You even make a cameo appearance.
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=33&sub=101125579
Really only Bama & NIU/Kansas. I really don't have a strong opinion on the other 3, although I'd probably side with Cincy if I could get 7. I didn't think the Vols looked great in week 1 (which could mean absolutely nothing).
Kansas has no run defense whatsoever (NIU's offensive strength). I was on NIU pretty big last week against Army (easy winner) for the same reason. I think the Huskies will run up and down the field on Kansas pretty much like they did on Army.
Because NIU should easily get into the 30s in this game, if I liked Kansas, I would just play OVER 60. I think it would be a safer play.
Bama will not be a big play for me, but I do like them enough to pull the trigger. I would be mildly surprised if Penn State finds the end zone in this game.
Really only Bama & NIU/Kansas. I really don't have a strong opinion on the other 3, although I'd probably side with Cincy if I could get 7. I didn't think the Vols looked great in week 1 (which could mean absolutely nothing).
Kansas has no run defense whatsoever (NIU's offensive strength). I was on NIU pretty big last week against Army (easy winner) for the same reason. I think the Huskies will run up and down the field on Kansas pretty much like they did on Army.
Because NIU should easily get into the 30s in this game, if I liked Kansas, I would just play OVER 60. I think it would be a safer play.
Bama will not be a big play for me, but I do like them enough to pull the trigger. I would be mildly surprised if Penn State finds the end zone in this game.
Boom, whats your thoughts on the BYU/Texas Over. I was actually leaning the opposite? thanks bro
Any thoughts for 2nite. Loving ASU -6.5 & FIU ttu22
Boom, whats your thoughts on the BYU/Texas Over. I was actually leaning the opposite? thanks bro
Any thoughts for 2nite. Loving ASU -6.5 & FIU ttu22
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.