All Forums | College Football

Ex Pro & Bookie on Rutgers Today

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13740
Posts: 132
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #51
2 dimes - Wake Forest +7 (bought the 0.5 point)

SEC Teams are 1-5 straight up in bowl games before New Year's last 2 years.  Tanner Price can sling it and Jim Grobe is a good coach.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #52
2 dimes - Wake Forest +7 (bought the 0.5 point)

SEC Teams are 1-5 straight up in bowl games before New Year's last 2 years.  Tanner Price can sling it and Jim Grobe is a good coach.  Watch for moneyline.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 1701
Posted: #53
with ya LocksmithSports...just do your thing, forget the clowns

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 554
Posted: #54

Good luck with your plays today LSS. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6706
Posted: #55

Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

gonna dress a few posts here, including a couple addressed to me...

Post #9... how could the UConn game have been a letdown game when Rutgers was playing for a chance at a BCS game???

Post #14... Rutgers is awful because they have one of the stupidest QBs i have ever witnessed... the guy is a mental invalid!  under no circumstances would i ever bet on a team led by a QB that bad in a bowl game...

Post #16... a pro move is understanding the importance of conference strength when it comes time to bet the Bowls!  Big 12 vs. Big East... you can bet on the Big 12 team, or stay away... betting on Rutgers is not a pro move here...

Post #19... key point made here by Shark... Rutgers has respectable defensive stats because they play against teams with horseshit offenses... if you are really buying that they have a great D, you are not looking deeply enough... which again, doesn't come across as a pro move...



just my opinion... not always right!

We saw how offense-challenged Texas was and they put 37 on them. My point is people will be able to put their arguments forth that favored them. All I heard is how Iowa St would kick Rutger's ass because hell, they beat Okl. St!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 263
Posted: #56
Love those demon deacons. Best of luck. Love those cougars too. Fake spike lol Tulsa is trash just like funkjr's analysis.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1472
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by LocksmithSports:


A pro move is the winning move.  Period.  And my track record, which you will see over time, is I make the pro move 65% of the time.
  65% of the time?  Right.  So much bullshit on here.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #58

Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

  65% of the time?  Right.  So much bullshit on here.

If you're 65% the pro-move is kicking back in the Mandalay Bay sports book, playing a little blackjack between games......and not giving a second thought about posting on covers.com your self-proclaimed 65% pro-moves horseshit.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14
Posted: #59

Quote Originally Posted by WFAN660:

btw what are you a former "pro" at??  gambling or playing??  I'm a former/current John.... I like to visit prostitutes on the reg

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3858
Posted: #60
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 836
Posted: #61
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1196
Posted: #62
2H action in Ruthers and Iowa St.?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #63

Quote Originally Posted by TheColorPurple:

 

Holy fuck I wanna take a brick and smach your avitar's face in

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #64
RUTGERS LOOKING GOOD
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 3476
Posted: #65
Again?  Really?  You strokes didn't get enough say yesterday?  Why do all you beat offs come out and make sarcastic comments every time a guy puts up plays with confidence?

It's really hard to tell if you guys are infants, or just angry beat offs.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

  65% of the time?  Right.  So much bullshit on here.

I don't need to argue.  Just track me long term.  The plays will speak for themselves.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 56254
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by LocksmithSports:


Was part of a syndicate that sold our plays to Vegas tourists for 3 years.  We did very well.  Just got tired of it.  Started booking action for 4 years.  Don't really do much of that anymore.  

Maybe I'll return and do it again someday and maybe I won't, for now just want to be on the other side of the fence and share some insight.
Good luck to you.  Welcome to the site.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by joewashington:

If you're 65% the pro-move is kicking back in the Mandalay Bay sports book, playing a little blackjack between games......and not giving a second thought about posting on covers.com your self-proclaimed 65% pro-moves horseshit.


Thanks but maybe that's your dream lifestyle.  I love when everyone tells me what the "pro-move" is.  I've been there and done that and not interested in sitting in a casino and sportsbook for the rest of my life.  I enjoy doing this from the comfort of my home now and want to try interacting with people on here. 

So far lots of bitter assumptions and not much chatting about the games themselves.   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 125
Posted: #69
There are good cappers on this site with pretty good input. But you will always get a fair share of shit heads. Keep up the good work. So far so good on the Scarlet Knights. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by funkjr:

There are good cappers on this site with pretty good input. But you will always get a fair share of shit heads. Keep up the good work. So far so good on the Scarlet Knights. 

Just looking to share what I'm playing and talk some football.  GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 3561
Posted: #71

GL Locksmith you were right on with the Rutgers pick

Iowa St sucks ballz, lol

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 185
Posted: #72
Love it, enough with all these faves covering.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3901
Posted: #73
Locksmith im on the OVER for the Wake/Miss game...? what you think?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 5526
Posted: #74
Iowa st just plain sucks, they play one game over their heads or Okast just didnt get up for that game,they didnt do anything all season.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 1257
Posted: #75
Good luck, Lock and welcome to this site.   
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.