2018 Bowl Under system... 37 - 3 in 2017... Lets Do it Again!
QUOTE Originally Posted by HarryKnutsak: Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page? same man.
Hey guys no clue whats going on with the thread... it like cut off?
QUOTE Originally Posted by HarryKnutsak: Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page? same man.
Hey guys no clue whats going on with the thread... it like cut off?
Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page?
I think mine was the last post, and I can't see anything either. Amazingly I just found my post in drafts (I was having all sorts of problems with the website), so I'll post it again.
Quote:
Hey guys. I don't have a dog in this hunt, except that I lost a unit on my own in the BSU-Ore first half. The worst bad beat among what looks to have been many today.
Anyway, I'm here having read the ridiculous crap that Roggs has to put up with for just sharing his picks, and I have a few observations. One is that the 37-3 is misleading because of how many units are won and lost on these plays. But only a little, because it made good money last year and has a longer history than one year.
I'd like to go back and see how many of these are won in the first half and how many are pulled back in the second. If most years are like last year, where the second half was a better bet than the first (I think somebody said there were 11 first-half winners, meaning there were 26 second-half winners, or am I wrong about that?), the obvious question is why play the first half at all? Just wait for the second-half line (generally half of the first-half total) and hammer the under in a game that has produced way more points than expected to that point.
I remember there was a similar NBA play that played on 1Q dog, double-bet 2Q or game on the fave? The idea was that the fave took things a little easy until they realized they had to actually compete, then whupped the dog thereafter.
Personally, the reason I don’t get involved in these double-or-nothing systems is I can’t take having 3 units up to win 1, which is the way it works a lot of the time. I think I’d just focus on second-half lines for that reason.
Just my two cents. I hope you guys make some serious cash this season. Ignore the haters.
Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page?
I think mine was the last post, and I can't see anything either. Amazingly I just found my post in drafts (I was having all sorts of problems with the website), so I'll post it again.
Quote:
Hey guys. I don't have a dog in this hunt, except that I lost a unit on my own in the BSU-Ore first half. The worst bad beat among what looks to have been many today.
Anyway, I'm here having read the ridiculous crap that Roggs has to put up with for just sharing his picks, and I have a few observations. One is that the 37-3 is misleading because of how many units are won and lost on these plays. But only a little, because it made good money last year and has a longer history than one year.
I'd like to go back and see how many of these are won in the first half and how many are pulled back in the second. If most years are like last year, where the second half was a better bet than the first (I think somebody said there were 11 first-half winners, meaning there were 26 second-half winners, or am I wrong about that?), the obvious question is why play the first half at all? Just wait for the second-half line (generally half of the first-half total) and hammer the under in a game that has produced way more points than expected to that point.
I remember there was a similar NBA play that played on 1Q dog, double-bet 2Q or game on the fave? The idea was that the fave took things a little easy until they realized they had to actually compete, then whupped the dog thereafter.
Personally, the reason I don’t get involved in these double-or-nothing systems is I can’t take having 3 units up to win 1, which is the way it works a lot of the time. I think I’d just focus on second-half lines for that reason.
Just my two cents. I hope you guys make some serious cash this season. Ignore the haters.
I think mine was the last post, and I can't see anything either. Amazingly I just found my post in drafts (I was having all sorts of problems with the website), so I'll post it again.
Quote:
Hey guys. I don't have a dog in this hunt, except that I lost a unit on my own in the BSU-Ore first half. The worst bad beat among what looks to have been many today.
Anyway, I'm here having read the ridiculous crap that Roggs has to put up with for just sharing his picks, and I have a few observations. One is that the 37-3 is misleading because of how many units are won and lost on these plays. But only a little, because it made good money last year and has a longer history than one year.
I'd like to go back and see how many of these are won in the first half and how many are pulled back in the second. If most years are like last year, where the second half was a better bet than the first (I think somebody said there were 11 first-half winners, meaning there were 26 second-half winners, or am I wrong about that?), the obvious question is why play the first half at all? Just wait for the second-half line (generally half of the first-half total) and hammer the under in a game that has produced way more points than expected to that point.
I remember there was a similar NBA play that played on 1Q dog, double-bet 2Q or game on the fave? The idea was that the fave took things a little easy until they realized they had to actually compete, then whupped the dog thereafter.
Personally, the reason I don’t get involved in these double-or-nothing systems is I can’t take having 3 units up to win 1, which is the way it works a lot of the time. I think I’d just focus on second-half lines for that reason.
Just my two cents. I hope you guys make some serious cash this season. Ignore the haters.
I think mine was the last post, and I can't see anything either. Amazingly I just found my post in drafts (I was having all sorts of problems with the website), so I'll post it again.
Quote:
Hey guys. I don't have a dog in this hunt, except that I lost a unit on my own in the BSU-Ore first half. The worst bad beat among what looks to have been many today.
Anyway, I'm here having read the ridiculous crap that Roggs has to put up with for just sharing his picks, and I have a few observations. One is that the 37-3 is misleading because of how many units are won and lost on these plays. But only a little, because it made good money last year and has a longer history than one year.
I'd like to go back and see how many of these are won in the first half and how many are pulled back in the second. If most years are like last year, where the second half was a better bet than the first (I think somebody said there were 11 first-half winners, meaning there were 26 second-half winners, or am I wrong about that?), the obvious question is why play the first half at all? Just wait for the second-half line (generally half of the first-half total) and hammer the under in a game that has produced way more points than expected to that point.
I remember there was a similar NBA play that played on 1Q dog, double-bet 2Q or game on the fave? The idea was that the fave took things a little easy until they realized they had to actually compete, then whupped the dog thereafter.
Personally, the reason I don’t get involved in these double-or-nothing systems is I can’t take having 3 units up to win 1, which is the way it works a lot of the time. I think I’d just focus on second-half lines for that reason.
Just my two cents. I hope you guys make some serious cash this season. Ignore the haters.
As far as tonights game - I see no point of locking this in before after dinner east coast time... let the points keep rising... In saying that its a pure guessing game... I did not guess right in mtsu :0
As far as tonights game - I see no point of locking this in before after dinner east coast time... let the points keep rising... In saying that its a pure guessing game... I did not guess right in mtsu :0
Roggs, Not sure if this happened last year but if somehow 1st half is a push , is there a 2nd half play for 1 or 2 units ? Or are we just moving onto the next game
Roggs, Not sure if this happened last year but if somehow 1st half is a push , is there a 2nd half play for 1 or 2 units ? Or are we just moving onto the next game
One thing I just noticed is it looks like sometime this weekend covers changed its formats of the forums... It might have cut off a bunch of posts... Anyways slow start we in this for long haul...
One thing I just noticed is it looks like sometime this weekend covers changed its formats of the forums... It might have cut off a bunch of posts... Anyways slow start we in this for long haul...
SWEET!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for clearing that up Roggs. This is both FUN and Profitable.
The Hobbits most likely blew half their BR tring to get rich the first day.
This upset them.
Now they have retreated to the Shire, or to a Trolls cave, or wherever they go to whine.
We can now enjoy this thread and system.
It's what BOWL season is all about.![]()
SWEET!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for clearing that up Roggs. This is both FUN and Profitable.
The Hobbits most likely blew half their BR tring to get rich the first day.
This upset them.
Now they have retreated to the Shire, or to a Trolls cave, or wherever they go to whine.
We can now enjoy this thread and system.
It's what BOWL season is all about.![]()
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,070
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,813
-
Thursday 09/10/2026
925
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,460
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,448
-
9/10 Fast Cash Five 💰??🔥
3,824
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,232
-
PART TROIS
283
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,832
-
Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity
26,155
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
