6 - 6 on the day and exactly EVEN....but I feel beat up haha...with topsy turvy second halves but I guess that is part of the thrill?
This game will define my day > . Gonzaga -2 x 1U
Hey Felix, I was on a walk with my wife watching the score of Lou Tech and thinking I had a good shot on that one going UNDER but meh....and the UNC Wilm cover is a surprise because they were only up by 5 with 3 minutes left when I left
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
1
6 - 6 on the day and exactly EVEN....but I feel beat up haha...with topsy turvy second halves but I guess that is part of the thrill?
This game will define my day > . Gonzaga -2 x 1U
Hey Felix, I was on a walk with my wife watching the score of Lou Tech and thinking I had a good shot on that one going UNDER but meh....and the UNC Wilm cover is a surprise because they were only up by 5 with 3 minutes left when I left
6 - 6 on the day and exactly EVEN....but I feel beat up haha...with topsy turvy second halves but I guess that is part of the thrill? This game will define my day > . Gonzaga -2 x 1U Hey Felix, I was on a walk with my wife watching the score of Lou Tech and thinking I had a good shot on that one going UNDER but meh....and the UNC Wilm cover is a surprise because they were only up by 5 with 3 minutes left when I left
Yeah i thought we were gonna cash both…
Take a split on those I suppose
Your efforts and insight are truly appreciated!!
1
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
6 - 6 on the day and exactly EVEN....but I feel beat up haha...with topsy turvy second halves but I guess that is part of the thrill? This game will define my day > . Gonzaga -2 x 1U Hey Felix, I was on a walk with my wife watching the score of Lou Tech and thinking I had a good shot on that one going UNDER but meh....and the UNC Wilm cover is a surprise because they were only up by 5 with 3 minutes left when I left
Oregon - Creighton > lean Creighton due to SOS at 18th vs Oregon 55th strength of schedule - Creighton has Oregon by 2.5 pts in point differential - this should be a tight game Play #2 - Creighton Under 152.5 x HALF U I can see a score of 76 - 73 in this one
I just bought out this play for the reason that I lost my Lou Tech-Indiana St UNDER play yesterday..... I said that game would be tight and it was....BUT resulting in many fouls in the last few minutes pumping up the score by easily 5- 10 pts, so that may happen in this one.... I am going to have to remember that angle when I see an anticipated tight game and playing a total
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
Oregon - Creighton > lean Creighton due to SOS at 18th vs Oregon 55th strength of schedule - Creighton has Oregon by 2.5 pts in point differential - this should be a tight game Play #2 - Creighton Under 152.5 x HALF U I can see a score of 76 - 73 in this one
I just bought out this play for the reason that I lost my Lou Tech-Indiana St UNDER play yesterday..... I said that game would be tight and it was....BUT resulting in many fouls in the last few minutes pumping up the score by easily 5- 10 pts, so that may happen in this one.... I am going to have to remember that angle when I see an anticipated tight game and playing a total
-both teams score over 80 pts easily against most opponents and they can play defense but this should be within 7 pts the whole way and I can see one team trying to foul to stay close, as well as some 3 pt shots being thrown up much more in the second half
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Over St Mary's VTECH 142.5 x HALF U
-both teams score over 80 pts easily against most opponents and they can play defense but this should be within 7 pts the whole way and I can see one team trying to foul to stay close, as well as some 3 pt shots being thrown up much more in the second half
....I am watching the Total as well....I think since its in California, Stanford will have the crowd and they can score as an offense and should get 75-80 pts.... Minny is the x-factor
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Late Play I like:
Stanford -2 x HALF U
....I am watching the Total as well....I think since its in California, Stanford will have the crowd and they can score as an offense and should get 75-80 pts.... Minny is the x-factor
-two teams that don't score much but give up points....I got a feeling that will cancel each other out and they might score 65-70 each but not much more
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Just 1 Play to start:
Under SE Louisiana 142 x 1.5 U
-two teams that don't score much but give up points....I got a feeling that will cancel each other out and they might score 65-70 each but not much more
I am capping well but strange shit is happening on some plays like looking great in first HALF...cruising with only 60 pts score, then....atypical stuff happening second half so it tells me to put the brakes on for a bit so I will ( I had KENTUCKY Under likely with 3 minutes left and 18 pts under the total a few days ago and they decided to jack up 3 pters every 5 seconds they had the ball and it went over by a half pt....very unlucky) ...gonna just work on capping charts for a bit and will post something in here when I just take a breather for 4, 24 or 48 hrs...I will know
We were home and cooled possible with 40 seconds to go when the score was at 134 and then Gardiner hit that 3 pt shot which allowed them to continue to four and have a chance....they miss and likely SE Lou kills clock to end the game or just turn it over with 15 seconds left and up by 10 pts....but nope, thats gambling
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
I am capping well but strange shit is happening on some plays like looking great in first HALF...cruising with only 60 pts score, then....atypical stuff happening second half so it tells me to put the brakes on for a bit so I will ( I had KENTUCKY Under likely with 3 minutes left and 18 pts under the total a few days ago and they decided to jack up 3 pters every 5 seconds they had the ball and it went over by a half pt....very unlucky) ...gonna just work on capping charts for a bit and will post something in here when I just take a breather for 4, 24 or 48 hrs...I will know
We were home and cooled possible with 40 seconds to go when the score was at 134 and then Gardiner hit that 3 pt shot which allowed them to continue to four and have a chance....they miss and likely SE Lou kills clock to end the game or just turn it over with 15 seconds left and up by 10 pts....but nope, thats gambling
-positive correlation both in rank comparison and line
-great defense by UCIRv
-both teams have similar strength of schedule
-both teams score around 66 pts but UCIRV's defense is 10 pts better
-100+ ranks separate them
>>> if you think it will be tight, consider them moneyline instead with another team and do some parlays and take SJST winning margin to win by +1-2 pts maybe as a hedge and it should pay +700 likely
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Late Play of the Day I checked out:
UC Irvine -2 x 1U
-positive correlation both in rank comparison and line
-great defense by UCIRv
-both teams have similar strength of schedule
-both teams score around 66 pts but UCIRV's defense is 10 pts better
-100+ ranks separate them
>>> if you think it will be tight, consider them moneyline instead with another team and do some parlays and take SJST winning margin to win by +1-2 pts maybe as a hedge and it should pay +700 likely
- impressive point differential and only allowing 66 pts per game and they score more than Charleston who give up more points than they score, but a SOS that has been tougher by over 100 rank positions
- I like the UNDER here as well but their could be OT in this one
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Play #2 Belmont -3 x HALF U
- impressive point differential and only allowing 66 pts per game and they score more than Charleston who give up more points than they score, but a SOS that has been tougher by over 100 rank positions
- I like the UNDER here as well but their could be OT in this one
2 - 0 Today +1.5 U >> still working on my chart which when completed, it will save me and find me great situations since it will be organized in a way to spend less time sifting
I will have to update it once every 10-14 days but it will be beneficial to do so as I see some big swings changing their numbers
I do not want a lot of games and so many choices and miss the best ones...I had 2 monster days a week ago or so because I had a large amount of time and was fresh to put in the comparisons...now things are gonna get harder for me for about 3 weeks but after we will be in Conference play and that is when you want to be ready for sure!!
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
2 - 0 Today +1.5 U >> still working on my chart which when completed, it will save me and find me great situations since it will be organized in a way to spend less time sifting
I will have to update it once every 10-14 days but it will be beneficial to do so as I see some big swings changing their numbers
I do not want a lot of games and so many choices and miss the best ones...I had 2 monster days a week ago or so because I had a large amount of time and was fresh to put in the comparisons...now things are gonna get harder for me for about 3 weeks but after we will be in Conference play and that is when you want to be ready for sure!!
- Villanova scores over 80 pts/ Temple scores 79 per game..... Villa with the stronger defense and SOS so I expect the 66 that they allow to come up to at least 68-72 pts....I have seen Temple come back from being down 10-15 pts with the 3pt and they are very much an uptempo scoring team if you look at other games they play
- Expect Villa to score over 80 pts and Temple to get the minimum of 66-68 and that should be more than enough to cover
- I predict an 85-71 score as their past matches show over 150 a year when the makeup of the teams allow it and these two teams are poor defending the 3pt and give up buckets easily at times
I have one more play that I might smash if I see the right stats....everything else lines up with the matchup
When I get my SOS correlated with pts FOR and pts AGAINST along with rank correlations, I am going to have the advantage in the evening for the next day.....but it takes time to get it right and I need data so probably will be down around the middle or 8th-10th of December and we can start snapping at these night lines because, by the morning, many totals and sides are 3-5 pts changed on good ones
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Monday:
Play #1 - Temple-Villanova Over 149.5 x 2U
- Villanova scores over 80 pts/ Temple scores 79 per game..... Villa with the stronger defense and SOS so I expect the 66 that they allow to come up to at least 68-72 pts....I have seen Temple come back from being down 10-15 pts with the 3pt and they are very much an uptempo scoring team if you look at other games they play
- Expect Villa to score over 80 pts and Temple to get the minimum of 66-68 and that should be more than enough to cover
- I predict an 85-71 score as their past matches show over 150 a year when the makeup of the teams allow it and these two teams are poor defending the 3pt and give up buckets easily at times
I have one more play that I might smash if I see the right stats....everything else lines up with the matchup
When I get my SOS correlated with pts FOR and pts AGAINST along with rank correlations, I am going to have the advantage in the evening for the next day.....but it takes time to get it right and I need data so probably will be down around the middle or 8th-10th of December and we can start snapping at these night lines because, by the morning, many totals and sides are 3-5 pts changed on good ones
Parlay > UAB ML 1.62 x McNesse ML 1.31 = pays +112 x 3U ( $240)
-I see more value in the parlay being a road team
- could they get into a back door cover.....with home crowd, refs etc....YES...but I will risk 1U on the -3.5, but I don't see UAB losing for this reason
- UAB scores over 82 pts per game and their SOS is 137th ....their defense is 10pts lower than they score which is amazing and what you look for with a favorite
- MTSU though....scores less pts than UAB and gives up over 81pts per game with just a slightly stronger SOS of 100th
McNeese makes a good parlay partner because of their Pts for and against vs Incarnate > 90th SOS and 6 - 1 (4-1 ATS) with 9 pts more than they allow .....while Incarnate allow 11 pts more than they score which is less than what McNeese scores.....big difference in ranking as well
I like these two plays a lot and will not likely dilute my results and just focus on making some money here and the Villa game (HOPEFULLY)
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
1
Play #2 - UAB -3.5 x 1U
Parlay > UAB ML 1.62 x McNesse ML 1.31 = pays +112 x 3U ( $240)
-I see more value in the parlay being a road team
- could they get into a back door cover.....with home crowd, refs etc....YES...but I will risk 1U on the -3.5, but I don't see UAB losing for this reason
- UAB scores over 82 pts per game and their SOS is 137th ....their defense is 10pts lower than they score which is amazing and what you look for with a favorite
- MTSU though....scores less pts than UAB and gives up over 81pts per game with just a slightly stronger SOS of 100th
McNeese makes a good parlay partner because of their Pts for and against vs Incarnate > 90th SOS and 6 - 1 (4-1 ATS) with 9 pts more than they allow .....while Incarnate allow 11 pts more than they score which is less than what McNeese scores.....big difference in ranking as well
I like these two plays a lot and will not likely dilute my results and just focus on making some money here and the Villa game (HOPEFULLY)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.