Posted:
#51
Happy Days are here again
Good morning everybody!!! Today we singing Sunny Days are here again!! Sunny days are here again!! Very heavy sharp move on this play tonight!!!
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by Aproberto:
Tailed straightbets again last week and he must have had a bad week because I only won $2200, week before was almost $5K, week before that was also about $5K. Any of the straightbets hating crowd that thinks $12k in 3 weeks for a nickel bettor is anything but great , needs to gather themself. Please keep doing exactly what you have been doing for me for the last month and a half.
Tailed straightbets again last week and he must have had a bad week because I only won $2200, week before was almost $5K, week before that was also about $5K. Any of the straightbets hating crowd that thinks $12k in 3 weeks for a nickel bettor is anything but great , needs to gather themself. Please keep doing exactly what you have been doing for me for the last month and a half.
Lol.. why post that isnt even noteworthy to a penny better lmfao .. if he wins 80 to 90 percent of the time like he claims why isn't it more
Posted:
#56
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.
Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.
When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.
Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.
Thanks.
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
The record claims go both ways. You have countless trolls coming into the three and saying any game SB talks about is a play and claiming it’s a loss. Discussion for 8 hours before a game isn’t a play. I think it would solve a lot of problems to just suspend/ban anyone making personal attacks in the thread.
Posted:
#61
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
what would be the accountable way of record keeping?
And so you know. I’m not the one who cares about records. The people who tail my plays don’t care either. They all been making money. It’s only the jealous in here that care
but nevertheless please tell me what would be the accountable way of record keeping
Posted:
#62
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins. So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate. Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins. And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses. I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is.
you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss. And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win. They do not carry the same weight!!!
Posted:
#65
Quote Originally Posted by Gatorhater_27:
Personally, I don’t think you should have to keep a record...your true followers know how you are doing. 3/4 of the cappers on here don’t keep records anyway. Just post your picks...people can either follow you or not. Plain and simple.
Personally, I don’t think you should have to keep a record...your true followers know how you are doing. 3/4 of the cappers on here don’t keep records anyway. Just post your picks...people can either follow you or not. Plain and simple.
I agree really
Posted:
#66
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Quote Originally Posted by Gatorhater_27:
This guy takes more abuse then Trump
lol. Cause I win and make everyone money and so the jealous cowards here can’t fathom it. LolThis guy takes more abuse then Trump
im not complaining! I have watched and followed your picks for a few weeks now. I have made some good money tailing you. Some people just need to relax and let you do what you do, stop being greedy and expecting so much from you. Just keep doing what you have been doing and ignore the haters! I appreciate what you have done for us SB..learned some new angles to look at when capping and other things you have told us to look for along the way, it’s been very profitable! Some people have to realize this is a marathon and not a sprint! Always getting greedy and wanting it all at once from ya!
Posted:
#67
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
Sounds like a great solution DJBrow Thanks!
Have a great day! 
Posted:
#72
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins. So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate. Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins. And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses. I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is. you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss. And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win. They do not carry the same weight!!! Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
Personally dont matter to me, as I enjoy our back and forths, whether good or bad lol..I do respect your picks and knowledge,again I dont care......but as far as record keeping in these forums, since eternity...1 game equals 1 win or loss, reguardless.....thats when units come into play..example, a dog winner at +240...and 2 regular losers ats (-110)....that would be 1-2 +.2units (+2.4 -1.1,-1.1)...........2 dog winners +150 each would be 2-0 +3 units.......a -200 ML favorite loser would be 0-1 -2u etc... Either way, GL
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by jimbof20:
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Personally dont matter to me, as I enjoy our back and forths, whether good or bad lol..I do respect your picks and knowledge,again I dont care......but as far as record keeping in these forums, since eternity...1 game equals 1 win or loss, reguardless.....thats when units come into play..example, a dog winner at +240...and 2 regular losers ats (-110)....that would be 1-2 +.2units (+2.4 -1.1,-1.1)...........2 dog winners +150 each would be 2-0 +3 units.......a -200 ML favorite loser would be 0-1 -2u etc... Either way, GL Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins. So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate. Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins. And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses. I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is. you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss. And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win. They do not carry the same weight!!! Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
any back and forth we had I feel for the most part was done with respect. There may have been one comment made by each of us to the other which crossed the line of respect and for my part I do appologize. But overall there is nothing wrong with disagreeing with someone’s pick or someone’s betting strategy.
but to be jealous because I get views and they don’t. That’s their problem not mine
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by jimbof20:
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Personally dont matter to me, as I enjoy our back and forths, whether good or bad lol..I do respect your picks and knowledge,again I dont care......but as far as record keeping in these forums, since eternity...1 game equals 1 win or loss, reguardless.....thats when units come into play..example, a dog winner at +240...and 2 regular losers ats (-110)....that would be 1-2 +.2units (+2.4 -1.1,-1.1)...........2 dog winners +150 each would be 2-0 +3 units.......a -200 ML favorite loser would be 0-1 -2u etc... Either way, GL Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins. So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate. Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins. And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses. I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is. you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss. And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win. They do not carry the same weight!!! Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. Thanks. Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:
I can tell him the last two days results. 21-10 up 150 units Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.do you have yesterday's results?
but you can’t count it that way brother. Units is a joke. Because I can post 150 units on things and it means ZERO. And I was doing it to make fun of mr loot train and his 40 units. What’s 40 units???
the only way you can count it and be accurate is the way I count them. Ml dogs count as they are. A plus 200 equals 2 wins. A plus 300 equals 3 wins. A plus 400 equals 4 wins
a minus 200 loss equals 2 losses. A minus 300 loss is 3 losses. Now if you go and say 40 units on a -240 and that loses that’s 85 losses anyway you want to cut it. It’s 85 loses brother. And everyone with half a brain understands this!!!
Hot Forum Topics
