Memphis vs Tulane Picks & Props
MEM vs TULN Picks
NCAAF Picks
1st Half u27.5 (-103)
First-half Under 27.5 is playable down to 26.5. This is mainly a combo leg that boosts the payout, but both teams score more in the second half and Memphis leads the country in red-zone touchdown rate allowed.
o55.5 (-111)
Over 55.5 is playable up to 56.5. Both offenses play fast and create explosive plays, while AAC-leading passer Marcus Stokes faces a Tulane defense that struggles to generate pressure and grades near the bottom nationally against the pass.
TULN +6.5 (+105)
Tulane +6.5 is playable down to +5.5. Memphis struggles to stop the run and limit explosive plays, giving the Green Wave multiple ways to stay ahead of schedule and keep this conference matchup inside the number.
MEM -6.5 (-120)
The Memphis rushing attack against Tulane's defense is the matchup that will lead the Tigers to victory. The Tigers rank seventh in the nation in both yards per carry and rushing yards per game, while Tulane is 112th in opponent yards per carry and 129th (out of 138!) in rushing yards allowed per game. Memphis also leads the nation in yards per attempt and is second in yards per play overall. Whatever way you slice it, Tulane won't be able to stop the Tigers.
I’m expecting a slower start before the game opens up after halftime. If Tulane stays within striking distance throughout, Memphis should remain aggressive offensively instead of bleeding clock, creating a script where all three positions can work together.
MEM vs TULN Consensus Picks
MEM vs TULN Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PASSING YARDS
TULN
K. Semonza
(QB)
o174.5 Passing Yards
224.14 OVER
PROJECTION
+49.6
DIFFERENCE
27.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING YARDS
MEM
J. Carter
(RB)
o89.5 Rushing Yards
102.46 OVER
PROJECTION
+13.0
DIFFERENCE
26.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RUSHING YARDS
MEM
M. Stokes
(QB)
u29.5 Rushing Yards
28.00 UNDER
PROJECTION
-1.5
DIFFERENCE
9.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
TULN
A. Brown-Stephens
(WR)
o29.5 Receiving Yards
44.48 OVER
PROJECTION
+15.0
DIFFERENCE
27.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
TULN
D. Hill
(WR)
o41.5 Receiving Yards
60.56 OVER
PROJECTION
+19.1
DIFFERENCE
26.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
MEM
T. Chapman
(WR)
o29.5 Receiving Yards
39.59 OVER
PROJECTION
+10.1
DIFFERENCE
26.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
MEM
J. Hayes
(WR)
o39.5 Receiving Yards
47.66 OVER
PROJECTION
+8.2
DIFFERENCE
24.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
MEM
M. Covey
(RB)
o3.5 Receiving Yards
6.77 OVER
PROJECTION
+3.3
DIFFERENCE
22.1%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEIVING YARDS
MEM
H. Tipton
(TE)
u33.5 Receiving Yards
32.21 UNDER
PROJECTION
-1.3
DIFFERENCE
10.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
RECEPTIONS
TULN
D. Hill
(WR)
o3.5 Receptions
4.14 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
17.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
CARRIES
TULN
K. Semonza
(QB)
o5.5 Carries
6.34 OVER
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
14.64%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
Recent Form Trends
Under is 6-0 in Green Wave last 6 games following a ATS win.
Under is 4-0 in Green Wave last 4 home games vs. a team with a winning road record.
Under is 4-0 in Green Wave last 4 games after accumulating less than 170 yards passing in their previous game.
Over is 4-0 in Green Wave last 4 games after accumulating more than 200 yards rushing in their previous game.
Under is 6-1 in Green Wave last 7 home games.
Tigers are 6-1 ATS in their last 7 games as a road favorite.
Tigers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games in October.
Over is 5-1 in Tigers last 6 road games vs. a team with a losing home record.
ROI Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for each team.