Chicago White Sox Picks
1st in American League Central
(53 - 46)
Next Game
Tue, Jul 21
20:05 ET
CHW @ TEX Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Munetaka Murakami in the 6th percentile when assessing his batting average skill.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Globe Life Field as the 2nd-worst park in the game for lefty batting average.. The Globe Life Field roof figures to be closed today, making the temperature in this match-up -11° colder than the average outdoor game on the slate today — favorable for pitching.. Munetaka Murakami hits many of his flyballs to center field (38.7% — 88th percentile) and has the misfortune of hitting them towards the league's 6th-deepest CF fences in today's game.. Munetaka Murakami will be at a disadvantage playing on the road in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The #2 stadium in the game for suppressing batting average to right-handed batters, per the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Globe Life Field.. The Globe Life Field roof figures to be closed today, making the temperature in this match-up -11° colder than the average outdoor game on the slate today — favorable for pitching.. Josh Jung hits a lot of his flyballs to center field (39.9% — 98th percentile) and will be challenged by the game's 6th-deepest CF fences in today's matchup.. The leading projection system (THE BAT X) estimates Josh Jung's true offensive ability to be a .328, indicating that he has been very fortunate this year given the .021 disparity between that mark and his actual .349 wOBA.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Miguel Vargas in the 97th percentile when estimating his overall offensive talent.. Miguel Vargas is penciled in 3rd on the lineup card in today's game.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Miguel Vargas's ability to hit the ball at a HR-optimizing launch angle (between 23° and 34°) has gotten better from last year to this one, going from 17.3% to 22%.. Miguel Vargas has exhibited good plate discipline this year, ranking in the 94th percentile with a 1.31 K/BB rate.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When estimating his overall offensive talent, Andrew Benintendi ranks in the 75th percentile according to the leading projections (THE BAT X).. Andrew Benintendi is projected to hit 5th on the lineup card in today's game.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Andrew Benintendi will hold the platoon advantage over Kumar Rocker in today's matchup... and moreover, Rocker has a large platoon split.. Sporting a 30.500 Expected Home Runs per 600 plate appearances (an advanced metric created by the leading projection system (THE BAT X) based on Statcast data) since the start of last season , Andrew Benintendi has performed in the 90th percentile for power.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Globe Life Field as the worst field in the game for run-scoring.. The 6th-deepest CF dimensions in the majors are found in Globe Life Field.. The Globe Life Field roof figures to be closed today, making the temperature in this match-up -11° colder than the average outdoor game on the slate today — favorable for pitching.. Colson Montgomery will be at a disadvantage playing on the road in today's game.. In the past two weeks, Colson Montgomery's Barrel% has experienced a negative regression, plummeting from his seasonal rate of 13.5% down to 0%.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
As it relates to his overall offensive talent, Wyatt Langford ranks in the 96th percentile according to the leading projections (THE BAT X).. Wyatt Langford is projected to hit 2nd in the lineup today.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Wyatt Langford will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Noah Schultz in today's game... and even better, Schultz has a large platoon split.. Wyatt Langford will hold the home field advantage in today's matchup, which should improve all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Jake Burger in the 94th percentile when it comes to his home run skill.. Jake Burger is penciled in 5th in the batting order today.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Given Noah Schultz's large platoon split, Jake Burger will have a gigantic advantage hitting from the opposite side of the plate in today's matchup.. Jake Burger will have the benefit of the home field advantage in today's matchup, which should improve all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) ranks Munetaka Murakami as the game's 3rd-best home run hitter.. Munetaka Murakami is projected to hit 2nd in the batting order today.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Munetaka Murakami will hold the platoon advantage over Kumar Rocker today... and moreover, Rocker has a large platoon split.. Checking in at the 96th percentile, Munetaka Murakami has notched a .379 wOBA (widely regarded as the top measure of overall offense) this year.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Samuel Antonacci's batting average talent is projected to be in the 96th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Samuel Antonacci is penciled in 1st in the lineup in this matchup.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Because of Kumar Rocker's large platoon split, Samuel Antonacci will have a tremendous advantage hitting from the opposite side of the dish in this game.. Over the last week, Samuel Antonacci's exit velocity on flyballs has seen a big rise, from 91.3-mph over the course of the season to 102.4-mph lately.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) ranks Colson Montgomery as the league's 16th-best home run hitter.. Colson Montgomery is projected to bat 4th in the batting order in this game.. Globe Life Field has the 6th-lowest average fence height in the majors.. Colson Montgomery will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Kumar Rocker in today's matchup... and the cherry on top, Rocker has a large platoon split.. Colson Montgomery's launch angle this season (23.1°) is quite a bit better than his 18° figure last season.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusCHW @ TEX · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Jung
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
8.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Foscue
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
6.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
W. Langford
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
6.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Duran
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Lopez
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.32%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Burger
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.32%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-7.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.8%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.89
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.85%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
W. Langford
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Burger
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
10.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. Duran
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.83
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Jung
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Nimmo
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
1.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Foscue
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Higashioka
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Lopez
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.84
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-3.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
22.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Burger
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Duran
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Jung
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Higashioka
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
N. Schultz
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
K. Rocker
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
21.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.70
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
W. Langford
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.97%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Jung
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Higashioka
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.77%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Burger
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Foscue
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Duran
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Lopez
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-4.97%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.27
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
14.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
13.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.26
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
13.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
8.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Burger
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Higashioka
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
2.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
1.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Lopez
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Foscue
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-1.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-2.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Duran
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-4.55%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.5%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Jung
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
8.22%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Foscue
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.79
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
6.94%
EV
TOTAL HITS
W. Langford
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
6.31%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.72%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.5%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.37%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. Duran
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.95%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.94%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Lopez
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.32%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.24%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Burger
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.32%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.34%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.10
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-7.82%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
12.8%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.16%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.89
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.85%
EV
TOTAL BASES
W. Langford
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.53%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Burger
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
10.19%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.64%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.49%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. Duran
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.83
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.7%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Jung
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.2%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Nimmo
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.16%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
1.4%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Foscue
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.06%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Higashioka
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.99%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Lopez
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.84
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-3.69%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.21%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
22.78%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.26%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Burger
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.26%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.88%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.82%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Duran
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.2%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Jung
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.46%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.49%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.5%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Higashioka
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.88%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
N. Schultz
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
3.99%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
K. Rocker
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.34%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
21.49%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.70
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.9%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
W. Langford
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
10.97%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Jung
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.73%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Higashioka
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.77%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Burger
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.53%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.21%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Foscue
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.52%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.26%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Duran
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.66%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Lopez
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.59%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-4.97%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.27
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
14.26%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
13.36%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.26
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
13.05%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.16
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
8.7%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Burger
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.03%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Higashioka
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
2.36%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Nimmo
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
1.65%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Lopez
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.64%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Foscue
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-1.33%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-2.89%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Duran
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-4.55%
EV