St. Louis vs Athletics Picks & Props
STL vs ATH Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his home run skill, Nolan Gorman ranks in the 94th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Nolan Gorman is penciled in 5th in the batting order in this matchup.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his overall offensive ability, JJ Wetherholt ranks in the 85th percentile according to the leading projections (THE BAT X).. JJ Wetherholt is penciled in 1st on the lineup card in this matchup.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. The wind projects to be blowing out to RF at 14.7-mph in this contest, the 4th-best of the day for hitters.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his home run ability, Jordan Walker ranks in the 94th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Jordan Walker is projected to hit 4th in the lineup today.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Alec Burleson in the 93rd percentile when estimating his batting average ability.. Alec Burleson is projected to bat 3rd in the lineup today.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Ivan Herrera in the 95th percentile when estimating his overall offensive ability.. Ivan Herrera is penciled in 2nd in the batting order in today's game.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Nathan Church in the 76th percentile when estimating his batting average talent.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).. The wind projects to be blowing out to RF at 14.7-mph in this contest, the 4th-best of the day for hitters.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
As it relates to his home run skill, Nolan Gorman ranks in the 94th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Nolan Gorman is penciled in 5th in the batting order in this matchup.. Sutter Health Park grades out as the #6 park in baseball for LHB home runs, per the leading projection system (THE BAT).. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his home run skill, Nolan Gorman ranks in the 94th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Nolan Gorman is penciled in 5th in the batting order in this matchup.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his overall offensive ability, JJ Wetherholt ranks in the 85th percentile according to the leading projections (THE BAT X).. JJ Wetherholt is penciled in 1st on the lineup card in this matchup.. The #2 ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats, via the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Sutter Health Park.. In the league, Sutter Health Park has the 4th-lowest average fence height.. The weather forecast expects temperatures in this contest to reach the highest level on the schedule today at 90°, which is highly linked to an increase in offense (and a reduction in strikeouts).
STL vs ATH Consensus Picks
STL vs ATH Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
Over
9.5 Total
11.11
PROJECTION
+1.6
DIFFERENCE
12.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
P. Pages
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
I. Herrera
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.11
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.15
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-5.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Church
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.21
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-7.92%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
18.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
17.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Winn
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Walker
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Burleson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.17
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
13.67%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
I. Herrera
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Church
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
P. Pages
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
6.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
I. Herrera
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
5.28%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.23
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Church
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.09%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
P. Pages
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
J. Ginn
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
M. Liberatore
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
16.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
I. Herrera
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
P. Pages
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Church
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.77%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.34
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
17.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Burleson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.76
PROJECTION
+1.3
DIFFERENCE
13.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.53
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
12.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Walker
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.46
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
11.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Winn
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
I. Herrera
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.37
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
9.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Church
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
P. Pages
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.31%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
Over
9.5 Total
11.11
PROJECTION
+1.6
DIFFERENCE
12.89%
EV
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
P. Pages
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-2.6%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.46%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.36%
EV
TOTAL HITS
I. Herrera
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
1.11
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.42%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-4.73%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.15
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-5.55%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Church
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.9%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.21
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
-7.92%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
18.59%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
17.03%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Winn
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
13.9%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Walker
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.69%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Burleson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
2.17
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
13.67%
EV
TOTAL BASES
I. Herrera
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.49%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Church
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.27%
EV
TOTAL BASES
P. Pages
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.54%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
10.22%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
6.84%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
I. Herrera
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
5.28%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.88%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.23
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.2%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.96%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Church
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.09%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
P. Pages
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.54%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
J. Ginn
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.9%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
M. Liberatore
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.25%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
16.36%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.45%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
14.35%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
14.31%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
I. Herrera
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.07%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
P. Pages
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.99%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Church
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.49%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.77%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.34
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
17.18%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Burleson
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.76
PROJECTION
+1.3
DIFFERENCE
13.46%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Wetherholt
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.53
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
12.73%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Walker
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.46
PROJECTION
+1.0
DIFFERENCE
11.69%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Winn
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.35%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
I. Herrera
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.37
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
9.19%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Church
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.47%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
P. Pages
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.31%
EV
STL vs ATH Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for this matchup