I gave you leans based on Home/Away Trends and Greater/Less Ranked teams as we have been doing in this tread (well I have.. everyone else is taking differentials into consideration to determine what games they will look at more closely to put money on.
Waiting til game 3 you would miss out on some of the 80% trend and I am trying to figure out now how we can not miss out on that but I have been busy moving.
0
I am using game 1 and 2 to predict game 3...
I gave you leans based on Home/Away Trends and Greater/Less Ranked teams as we have been doing in this tread (well I have.. everyone else is taking differentials into consideration to determine what games they will look at more closely to put money on.
Waiting til game 3 you would miss out on some of the 80% trend and I am trying to figure out now how we can not miss out on that but I have been busy moving.
I know we've already played TOR 3 times recently, but getting +140 on a team who's the 2nd-best PR road team & falls into a 79% trend going against a pitcher who's been downright horrible since 2008 seems like it's as good a bet as we can ask for. Almost every ML we've seen so far has been minus money - a lot have been heavy chalk. I'm trusting the system, a trend and a terrible pitcher here.
I also booked the STL RL.
Good luck everyone!!
hey there sixten, first off i wanted to say you and everyone contributing to this thread are doing an AWESOME job and i definitely trust what you guys are doing..i really think you got something going on that is really good and i want to thank you for sharing this with all of us here at covers...i know nabil started this thread but he has been MIA for a bit.... i usually dont post cuz i dont want to clog up the thread but today i think i wanted to drop my 2 cents.... this is more of a question than a statement but did toronto really fit the system today? i tailed bllindly today since i had school and golf to take care of and noticed that it seems like TODAY you guys kinda didnt follow the system and went with a FADE, a dice-k fade...if im not mistaking the PR showed that TB and STL were the top plays....i dont study the PR as much as you guys but it seems like you just kinda of talked yourself into making TOR your POd...if im wrong im sorry but it seems like the +5 or more PR teams which were tb and st. louis today and even with a lot of juice they should of been the POD IMO.... i guess what im getting at is i would really appreciate if you guys sticked to the system than a DICE-K fade or fade anyone play...i trail blindly a lot because i know you guys do your hw and your record speaks for itself...obviously i should of read the whole thread but i know if i was home in front of a computer i would of just bet the cards and tb instead of cards and tor.... i hope i didnt offend you cuz that is not my intension at all, you do a great job and i hope u keep posting your pods...i enjoy this thread and i hope we can keep cashing tickets.... please let me know if i am wrong and it actually was the BEST system play of the day...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SixTen:
My POD is TOR ML
I know we've already played TOR 3 times recently, but getting +140 on a team who's the 2nd-best PR road team & falls into a 79% trend going against a pitcher who's been downright horrible since 2008 seems like it's as good a bet as we can ask for. Almost every ML we've seen so far has been minus money - a lot have been heavy chalk. I'm trusting the system, a trend and a terrible pitcher here.
I also booked the STL RL.
Good luck everyone!!
hey there sixten, first off i wanted to say you and everyone contributing to this thread are doing an AWESOME job and i definitely trust what you guys are doing..i really think you got something going on that is really good and i want to thank you for sharing this with all of us here at covers...i know nabil started this thread but he has been MIA for a bit.... i usually dont post cuz i dont want to clog up the thread but today i think i wanted to drop my 2 cents.... this is more of a question than a statement but did toronto really fit the system today? i tailed bllindly today since i had school and golf to take care of and noticed that it seems like TODAY you guys kinda didnt follow the system and went with a FADE, a dice-k fade...if im not mistaking the PR showed that TB and STL were the top plays....i dont study the PR as much as you guys but it seems like you just kinda of talked yourself into making TOR your POd...if im wrong im sorry but it seems like the +5 or more PR teams which were tb and st. louis today and even with a lot of juice they should of been the POD IMO.... i guess what im getting at is i would really appreciate if you guys sticked to the system than a DICE-K fade or fade anyone play...i trail blindly a lot because i know you guys do your hw and your record speaks for itself...obviously i should of read the whole thread but i know if i was home in front of a computer i would of just bet the cards and tb instead of cards and tor.... i hope i didnt offend you cuz that is not my intension at all, you do a great job and i hope u keep posting your pods...i enjoy this thread and i hope we can keep cashing tickets.... please let me know if i am wrong and it actually was the BEST system play of the day...
Thanks for the input - no offense taken. I hope you don't take any from the following...
The PR is simply used to narrow down the choices of games to take & then dissect each based on a ton of other info & make the best choice for a POD. We don't simply go by +5 or better as the PR ratings are leveling off - it's preferable, but at this point we're just looking for a significant difference. Otherwise, there'd be stretches where there's just one or two teams to choose between. Also, just because a game has a huge PR difference doesn't mean it's the right choice. You have to look at pitching matchups, injuries, weather, streaks, lineups, split stats, etc.
If it wasn't what I thought was the best POD, I wouldn't have dropped $$$ on it myself or labeled it my POD. I explained in detail why I thought TOR was the best play in a bunch of posts and STL was close behind - so I played both. Fading Dice-K was just a piece of the puzzle. Also, not everyone in this thread follows my plays...we sometimes differ on our POD's. There's no guarantee in the gambling world no matter what system is being used, and tailing something blindly isn't exactly the smartest way to build a bankroll. Sorry you lost money tonight, but we've been pretty profitable overall. The same thought process that got you fired up enough to tell us how to keep the thread going is the same that's gotten a bunch of people on board and in the green. Feel free to keep checking in - but you should do a little more homework in at least reading the reasons why we're making our picks and make sure you're confident in the ones you're tailing.
We're far from pros - just a bunch of people exchanging info and opinions for the same goal:
0
Thanks for the input - no offense taken. I hope you don't take any from the following...
The PR is simply used to narrow down the choices of games to take & then dissect each based on a ton of other info & make the best choice for a POD. We don't simply go by +5 or better as the PR ratings are leveling off - it's preferable, but at this point we're just looking for a significant difference. Otherwise, there'd be stretches where there's just one or two teams to choose between. Also, just because a game has a huge PR difference doesn't mean it's the right choice. You have to look at pitching matchups, injuries, weather, streaks, lineups, split stats, etc.
If it wasn't what I thought was the best POD, I wouldn't have dropped $$$ on it myself or labeled it my POD. I explained in detail why I thought TOR was the best play in a bunch of posts and STL was close behind - so I played both. Fading Dice-K was just a piece of the puzzle. Also, not everyone in this thread follows my plays...we sometimes differ on our POD's. There's no guarantee in the gambling world no matter what system is being used, and tailing something blindly isn't exactly the smartest way to build a bankroll. Sorry you lost money tonight, but we've been pretty profitable overall. The same thought process that got you fired up enough to tell us how to keep the thread going is the same that's gotten a bunch of people on board and in the green. Feel free to keep checking in - but you should do a little more homework in at least reading the reasons why we're making our picks and make sure you're confident in the ones you're tailing.
We're far from pros - just a bunch of people exchanging info and opinions for the same goal:
If i follow you trend reds would win the series and after analyse pitchers , reds would win tonight and loose after.
Toronto would win tonight tonight.
Nats would win tonight and lost after (not necessarily)
Phllies would win tonight and i think win after
Dodgers would lost tonight and Win after
Florida would win tonight and perhaps win after.
Braves would win tonight and lost after
Rays would win tonight and lost after
i play regarding your trend
IF a less ranked team wins the 1st 2 games... I dont play game 3...there are times where less or hi ranked teams wins all 3...cant predict that... happens a couple times in each series... sometimes alot (look at last series) Was crunchin numbers on that last night, will post later...didnt really find any strong trends in it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hart31:
If i follow you trend reds would win the series and after analyse pitchers , reds would win tonight and loose after.
Toronto would win tonight tonight.
Nats would win tonight and lost after (not necessarily)
Phllies would win tonight and i think win after
Dodgers would lost tonight and Win after
Florida would win tonight and perhaps win after.
Braves would win tonight and lost after
Rays would win tonight and lost after
i play regarding your trend
IF a less ranked team wins the 1st 2 games... I dont play game 3...there are times where less or hi ranked teams wins all 3...cant predict that... happens a couple times in each series... sometimes alot (look at last series) Was crunchin numbers on that last night, will post later...didnt really find any strong trends in it.
LAA in the middle of the pack against lefties - .248, 9 HR. They've beaten Price up the two times they've seen him (but that was early in his rookie year), while Weaver has tamed the Rays over 4 career starts (3-0, 2.77, 0.96, .200). Tough call here.
MIL is favored in the pitching matchup, and I'm not sure I feel comfortable picking ATL to complete the sweep behind Lowe even with Braun out. Over his career, Lowe's numbers are a bit worse during the day (last year 2-3, 5.73, 1.67, .329). Gallardo was much better during the day last year (5-6, 2.47, 1.24, .210) than night (8-6, 4.85, 1.38, .226). He's also 2-0 over 3 career starts vs ATL with a 0.81 ERA. Can't back ATL here.
0
LAA in the middle of the pack against lefties - .248, 9 HR. They've beaten Price up the two times they've seen him (but that was early in his rookie year), while Weaver has tamed the Rays over 4 career starts (3-0, 2.77, 0.96, .200). Tough call here.
MIL is favored in the pitching matchup, and I'm not sure I feel comfortable picking ATL to complete the sweep behind Lowe even with Braun out. Over his career, Lowe's numbers are a bit worse during the day (last year 2-3, 5.73, 1.67, .329). Gallardo was much better during the day last year (5-6, 2.47, 1.24, .210) than night (8-6, 4.85, 1.38, .226). He's also 2-0 over 3 career starts vs ATL with a 0.81 ERA. Can't back ATL here.
STL should bounce back. The pitching matchup features two guys the NL has been teeing off of so far this year. Rodriguez is 3-10 over 15 career starts vs STL with a 4.17/1.17/.252 line and has already dropped a game in STL this year (4.1 IP, 4 ER, 7 H, 2 BB, 0 K). Lohse sucks overall, but he's much better at home this year. In 3 starts, he's 0-1 but has a 2.70/0.95/.239 line including a tough loss to HOU where he tossed 7 innings giving up just 2 ER/5 H/0 BB. Advantage STL here.
Volstad is having a solid year for FLA. His ERA is inflated from 1 rough outing @ COL (4.1 IP, 7 ER) but he hasn't given up more than 3 runs in his 5 other starts. His WHIP & BAA are outstanding & he has a 2.81/1.01/.223 line in 4 career starts vs CHC. Silva has come back down to earth his past couple starts (10 IP, 18 H, 9 ER, 4 HR, 4 BB, 9 K) and remember, this is the same guy that still sports a 4.68/1.40/.303 line over 301 career games. Looks like FLA all the way here until you look at the team's batting stats during the day. CHC score almost 6 runs/game & hit .287 while FLA sports a 3.7 runs/game average & .239 BA. Think I'll avoid this one too.
0
STL should bounce back. The pitching matchup features two guys the NL has been teeing off of so far this year. Rodriguez is 3-10 over 15 career starts vs STL with a 4.17/1.17/.252 line and has already dropped a game in STL this year (4.1 IP, 4 ER, 7 H, 2 BB, 0 K). Lohse sucks overall, but he's much better at home this year. In 3 starts, he's 0-1 but has a 2.70/0.95/.239 line including a tough loss to HOU where he tossed 7 innings giving up just 2 ER/5 H/0 BB. Advantage STL here.
Volstad is having a solid year for FLA. His ERA is inflated from 1 rough outing @ COL (4.1 IP, 7 ER) but he hasn't given up more than 3 runs in his 5 other starts. His WHIP & BAA are outstanding & he has a 2.81/1.01/.223 line in 4 career starts vs CHC. Silva has come back down to earth his past couple starts (10 IP, 18 H, 9 ER, 4 HR, 4 BB, 9 K) and remember, this is the same guy that still sports a 4.68/1.40/.303 line over 301 career games. Looks like FLA all the way here until you look at the team's batting stats during the day. CHC score almost 6 runs/game & hit .287 while FLA sports a 3.7 runs/game average & .239 BA. Think I'll avoid this one too.
My total formula is based on an entirely different approach.
The play for last night was San Diego/ San Francisco under 7.5
A winner
The formula is 8-1 for the year so far : 4-0 playing the over and 4-1 playing the under.
Playing the over is the way to go which makes sense : there is a lot more room playing the over and you don't have to wait until the end of the game to find out whether you won or not. Also, if the teams go overtime, the overtime will only help the over and never the under.
I usually wait until the first week of June before I start using this approach. Another 2 weeks to go
Patience, patience
0
Quote Originally Posted by chiro111:
any word about totals formula Nable was talking about- this article might help- from covers
My total formula is based on an entirely different approach.
The play for last night was San Diego/ San Francisco under 7.5
A winner
The formula is 8-1 for the year so far : 4-0 playing the over and 4-1 playing the under.
Playing the over is the way to go which makes sense : there is a lot more room playing the over and you don't have to wait until the end of the game to find out whether you won or not. Also, if the teams go overtime, the overtime will only help the over and never the under.
I usually wait until the first week of June before I start using this approach. Another 2 weeks to go
My total formula is based on an entirely different approach.
The play for last night was San Diego/ San Francisco under 7.5
A winner
The formula is 8-1 for the year so far : 4-0 playing the over and 4-1 playing the under.
Playing the over is the way to go which makes sense : there is a lot more room playing the over and you don't have to wait until the end of the game to find out whether you won or not. Also, if the teams go overtime, the overtime will only help the over and never the under.
I usually wait until the first week of June before I start using this approach. Another 2 weeks to go
Patience, patience
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nabil:
Not even close, bud
My total formula is based on an entirely different approach.
The play for last night was San Diego/ San Francisco under 7.5
A winner
The formula is 8-1 for the year so far : 4-0 playing the over and 4-1 playing the under.
Playing the over is the way to go which makes sense : there is a lot more room playing the over and you don't have to wait until the end of the game to find out whether you won or not. Also, if the teams go overtime, the overtime will only help the over and never the under.
I usually wait until the first week of June before I start using this approach. Another 2 weeks to go
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.