ARI:
98.3 R Kennedy
(2-2, 3.48 ERA) 1.11 1.637.08 L6
ATL: 101.8 R Kawakami
(0-6, 5.73 ERA) 1.561.162.74 W3 +3.5 Arizona hasn't had a great batting day since they faced Houston at the beginning of this month.. Arizona is sucking balls right now with Bullpen ERA of 7.08 overall and an ERA of 10+ for the past 6 games. ATL is a good pick, but i think tomorrows pitching match up is a bit better... Lopez vs Hanson..
MIL: 93.8 L Wolf
(3-2, 3.95 ERA) 1.501.51 5.81 L3 10-20 mph winds West out to left field.. I know Wolf is younger than Moyer, but Wolf struggles to get through 5-6 innings.. and with a bullpen ERA of 5.81 i'm liking the phillys +115. Both teams bat about .250-.260 vs lefties. Moyer is an old fart, but also one of the few people on phillys who can pitch 6+ innings consistently.
0
Leaning on ATL and PHI today....
ARI:
98.3 R Kennedy
(2-2, 3.48 ERA) 1.11 1.637.08 L6
ATL: 101.8 R Kawakami
(0-6, 5.73 ERA) 1.561.162.74 W3 +3.5 Arizona hasn't had a great batting day since they faced Houston at the beginning of this month.. Arizona is sucking balls right now with Bullpen ERA of 7.08 overall and an ERA of 10+ for the past 6 games. ATL is a good pick, but i think tomorrows pitching match up is a bit better... Lopez vs Hanson..
MIL: 93.8 L Wolf
(3-2, 3.95 ERA) 1.501.51 5.81 L3 10-20 mph winds West out to left field.. I know Wolf is younger than Moyer, but Wolf struggles to get through 5-6 innings.. and with a bullpen ERA of 5.81 i'm liking the phillys +115. Both teams bat about .250-.260 vs lefties. Moyer is an old fart, but also one of the few people on phillys who can pitch 6+ innings consistently.
glefkb01 please explaine me your trend by MP cause i don't understand very well your trend
thanks you
I understand you don't bet games with money and you wait game 3 to predict the winner
I know too you use Power rating
i am waitting your message
thanks
MP?
I use the website Nabil showed everyone... Home Rating/Away Rating...I dont look at the differential as he suggests because I dont believe his system worked like he first described.
I have been writing down every game every ranking every day since the season began and noticed a trend that which ever team won game 1... that ranking won the series 80 percent of the time... I think that is pretty significant... I bet money and started doing well... The trend has never faded but it seems to have shifted to game 2 not 3 the last couple series... The trend actually went 11 for 12 the last series!!! as you all saw.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hart31:
glefkb01 please explaine me your trend by MP cause i don't understand very well your trend
thanks you
I understand you don't bet games with money and you wait game 3 to predict the winner
I know too you use Power rating
i am waitting your message
thanks
MP?
I use the website Nabil showed everyone... Home Rating/Away Rating...I dont look at the differential as he suggests because I dont believe his system worked like he first described.
I have been writing down every game every ranking every day since the season began and noticed a trend that which ever team won game 1... that ranking won the series 80 percent of the time... I think that is pretty significant... I bet money and started doing well... The trend has never faded but it seems to have shifted to game 2 not 3 the last couple series... The trend actually went 11 for 12 the last series!!! as you all saw.
If I have time, I should go back and look at the odds to all these games (which could take a while) and see if you just blindly bet game 2 and 3 if you would be up or down.
0
If I have time, I should go back and look at the odds to all these games (which could take a while) and see if you just blindly bet game 2 and 3 if you would be up or down.
I use the website Nabil showed everyone... Home Rating/Away Rating...I dont look at the differential as he suggests because I dont believe his system worked like he first described.
I have been writing down every game every ranking every day since the season began and noticed a trend that which ever team won game 1... that ranking won the series 80 percent of the time... I think that is pretty significant... I bet money and started doing well... The trend has never faded but it seems to have shifted to game 2 not 3 the last couple series... The trend actually went 11 for 12 the last series!!! as you all saw.
Any team that wins Game 1 has a 80% chance to win the Series /
Dude, I don't mean to rain on your party here but you have no trend here.
This is like saying : Any athlete who has a 5 second lead over the rest of the competition stands a 80% chance to win the race
This is not a trend. This is LOGIC.
Of course a team that wins Game 1 stands a good chance to win the series because all they have to do is win one more game
This is no trend.
0
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:
MP?
I use the website Nabil showed everyone... Home Rating/Away Rating...I dont look at the differential as he suggests because I dont believe his system worked like he first described.
I have been writing down every game every ranking every day since the season began and noticed a trend that which ever team won game 1... that ranking won the series 80 percent of the time... I think that is pretty significant... I bet money and started doing well... The trend has never faded but it seems to have shifted to game 2 not 3 the last couple series... The trend actually went 11 for 12 the last series!!! as you all saw.
Any team that wins Game 1 has a 80% chance to win the Series /
Dude, I don't mean to rain on your party here but you have no trend here.
This is like saying : Any athlete who has a 5 second lead over the rest of the competition stands a 80% chance to win the race
This is not a trend. This is LOGIC.
Of course a team that wins Game 1 stands a good chance to win the series because all they have to do is win one more game
Any team that wins Game 1 has a 80% chance to win the Series /
Dude, I don't mean to rain on your party here but you have no trend here.
This is like saying : Any athlete who has a 5 second lead over the rest of the competition stands a 80% chance to win the race
This is not a trend. This is LOGIC.
Of course a team that wins Game 1 stands a good chance to win the series because all they have to do is win one more game
This is no trend.
NOT TEAM ... its not specific to a team, its specific to a ranking... if you did have any logic, using these kind of trends could narrow games down, ie game 3 like this thread suggests...narrowing games using your website rankings to predict games.
are you still mad your part 1 system doesnt work. may if half over with and playing teams with high differentials are losing the series 50% of the time. then you change it to try to help before you got booted.
It is true, when you say a "TEAM THAT WINS GAME 1 will WIN THE SERIES" But the team that wins game 1 does not win the series but maybe 60% of the time ... The Ranking Team that wins game 1 has gone on to win 80% of the time...
Truth hurts... go see for yourself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nabil:
Any team that wins Game 1 has a 80% chance to win the Series /
Dude, I don't mean to rain on your party here but you have no trend here.
This is like saying : Any athlete who has a 5 second lead over the rest of the competition stands a 80% chance to win the race
This is not a trend. This is LOGIC.
Of course a team that wins Game 1 stands a good chance to win the series because all they have to do is win one more game
This is no trend.
NOT TEAM ... its not specific to a team, its specific to a ranking... if you did have any logic, using these kind of trends could narrow games down, ie game 3 like this thread suggests...narrowing games using your website rankings to predict games.
are you still mad your part 1 system doesnt work. may if half over with and playing teams with high differentials are losing the series 50% of the time. then you change it to try to help before you got booted.
It is true, when you say a "TEAM THAT WINS GAME 1 will WIN THE SERIES" But the team that wins game 1 does not win the series but maybe 60% of the time ... The Ranking Team that wins game 1 has gone on to win 80% of the time...
Any team that wins Game 1 has a 80% chance to win the Series /
Dude, I don't mean to rain on your party here but you have no trend here.
This is like saying : Any athlete who has a 5 second lead over the rest of the competition stands a 80% chance to win the race
This is not a trend. This is LOGIC.
Of course a team that wins Game 1 stands a good chance to win the series because all they have to do is win one more game
This is no trend.
I mean I know what you are trying to say... but I see it differently, the way you say it happens 60% of the time, this year. the way I have tracked it is 80% of the time... There is a slight difference.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nabil:
Any team that wins Game 1 has a 80% chance to win the Series /
Dude, I don't mean to rain on your party here but you have no trend here.
This is like saying : Any athlete who has a 5 second lead over the rest of the competition stands a 80% chance to win the race
This is not a trend. This is LOGIC.
Of course a team that wins Game 1 stands a good chance to win the series because all they have to do is win one more game
This is no trend.
I mean I know what you are trying to say... but I see it differently, the way you say it happens 60% of the time, this year. the way I have tracked it is 80% of the time... There is a slight difference.
NOT TEAM ... its not specific to a team, its specific to a ranking... if you did have any logic, using these kind of trends could narrow games down, ie game 3 like this thread suggests...narrowing games using your website rankings to predict games.
are you still mad your part 1 system doesnt work. may if half over with and playing teams with high differentials are losing the series 50% of the time. then you change it to try to help before you got booted.
It is true, when you say a "TEAM THAT WINS GAME 1 will WIN THE SERIES" But the team that wins game 1 does not win the series but maybe 60% of the time ... The Ranking Team that wins game 1 has gone on to win 80% of the time...
Truth hurts... go see for yourself.
Truth hurts ??? What truth are you talking about ?
Dude, please stop flattering yourself
What you are trying to present as a trend would have to be one of the most ridiculous shot at statistical mathematics I have ever seen.
Let me read that again : " Any team that wins Game 1 stands a pretty good chance to win the series "
Oh my, thanks for the help, Einstein ! I couldn't have figured that one out without your help
If you are in need of attention and if you are in search of your 15 minutes of fame, start your own thread and quit posting junk on this one.
You are not helping. On the contrary. You are diverting attention away in the pursuit of a so called trend which has no merit whatsoever
0
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:
NOT TEAM ... its not specific to a team, its specific to a ranking... if you did have any logic, using these kind of trends could narrow games down, ie game 3 like this thread suggests...narrowing games using your website rankings to predict games.
are you still mad your part 1 system doesnt work. may if half over with and playing teams with high differentials are losing the series 50% of the time. then you change it to try to help before you got booted.
It is true, when you say a "TEAM THAT WINS GAME 1 will WIN THE SERIES" But the team that wins game 1 does not win the series but maybe 60% of the time ... The Ranking Team that wins game 1 has gone on to win 80% of the time...
Truth hurts... go see for yourself.
Truth hurts ??? What truth are you talking about ?
Dude, please stop flattering yourself
What you are trying to present as a trend would have to be one of the most ridiculous shot at statistical mathematics I have ever seen.
Let me read that again : " Any team that wins Game 1 stands a pretty good chance to win the series "
Oh my, thanks for the help, Einstein ! I couldn't have figured that one out without your help
If you are in need of attention and if you are in search of your 15 minutes of fame, start your own thread and quit posting junk on this one.
You are not helping. On the contrary. You are diverting attention away in the pursuit of a so called trend which has no merit whatsoever
You are creating an analog of the system we are trying to execute.
So, if you hold off on Game 1, to see the results, which of the remaining two games do you wager on...........? Your numbers don't say these teams sweep. If your results are as strong as you mention and you have some protocol to use your results, start a new "Nabil analog" system thread, and you could put it in Mains or "Systems & Strategies".................
Above is a post from page 25 of this thread, I agree, I think glefkbo1
is trying to put in work and bring something to the thread, but its a
system based on a system inside the system thread cluttering up the
system.................Just start a new thread, why not, you can have
all the info. in one thread...........
0
Quote Originally Posted by moksha23x:
You are creating an analog of the system we are trying to execute.
So, if you hold off on Game 1, to see the results, which of the remaining two games do you wager on...........? Your numbers don't say these teams sweep. If your results are as strong as you mention and you have some protocol to use your results, start a new "Nabil analog" system thread, and you could put it in Mains or "Systems & Strategies".................
Above is a post from page 25 of this thread, I agree, I think glefkbo1
is trying to put in work and bring something to the thread, but its a
system based on a system inside the system thread cluttering up the
system.................Just start a new thread, why not, you can have
all the info. in one thread...........
Hopefully today we can start a winning streak.I am down to 3 teams as today's play of the day.They are the Red Sox,Rays,or Padres.In put anyone?
These three are ones you'll choose your "System POD" , right? Is the Red Sox option a mistake, they have a -3.9 disadvantage, they do have a pitching matchup advantage.........but that's not the system, typo?
Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD options.........Anyone, Input?
0
Quote Originally Posted by capskip:
Hopefully today we can start a winning streak.I am down to 3 teams as today's play of the day.They are the Red Sox,Rays,or Padres.In put anyone?
These three are ones you'll choose your "System POD" , right? Is the Red Sox option a mistake, they have a -3.9 disadvantage, they do have a pitching matchup advantage.........but that's not the system, typo?
Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD options.........Anyone, Input?
Truth hurts ??? What truth are you talking about ?
Dude, please stop flattering yourself
What you are trying to present as a trend would have to be one of the most ridiculous shot at statistical mathematics I have ever seen.
Let me read that again : " Any team that wins Game 1 stands a pretty good chance to win the series "
Oh my, thanks for the help, Einstein ! I couldn't have figured that one out without your help
If you are in need of attention and if you are in search of your 15 minutes of fame, start your own thread and quit posting junk on this one.
You are not helping. On the contrary. You are diverting attention away in the pursuit of a so called trend which has no merit whatsoever
Didnt you abdandon this thread because you 70%stat was not working out so well... exactly. That is the ABSOLUT truth... that is why you started getting mad at me for pointing out , whatever dude. This conversation of teaching you anything is diverting away from this thread.
AS I SAID... Its not rocket science, its not math related... its a freiken trend... you know something that happens for some unknown reason... its easy to say that the team that wins game 1 willl win 1of the next 2... THATS NOT WHAT I AM SAYING AT ALL...
BASED on your website rankings... ANY RANKINGS... the TRUTH is 60% of the teams that win game 1 win 1 of the next 2. THAT IS WHERE WE AGREE...
THE DIFFERENCE ABOUT WHAT I SAID and the TRUTH is 80% of the time the team that RANKS (THAT IS THE KEY) wins the series...
After trending all your bull shit in the first few pages of this thread...ITS LIKE CALLING WHAT YOU SAID... OOO THE TEAM THAT RANKS HIGHEST WINS THE SERIES... ISNT THAT SAYING THE TEAM THAT IS BETTER WINS!!!!.. dont flatter yourself...
NABIL IS A GENIUS... Guys following the thread... the team that is better wins 70% of the time... WOW!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nabil:
Truth hurts ??? What truth are you talking about ?
Dude, please stop flattering yourself
What you are trying to present as a trend would have to be one of the most ridiculous shot at statistical mathematics I have ever seen.
Let me read that again : " Any team that wins Game 1 stands a pretty good chance to win the series "
Oh my, thanks for the help, Einstein ! I couldn't have figured that one out without your help
If you are in need of attention and if you are in search of your 15 minutes of fame, start your own thread and quit posting junk on this one.
You are not helping. On the contrary. You are diverting attention away in the pursuit of a so called trend which has no merit whatsoever
Didnt you abdandon this thread because you 70%stat was not working out so well... exactly. That is the ABSOLUT truth... that is why you started getting mad at me for pointing out , whatever dude. This conversation of teaching you anything is diverting away from this thread.
AS I SAID... Its not rocket science, its not math related... its a freiken trend... you know something that happens for some unknown reason... its easy to say that the team that wins game 1 willl win 1of the next 2... THATS NOT WHAT I AM SAYING AT ALL...
BASED on your website rankings... ANY RANKINGS... the TRUTH is 60% of the teams that win game 1 win 1 of the next 2. THAT IS WHERE WE AGREE...
THE DIFFERENCE ABOUT WHAT I SAID and the TRUTH is 80% of the time the team that RANKS (THAT IS THE KEY) wins the series...
After trending all your bull shit in the first few pages of this thread...ITS LIKE CALLING WHAT YOU SAID... OOO THE TEAM THAT RANKS HIGHEST WINS THE SERIES... ISNT THAT SAYING THE TEAM THAT IS BETTER WINS!!!!.. dont flatter yourself...
NABIL IS A GENIUS... Guys following the thread... the team that is better wins 70% of the time... WOW!!!
Didnt you abdandon this thread because you 70%stat was not working out so well... exactly. That is the ABSOLUT truth... that is why you started getting mad at me for pointing out , whatever dude. This conversation of teaching you anything is diverting away from this thread.
AS I SAID... Its not rocket science, its not math related... its a freiken trend... you know something that happens for some unknown reason... its easy to say that the team that wins game 1 willl win 1of the next 2... THATS NOT WHAT I AM SAYING AT ALL...
BASED on your website rankings... ANY RANKINGS... the TRUTH is 60% of the teams that win game 1 win 1 of the next 2. THAT IS WHERE WE AGREE...
THE DIFFERENCE ABOUT WHAT I SAID and the TRUTH is 80% of the time the team that RANKS (THAT IS THE KEY) wins the series...
After trending all your bull shit in the first few pages of this thread...ITS LIKE CALLING WHAT YOU SAID... OOO THE TEAM THAT RANKS HIGHEST WINS THE SERIES... ISNT THAT SAYING THE TEAM THAT IS BETTER WINS!!!!.. dont flatter yourself...
NABIL IS A GENIUS... Guys following the thread... the team that is better wins 70% of the time... WOW!!!
Guy......No one is calling nabil a genius......He shared a filter system, to filter out the best picks of the day...........It has been working,(bumps in the road as of late), .............Why are you here if you think its worthless?..........I've noticed you have been putting in work mapping trends but why clutter a thread that people are trying to work together on, why clutter it with your "trend System" and your bullshit hating on Nabil............Dude start your own thread, I'll go visit it, I'm sure others will.........Why hate, No one wins...........
BOL!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:
Didnt you abdandon this thread because you 70%stat was not working out so well... exactly. That is the ABSOLUT truth... that is why you started getting mad at me for pointing out , whatever dude. This conversation of teaching you anything is diverting away from this thread.
AS I SAID... Its not rocket science, its not math related... its a freiken trend... you know something that happens for some unknown reason... its easy to say that the team that wins game 1 willl win 1of the next 2... THATS NOT WHAT I AM SAYING AT ALL...
BASED on your website rankings... ANY RANKINGS... the TRUTH is 60% of the teams that win game 1 win 1 of the next 2. THAT IS WHERE WE AGREE...
THE DIFFERENCE ABOUT WHAT I SAID and the TRUTH is 80% of the time the team that RANKS (THAT IS THE KEY) wins the series...
After trending all your bull shit in the first few pages of this thread...ITS LIKE CALLING WHAT YOU SAID... OOO THE TEAM THAT RANKS HIGHEST WINS THE SERIES... ISNT THAT SAYING THE TEAM THAT IS BETTER WINS!!!!.. dont flatter yourself...
NABIL IS A GENIUS... Guys following the thread... the team that is better wins 70% of the time... WOW!!!
Guy......No one is calling nabil a genius......He shared a filter system, to filter out the best picks of the day...........It has been working,(bumps in the road as of late), .............Why are you here if you think its worthless?..........I've noticed you have been putting in work mapping trends but why clutter a thread that people are trying to work together on, why clutter it with your "trend System" and your bullshit hating on Nabil............Dude start your own thread, I'll go visit it, I'm sure others will.........Why hate, No one wins...........
These three are ones you'll choose your "System POD" , right? Is the Red Sox option a mistake, they have a -3.9 disadvantage, they do have a pitching matchup advantage.........but that's not the system, typo?
Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD options.........Anyone, Input?
Any Input......????
0
Quote Originally Posted by moksha23x:
These three are ones you'll choose your "System POD" , right? Is the Red Sox option a mistake, they have a -3.9 disadvantage, they do have a pitching matchup advantage.........but that's not the system, typo?
Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD options.........Anyone, Input?
Guy......No one is calling nabil a genius......He shared a filter system, to filter out the best picks of the day...........It has been working,(bumps in the road as of late), .............Why are you here if you think its worthless?..........I've noticed you have been putting in work mapping trends but why clutter a thread that people are trying to work together on, why clutter it with your "trend System" and your bullshit hating on Nabil............Dude start your own thread, I'll go visit it, I'm sure others will.........Why hate, No one wins...........
BOL!!!
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All i am doing is posting info on rankings.. I have not fabricated anything... When Nabil started here... I followed. He singled out games and stated you could predict series with ranking differentials... Although he didnt do very well when I trended his series predictions... he picked a couple winners and got booted off.
He started the hating when I said his series prediction wasnt working. People seemed to appreciate my trending so I continue to find value in following SIXTEN and peeps like that. I dont hate Nabil... I just am not going to sit here and take crap from him twisting what I am saying. Arguing back and forth is diverting from this thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by moksha23x:
Guy......No one is calling nabil a genius......He shared a filter system, to filter out the best picks of the day...........It has been working,(bumps in the road as of late), .............Why are you here if you think its worthless?..........I've noticed you have been putting in work mapping trends but why clutter a thread that people are trying to work together on, why clutter it with your "trend System" and your bullshit hating on Nabil............Dude start your own thread, I'll go visit it, I'm sure others will.........Why hate, No one wins...........
BOL!!!
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All i am doing is posting info on rankings.. I have not fabricated anything... When Nabil started here... I followed. He singled out games and stated you could predict series with ranking differentials... Although he didnt do very well when I trended his series predictions... he picked a couple winners and got booted off.
He started the hating when I said his series prediction wasnt working. People seemed to appreciate my trending so I continue to find value in following SIXTEN and peeps like that. I dont hate Nabil... I just am not going to sit here and take crap from him twisting what I am saying. Arguing back and forth is diverting from this thread.
These three are ones you'll choose your "System POD" , right? Is the Red Sox option a mistake, they have a -3.9 disadvantage, they do have a pitching matchup advantage.........but that's not the system, typo?
Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD options.........Anyone, Input?
Ok .......F the drama......How do people feel about SD or PHI as POD's............I'm feeling SD as the strongest and potentially my POD.......Anyone, Sixten, Nabil, Capskip.....? anyone out there?
0
Quote Originally Posted by moksha23x:
These three are ones you'll choose your "System POD" , right? Is the Red Sox option a mistake, they have a -3.9 disadvantage, they do have a pitching matchup advantage.........but that's not the system, typo?
Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD options.........Anyone, Input?
Ok .......F the drama......How do people feel about SD or PHI as POD's............I'm feeling SD as the strongest and potentially my POD.......Anyone, Sixten, Nabil, Capskip.....? anyone out there?
ARI:
98.3 R Kennedy
(2-2, 3.48 ERA) 1.11 1.637.08 L6
ATL: 101.8 R Kawakami
(0-6, 5.73 ERA) 1.561.162.74 W3 +3.5 Arizona hasn't had a great batting day since they faced Houston at the beginning of this month.. Arizona is sucking balls right now with Bullpen ERA of 7.08 overall and an ERA of 10+ for the past 6 games. ATL is a good pick, but i think tomorrows pitching match up is a bit better... Lopez vs Hanson..
MIL: 93.8 L Wolf
(3-2, 3.95 ERA) 1.501.51 5.81 L3 10-20 mph winds West out to left field.. I know Wolf is younger than Moyer, but Wolf struggles to get through 5-6 innings.. and with a bullpen ERA of 5.81 i'm liking the phillys +115. Both teams bat about .250-.260 vs lefties. Moyer is an old fart, but also one of the few people on phillys who can pitch 6+ innings consistently.
GmasterAl
You like ATL as a possible POD........How do you feel about the pitching matchup.....Kawakami? Are you leaning more towards PHI? How do you feel about SD as a POD?
0
Quote Originally Posted by GrandMasterAL:
Leaning on ATL and PHI today....
ARI:
98.3 R Kennedy
(2-2, 3.48 ERA) 1.11 1.637.08 L6
ATL: 101.8 R Kawakami
(0-6, 5.73 ERA) 1.561.162.74 W3 +3.5 Arizona hasn't had a great batting day since they faced Houston at the beginning of this month.. Arizona is sucking balls right now with Bullpen ERA of 7.08 overall and an ERA of 10+ for the past 6 games. ATL is a good pick, but i think tomorrows pitching match up is a bit better... Lopez vs Hanson..
MIL: 93.8 L Wolf
(3-2, 3.95 ERA) 1.501.51 5.81 L3 10-20 mph winds West out to left field.. I know Wolf is younger than Moyer, but Wolf struggles to get through 5-6 innings.. and with a bullpen ERA of 5.81 i'm liking the phillys +115. Both teams bat about .250-.260 vs lefties. Moyer is an old fart, but also one of the few people on phillys who can pitch 6+ innings consistently.
GmasterAl
You like ATL as a possible POD........How do you feel about the pitching matchup.....Kawakami? Are you leaning more towards PHI? How do you feel about SD as a POD?
All i am doing is posting info on rankings.. I have not fabricated anything... When Nabil started here... I followed. He singled out games and stated you could predict series with ranking differentials... Although he didnt do very well when I trended his series predictions... he picked a couple winners and got booted off.
He started the hating when I said his series prediction wasnt working. People seemed to appreciate my trending so I continue to find value in following SIXTEN and peeps like that. I dont hate Nabil... I just am not going to sit here and take crap from him twisting what I am saying. Arguing back and forth is diverting from this thread.
Dude ! What is there to twist ?
Your trend is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
Is that the best you can do ? Of course it is. What am I even asking the question when the answer is so obvious
Of course a team winning the first game stands a pretty good chance to win the series. All they need to do is win another game and they won
Did you honestly think you would impress anybody with garbage like that ?
If you believed that, you are then a bigger idiot than I think you are
0
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All i am doing is posting info on rankings.. I have not fabricated anything... When Nabil started here... I followed. He singled out games and stated you could predict series with ranking differentials... Although he didnt do very well when I trended his series predictions... he picked a couple winners and got booted off.
He started the hating when I said his series prediction wasnt working. People seemed to appreciate my trending so I continue to find value in following SIXTEN and peeps like that. I dont hate Nabil... I just am not going to sit here and take crap from him twisting what I am saying. Arguing back and forth is diverting from this thread.
Dude ! What is there to twist ?
Your trend is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
Is that the best you can do ? Of course it is. What am I even asking the question when the answer is so obvious
Of course a team winning the first game stands a pretty good chance to win the series. All they need to do is win another game and they won
Did you honestly think you would impress anybody with garbage like that ?
If you believed that, you are then a bigger idiot than I think you are
All i am doing is posting info on rankings.. I have not fabricated anything... When Nabil started here... I followed. He singled out games and stated you could predict series with ranking differentials... Although he didnt do very well when I trended his series predictions... he picked a couple winners and got booted off.
He started the hating when I said his series prediction wasnt working. People seemed to appreciate my trending so I continue to find value in following SIXTEN and peeps like that. I dont hate Nabil... I just am not going to sit here and take crap from him twisting what I am saying. Arguing back and forth is diverting from this thread.
Dude ! Since you seem to like idiotic trends, here is one for you :
" Anybody who takes a shower stands a 100% chance of getting wet"
Try to make a few pennies betting on that one
0
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All i am doing is posting info on rankings.. I have not fabricated anything... When Nabil started here... I followed. He singled out games and stated you could predict series with ranking differentials... Although he didnt do very well when I trended his series predictions... he picked a couple winners and got booted off.
He started the hating when I said his series prediction wasnt working. People seemed to appreciate my trending so I continue to find value in following SIXTEN and peeps like that. I dont hate Nabil... I just am not going to sit here and take crap from him twisting what I am saying. Arguing back and forth is diverting from this thread.
Dude ! Since you seem to like idiotic trends, here is one for you :
" Anybody who takes a shower stands a 100% chance of getting wet"
We are all here to pull any important info we can find. Everyone has
their own betting strategy and system. If a certain system or trend
seems flawed or retarded, then just ignore it and don't follow their
picks...
Anywho fuck all this negativity... on with capping..... QUOTE Originally Posted by moksha23x: Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my
possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD
options.........Anyone, Input?
I like Padres as well.... On paper, Padres should dominate... A bit of wind but nothing serious.. Hope their pitching holds up...
The Philly +115 line makes me think.... Its too good to be true... Obviously philly is the better team.... i know the best OBP player carlos ruiz is out, but what else can there be? Maybe Vegas thinks old man Moyer cant pitch another great game...
0
We are all here to pull any important info we can find. Everyone has
their own betting strategy and system. If a certain system or trend
seems flawed or retarded, then just ignore it and don't follow their
picks...
Anywho fuck all this negativity... on with capping..... QUOTE Originally Posted by moksha23x: Anyway I'm with you on the Padres as one of my
possible POD's......I'm down to PHIL and SD as my two possible POD
options.........Anyone, Input?
I like Padres as well.... On paper, Padres should dominate... A bit of wind but nothing serious.. Hope their pitching holds up...
The Philly +115 line makes me think.... Its too good to be true... Obviously philly is the better team.... i know the best OBP player carlos ruiz is out, but what else can there be? Maybe Vegas thinks old man Moyer cant pitch another great game...
My POD is Tampa Bay even though Seattle's pitcher Fister era is only 1.71.Seattle just does not hit well,or score many runs.Also they are only batting 235 o the road.TB RL. Bol Cap
0
My POD is Tampa Bay even though Seattle's pitcher Fister era is only 1.71.Seattle just does not hit well,or score many runs.Also they are only batting 235 o the road.TB RL. Bol Cap
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Guys following the thread... the team that is better wins 70% of the time... WOW!!!
Hot Forum Topics
