All Forums | Website Promotions

Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 1897038
Posts: 12682
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9876
Lank66    29-24-1

Over 197.5 MIA Heat - CHA Bobcats

BigUnit  31-27

PHO Suns +6

CHI Bulls +3

Heads2134   18-15

MIN Timberwolves -3

Under 200.5 DAL Mavericks - UTAH Jazz

Eryximaque 30-27-1

Under 206 OKC Thunder-POR T'Blazers

MIN Timberwolves -3
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9877
AshyLarryMP 41-40-2:

MIA Heat -17

PHO Suns +6

MIN Timberwolves -2.5

Jpaco 32-33-1

Over 202.5 MIL Bucks - ATL Hawks

SA Spurs -1

OKC Thurnder -11.5

LoLITiltU 1-1


Under 205.0 OKC Thunder - POR Trailblazers

MIA Heat -17.0

MIN Timberwolves -3.0

Musicmatt1 38-43-1

Under 202.5  MIL Bucks - ATL Hawks

Under 212.5  HOU Rockets - SA Spurs

Under 205.5 OKC Thunder - POR Trailblazers

SunsDevils 24-27

MIN Timberwolves -2

joferrer90   0-1

Under 205.5 OKC Thunder - POR Trailblazzers

Under 212    HOU Rockets - SA Spurs

KrishBreezy 22-20

SA Spurs -1

MIN Timberwolves +1

BKN Nets -5.5

dastovski365 1-0

OKC Thunder -12

Fuzzrod 7-9

MIN Timberwolves -3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 7
Posted: #9878

Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2814
Location: Ontario
#9954
Posted: 3/24/2013 3:18:15 PM
Fuzzman, if I was you I'd take Twolves -5 in the second half. I trust King and Phixer more than I trust the Bulls



Well said! The T'wolves are getting dominated on the boards, especially offensive, but I have faith that they will make this correction and start to work themselves back into this game! 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 230
Posted: #9879
Quote Originally Posted by jpaco:



see what? what a loser.. u saying u thought cappers here are so good but then u yourself calling mia won't be covering cha?  


xaxaxa??? bobcats suk xDD that was just luck

see wolves. they SUK- 70-58 losing @ home. pathetic!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 230
Posted: #9880
Quote Originally Posted by Puinsai808:


Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2814
Location: Ontario
#9954
Posted: 3/24/2013 3:18:15 PM
Fuzzman, if I was you I'd take Twolves -5 in the second half. I trust King and Phixer more than I trust the Bulls



Well said! The T'wolves are getting dominated on the boards, especially offensive, but I have faith that they will make this correction and start to work themselves back into this game! 



73-62 losing with 2:34 left in 3rd.

When will they start to do something?? wolves S U K what a joke of team
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 230
Posted: #9881
well if wolves make a 4th quarter like miami (20-36) they will cover and win sad team wolves....

78-68 end of 3rd
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 19
Posted: #9882
Quote Originally Posted by Melo7:

I LOVE "NBACASPER" right here.
 
good to know
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 442
Posted: #9883
If the Wolves fail to cover, it's not because it was the wrong play.

Nor was it because anyone "told us so." 

Mavin is correct, should have protected yourself with the 2H Line because Bulls just need to win and doesn't care the amount. Also, the 3Q Timberwolves -2 play was another good way to protect yourself.

Please, please, please remain positive until the conclusion of the game. If you felt confident enough to place the bet, you should not consider it hopeless 5 minutes in.

BOL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 1676
Posted: #9884
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:

nbacasper - please calm down buddy. The game is not over and I also read your opinion about the heat. This is no grocery store for picks neither and I suggest you manage your money well as there's no way you can argue with the fact that the cappers are good. But they don't work for you or me but themselves first of all.



Turbo buddy - -155 was the line everyewhere and I don't mind taking your pick off - but remember none of it is for one game only. Please everyone give up on your egos and remember why we're here.


I know its not about one game but when I want a spread I always post it when I do ML also- even if I buy the points but what is the cutoff for - lines- 110 is standard so is 115 ML not good? we should have some type of standard.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 72
Posted: #9885
Quote Originally Posted by Musicmatt1:

If the Wolves fail to cover, it's not because it was the wrong play.


What do u mean with that? U can be on the right side and still lose - bad beats, but losing the whole game by 10+, and u have a fav -3....what is the wrong play then for you?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 72
Posted: #9886
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:


I know its not about one game but when I want a spread I always post it when I do ML also- even if I buy the points but what is the cutoff for - lines- 110 is standard so is 115 ML not good? we should have some type of standard.

betting on spread...i thought everybody was already doing that, that would mean -110 jea
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 7
Posted: #9887
Late to the game here but can someone explain what is going on this thread. I don't feel like shuffling through 400 pages. Thanks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 209
Posted: #9888
Eryximaque 30-27-1

Under 102.5 SAC Kings - PHI 6ers

Dunno if it's too late to add one, but Kings played yesterday, and i dont see them reach 102.5
Indeed Phi likes under trends


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 209
Posted: #9889
Eryximaque 30-27-1



Under 102.5 1H SAC Kings - PHI 6ers

Dunno if it's too late to add one, but Kings played yesterday, and i dont see them reach 102.5
Indeed Phi likes under trends

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9890
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:


I know its not about one game but when I want a spread I always post it when I do ML also- even if I buy the points but what is the cutoff for - lines- 110 is standard so is 115 ML not good? we should have some type of standard.

I am saying again - the odds were -155, not -115
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9891
TWolves covered second half spread
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 1676
Posted: #9892
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:


I am saying again - the odds were -155, not -115

Mavin I know the ML was -155 I did not dispute that I just want to know what is the lowest ML we can buy on the (-) side- is -115 good is -120 good etc. for future reference- I know the ML for this was -155 I placed the bet. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 282
Posted: #9893
Quote Originally Posted by nbacasper:



xaxaxa??? bobcats suk xDD that was just luck

see wolves. they SUK- 70-58 losing @ home. pathetic!!!

they just suck cuz u prolly lose your bet on them... so i wonder who's pathetic 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 1676
Posted: #9894
and prob the same should be made on ML on the (+) side- since I bet +900 some times would be good to know where do we stop as to know how to post it.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9895
KingMidasTouch  25-8-2

MIN TimberWolves -2.5

MIA Heat -17 

phixer 18-6-1

MIN Timberwolves -3

Under 211.5. HOU Rockets - SA Spurs  

Turbovtk 25-15-2

Lopelpickscom 29-19-1
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9896
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:

and prob the same should be made on ML on the (+) side- since I bet +900 some times would be good to know where do we stop as to know how to post it.
I don't like this beating around the bushes talk. I can even say that I really don't enjoy doing this with you. What's on your mind? You wanna raise? We'll talk at the end of the month. Right now salary stays the same! -110
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #9897
And to those who whine about the TWolves. Some of the greatest handicappers outside I know had a banker on TWolves. tWolves were the play that went wrong for some reasons and the Bulls will pay for that pretty soon. It always happens after accidents. I did not have that play but did suggest playing TWolves second half and on the same play the same handicappers outside cashed on too. This is a dynamic business and thats what second half opportunities are for. Please learn from that. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2595
Posted: #9898
Tough beat with the Wolves... I wonder what was up with the reverse line movement? Was it so us gamblers would all hop on Minnesota?

Chicago overmatched them every minute of the game...

Something for me to consider next time I see line movement like that... Sometimes you'll just have to go with the better team regardless
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2595
Posted: #9899
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:

And to those who whine about the TWolves. Some of the greatest handicappers outside I know had a banker on TWolves. tWolves were the play that went wrong for some reasons and the Bulls will pay for that pretty soon. It always happens after accidents. I did not have that play but did suggest playing TWolves second half and on the same play the same handicappers outside cashed on too. This is a dynamic business and thats what second half opportunities are for. Please learn from that. 



Yeah dude... It's a stone cold business... Theres the odd time-like tonight, where all the stars align and we jump on a play and it fails... Can't get discouraged as these plays will hit more often than not... If you can't take a little bankroll fluctuation then you shouldn't be gambling
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 7
Posted: #9900
Quote Originally Posted by thomasdrrn:

Late to the game here but can someone explain what is going on this thread. I don't feel like shuffling through 400 pages. Thanks.

?
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.