Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
Don't know if this helps you guys, but did some research on the Heat. They've played 4 TNT Thursday night games this year:
11/15 @ DEN (Late Game) W - 98-93
11/29 vs SA (Late Game) - W - 105-100
12/06 @ NY (Early Game) L - 92-112
12/20 @ DAL (Late Game) - W 110-95
Note the 3 wins were all West Coast games by a margin greater than 3 and all on the late game on TNT Thursday.
- Heat are 7-2 ATS in the last 9 meetings in Portland.
Only thing preventing me from pulling the trigger are:
- Heat are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
- Heat are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games playing on 1 days rest.
- Heat are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games overall.
- Heat are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 road games.
- Trail Blazers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600.
- Trail Blazers are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record.
- Trail Blazers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games following a ATS loss.
Don't know if this helps you guys, but did some research on the Heat. They've played 4 TNT Thursday night games this year:
11/15 @ DEN (Late Game) W - 98-93
11/29 vs SA (Late Game) - W - 105-100
12/06 @ NY (Early Game) L - 92-112
12/20 @ DAL (Late Game) - W 110-95
Note the 3 wins were all West Coast games by a margin greater than 3 and all on the late game on TNT Thursday.
- Heat are 7-2 ATS in the last 9 meetings in Portland.
Only thing preventing me from pulling the trigger are:
- Heat are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
- Heat are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games playing on 1 days rest.
- Heat are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games overall.
- Heat are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 road games.
- Trail Blazers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600.
- Trail Blazers are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record.
- Trail Blazers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games following a ATS loss.
IIMO, gents.....this doesn't qualify for a "reverse".
5 Deemers just kicked it up to MIA -3.5.......not sure a reverse can change course and still be a reverse.
NO and IND went continually one way.
Bummed out....gotta buy back..........Gl to the crew !!...............![]()
IIMO, gents.....this doesn't qualify for a "reverse".
5 Deemers just kicked it up to MIA -3.5.......not sure a reverse can change course and still be a reverse.
NO and IND went continually one way.
Bummed out....gotta buy back..........Gl to the crew !!...............![]()
01/10/2013 @ 08:00 PM NBA
[501] NEW YORK +7-150 (B+2)
01/10/2013 @ 08:00 PM NBA
[502] TOTAL u186-150 (B+2)
(NEW YORK vrs INDIANA)
01/10/2013 @ 10:05 PM NBA
[504] SACRAMENTO -½-150 (B+2)
01/10/2013 @ 10:05 PM NBA
[504] TOTAL u208-150 (B+2)
(DALLAS vrs SACRAMENTO)
01/10/2013 @ 10:35 PM NBA
[505] MIAMI -160
01/10/2013 @ 10:35 PM NBA
[506] TOTAL u196½-150 (B+2)
(MIAMI vrs PORTLAND)
01/10/2013 @ 05:16 PM
OPEN PLAY
01/10/2013 @ 05:16 PM
OPEN PLAY
50.00 3758.20
01/10/2013 @ 08:00 PM NBA
[501] NEW YORK +7-150 (B+2)
01/10/2013 @ 08:00 PM NBA
[502] TOTAL u186-150 (B+2)
(NEW YORK vrs INDIANA)
01/10/2013 @ 10:05 PM NBA
[504] SACRAMENTO -½-150 (B+2)
01/10/2013 @ 10:05 PM NBA
[504] TOTAL u208-150 (B+2)
(DALLAS vrs SACRAMENTO)
01/10/2013 @ 10:35 PM NBA
[505] MIAMI -160
01/10/2013 @ 10:35 PM NBA
[506] TOTAL u196½-150 (B+2)
(MIAMI vrs PORTLAND)
01/10/2013 @ 05:16 PM
OPEN PLAY
01/10/2013 @ 05:16 PM
OPEN PLAY
50.00 3758.20
Final:
Oh boy, I remember what happened last time we bet kings. LOL.. but nonetheless, i will be backing you tonight for 2units on kings-2.5.. Lets get this!! ![]()
![]()
![]()
Final:
Oh boy, I remember what happened last time we bet kings. LOL.. but nonetheless, i will be backing you tonight for 2units on kings-2.5.. Lets get this!! ![]()
![]()
![]()
Melo, any reason so much confidence on the Pacers by 5 points? Is it because Felton and Melo are out?
Don't know if this helps you guys, but did some research on the Heat. They've played 4 TNT Thursday night games this year:
11/15 @ DEN (Late Game) W - 98-93
11/29 vs SA (Late Game) - W - 105-100
12/06 @ NY (Early Game) L - 92-112
12/20 @ DAL (Late Game) - W 110-95
Note the 3 wins were all West Coast games by a margin greater than 3 and all on the late game on TNT Thursday.
- Heat are 7-2 ATS in the last 9 meetings in Portland.
Only thing preventing me from pulling the trigger are:
- Heat are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
- Heat are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games playing on 1 days rest.
- Heat are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games overall.
- Heat are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 road games.
- Trail Blazers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600.
- Trail Blazers are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record.
- Trail Blazers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games following a ATS loss.
Melo, any reason so much confidence on the Pacers by 5 points? Is it because Felton and Melo are out?
Don't know if this helps you guys, but did some research on the Heat. They've played 4 TNT Thursday night games this year:
11/15 @ DEN (Late Game) W - 98-93
11/29 vs SA (Late Game) - W - 105-100
12/06 @ NY (Early Game) L - 92-112
12/20 @ DAL (Late Game) - W 110-95
Note the 3 wins were all West Coast games by a margin greater than 3 and all on the late game on TNT Thursday.
- Heat are 7-2 ATS in the last 9 meetings in Portland.
Only thing preventing me from pulling the trigger are:
- Heat are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
- Heat are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games playing on 1 days rest.
- Heat are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games overall.
- Heat are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 road games.
- Trail Blazers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600.
- Trail Blazers are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record.
- Trail Blazers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games following a ATS loss.
Melo, any reason so much confidence on the Pacers by 5 points? Is it because Felton and Melo are out?
Don't know if this helps you guys, but did some research on the Heat. They've played 4 TNT Thursday night games this year:
11/15 @ DEN (Late Game) W - 98-93
11/29 vs SA (Late Game) - W - 105-100
12/06 @ NY (Early Game) L - 92-112
12/20 @ DAL (Late Game) - W 110-95
Note the 3 wins were all West Coast games by a margin greater than 3 and all on the late game on TNT Thursday.
- Heat are 7-2 ATS in the last 9 meetings in Portland.
Only thing preventing me from pulling the trigger are:
- Heat are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
- Heat are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games playing on 1 days rest.
- Heat are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games overall.
- Heat are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 road games.
- Trail Blazers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600.
- Trail Blazers are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record.
- Trail Blazers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games following a ATS loss.
Melo, any reason so much confidence on the Pacers by 5 points? Is it because Felton and Melo are out?
Don't know if this helps you guys, but did some research on the Heat. They've played 4 TNT Thursday night games this year:
11/15 @ DEN (Late Game) W - 98-93
11/29 vs SA (Late Game) - W - 105-100
12/06 @ NY (Early Game) L - 92-112
12/20 @ DAL (Late Game) - W 110-95
Note the 3 wins were all West Coast games by a margin greater than 3 and all on the late game on TNT Thursday.
- Heat are 7-2 ATS in the last 9 meetings in Portland.
Only thing preventing me from pulling the trigger are:
- Heat are 1-4 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
- Heat are 1-5 ATS in their last 6 games playing on 1 days rest.
- Heat are 1-6 ATS in their last 7 games overall.
- Heat are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 road games.
- Trail Blazers are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games vs. a team with a winning % above .600.
- Trail Blazers are 6-0 ATS in their last 6 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record.
- Trail Blazers are 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games following a ATS loss.
what is suspicious though is although I'm sure the public is slamming Miami 60/40 or 65/35, the line has not moved since opening at 3. I see its 3.5 some places, but still 3 on my book.
Got me handcuffed too, playing.
Mav (got it right), could you chip in on the reverse theory.
If a reverse movement changes direction, does that cancel its catergorization as a reverse.
With NO and IND no counter movement occurred.
what is suspicious though is although I'm sure the public is slamming Miami 60/40 or 65/35, the line has not moved since opening at 3. I see its 3.5 some places, but still 3 on my book.
Got me handcuffed too, playing.
Mav (got it right), could you chip in on the reverse theory.
If a reverse movement changes direction, does that cancel its catergorization as a reverse.
With NO and IND no counter movement occurred.
Good day all, hope everyone is well! Had a good night last night 2-0 on my posted plays.
I'm locked in on PORTLAND +3.5: miami is 5-9 against the spread on the road and 0-5 against above .500 teams on the road, while on the other hand portland is 8-7-1 against the spread at home and 5-2 against above .500 teams at home.Plus the reverse line movement.
I'm also locked in on the PACERS -5: line has moved between 4.5 and 5 all day and from what I have found the public is on the knicks around 56%, so similar to yesterday with bucs and bulls, vegas seems to like the line where it is.Knicks are 7-9-1 against the spread on the road and 3-5 on road against over .500 teams.While Pacers are 10-6 at home against the spread and 6-1 against above .500 teams at home.
I'm also leaning on the under in sacramento for the same reasons as Legend00, who has a good write up.
Have a great night everyone!BOL
![]()
Good day all, hope everyone is well! Had a good night last night 2-0 on my posted plays.
I'm locked in on PORTLAND +3.5: miami is 5-9 against the spread on the road and 0-5 against above .500 teams on the road, while on the other hand portland is 8-7-1 against the spread at home and 5-2 against above .500 teams at home.Plus the reverse line movement.
I'm also locked in on the PACERS -5: line has moved between 4.5 and 5 all day and from what I have found the public is on the knicks around 56%, so similar to yesterday with bucs and bulls, vegas seems to like the line where it is.Knicks are 7-9-1 against the spread on the road and 3-5 on road against over .500 teams.While Pacers are 10-6 at home against the spread and 6-1 against above .500 teams at home.
I'm also leaning on the under in sacramento for the same reasons as Legend00, who has a good write up.
Have a great night everyone!BOL
![]()
I treat most of the sports handicapping questions as I treat the options. Long term or short term. In options trading expiry date is a very important factor that in order to have a good feel of it you have to look at the similar behavior of the stock/commodity/currency vs currency etc in a similar span of time with similar environmental and geopolitical events. Once you combine the strategy with a spot play - your chances depend on your being disciplined and precise in choice of expiry time when deciding to put or call. I see the same thing on Thursdays games. I don't remember when two of the public favorites won out of 3 games played on Thursdays. You're welcome to research and correct me
Mavin,
Based on this we might as well make the Knicks a play and should get 2 out of 3. I know this is a simple assessment, just thought I'd throw it out there.
I treat most of the sports handicapping questions as I treat the options. Long term or short term. In options trading expiry date is a very important factor that in order to have a good feel of it you have to look at the similar behavior of the stock/commodity/currency vs currency etc in a similar span of time with similar environmental and geopolitical events. Once you combine the strategy with a spot play - your chances depend on your being disciplined and precise in choice of expiry time when deciding to put or call. I see the same thing on Thursdays games. I don't remember when two of the public favorites won out of 3 games played on Thursdays. You're welcome to research and correct me
Mavin,
Based on this we might as well make the Knicks a play and should get 2 out of 3. I know this is a simple assessment, just thought I'd throw it out there.
Got me handcuffed too, playing.
Mav (got it right), could you chip in on the reverse theory.
If a reverse movement changes direction, does that cancel its catergorization as a reverse.
With NO and IND no counter movement occurred.
Got me handcuffed too, playing.
Mav (got it right), could you chip in on the reverse theory.
If a reverse movement changes direction, does that cancel its catergorization as a reverse.
With NO and IND no counter movement occurred.
Mav, took POR +3.5 last night when you did
( been following for a while now)
my book has it at +4.5 now
question: should I put another unit on +4.5, play ML, or leave it as is?
thanx for the thread, pleaser keep up all the hard work!!
![]()
CP74, I am in the exact same position as you. I am with SIA and I have Portland +3.5. As much as I would LOVE that extra point and be on +4.5 I am not changing by bet at all. Here's why:
The only possible outcome it would make any difference is if Portland loses by EXACTLY 4 points. That could happen, but I don't feel the chances of that happening are high enough to justify increasing my bet. If I felt that strongly I would have just bet more on the Blazers to begin with.
I totally understand how frustrating it is when the line moves in your favor AFTER your bet is in, and I know how tempting it can be to chase that extra point, but I'm just going to sit back with my 3.5 points and enjoy the show. But that's just me.
Go Blazers
Mav, took POR +3.5 last night when you did
( been following for a while now)
my book has it at +4.5 now
question: should I put another unit on +4.5, play ML, or leave it as is?
thanx for the thread, pleaser keep up all the hard work!!
![]()
CP74, I am in the exact same position as you. I am with SIA and I have Portland +3.5. As much as I would LOVE that extra point and be on +4.5 I am not changing by bet at all. Here's why:
The only possible outcome it would make any difference is if Portland loses by EXACTLY 4 points. That could happen, but I don't feel the chances of that happening are high enough to justify increasing my bet. If I felt that strongly I would have just bet more on the Blazers to begin with.
I totally understand how frustrating it is when the line moves in your favor AFTER your bet is in, and I know how tempting it can be to chase that extra point, but I'm just going to sit back with my 3.5 points and enjoy the show. But that's just me.
Go Blazers
Good day all, hope everyone is well! Had a good night last night 2-0 on my posted plays.
I'm locked in on PORTLAND +3.5: miami is 5-9 against the spread on the road and 0-5 against above .500 teams on the road, while on the other hand portland is 8-7-1 against the spread at home and 5-2 against above .500 teams at home.Plus the reverse line movement.
I'm also locked in on the PACERS -5: line has moved between 4.5 and 5 all day and from what I have found the public is on the knicks around 56%, so similar to yesterday with bucs and bulls, vegas seems to like the line where it is.Knicks are 7-9-1 against the spread on the road and 3-5 on road against over .500 teams.While Pacers are 10-6 at home against the spread and 6-1 against above .500 teams at home.
I'm also leaning on the under in sacramento for the same reasons as Legend00, who has a good write up.
Have a great night everyone!BOL
![]()
Good day all, hope everyone is well! Had a good night last night 2-0 on my posted plays.
I'm locked in on PORTLAND +3.5: miami is 5-9 against the spread on the road and 0-5 against above .500 teams on the road, while on the other hand portland is 8-7-1 against the spread at home and 5-2 against above .500 teams at home.Plus the reverse line movement.
I'm also locked in on the PACERS -5: line has moved between 4.5 and 5 all day and from what I have found the public is on the knicks around 56%, so similar to yesterday with bucs and bulls, vegas seems to like the line where it is.Knicks are 7-9-1 against the spread on the road and 3-5 on road against over .500 teams.While Pacers are 10-6 at home against the spread and 6-1 against above .500 teams at home.
I'm also leaning on the under in sacramento for the same reasons as Legend00, who has a good write up.
Have a great night everyone!BOL
![]()
Thank, Mav !!................Stop by Satriale's any time!.........![]()
Thank, Mav !!................Stop by Satriale's any time!.........![]()
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 461,076
- Tuesday 10/13/2026 705
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 274,303
- PART DEUX 259
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,325
- NFL LOCKED IN! 107,025
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 41,235
- the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 21,262
- Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 32,873
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 21,727
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
