Posted:
#3351
Like 5 points in the last 5 minutes of the zona game...
1st half, 2nd half OVER UNDER theory - all tourney long
Posted:
#3355
decent night for me
79293152
Jan 29 06:10 PM
NBA STRAIGHT BET
[703] OKC THUNDER +7-170 (B+3)
34 / 20
20 WIN
WIN 01/29/2014 04:37 AM
INTERNET / -1 Ticket #: 79320760
Jan 29 08:05 PM
Jan 29 08:40 PM
NBA
NBA 2T TEAS 6, 6½, 7 FB 4, 4½, 5 BK
[715] CHA BOBCATS +12½-110 (B+5)
[717] CHI BULLS +12½-110 (B+5)
28 / 21
21 WIN
WIN
WIN 01/29/2014
79293152
Jan 29 06:10 PM
NBA STRAIGHT BET
[703] OKC THUNDER +7-170 (B+3)
34 / 20
20 WIN
WIN 01/29/2014 04:37 AM
INTERNET / -1 Ticket #: 79320760
Jan 29 08:05 PM
Jan 29 08:40 PM
NBA
NBA 2T TEAS 6, 6½, 7 FB 4, 4½, 5 BK
[715] CHA BOBCATS +12½-110 (B+5)
[717] CHI BULLS +12½-110 (B+5)
28 / 21
21 WIN
WIN
WIN 01/29/2014
Posted:
#3358
So, here is some corollary thinking on NCAAB 2nd half under betting theory. Stumbled on this bet during the Tourney 2 years ago courtesy of a Covers poster Sensei Kreese. We made a lot of money betting 2H Under on select games. As far as I know, he never revealed the formula or theory.
Actually had a 2-way ML parlay in the final of Butler 1H, UConn 2H for $100 that paid $1100 as a result of this approach.
Here's my interpretation of what's at work.
Everyone who makes it to the Tourney can shoot the rock. The distinguishing feature of top teams is that they can also play D. But D takes a lot of energy. So, in order to conserve energy, top teams wait until 2H to lock the other team down.
So, there was no play in 1H, but based on first-half result, we bet 2H Under.
Seems as though we were up something like 30-40 net bets by the end of the tourney. We also used it in the NIT with similar results.
The other side of this corollary is that Tourney games will favor the underdog in 1H, b/c the fave will be waiting for 2H to lock down.
Will be watching your progress as the Conference tourneys and The Tourney approach.
Good luck...
Posted:
#3359
Quote Originally Posted by JamezD_HI:
So, here is some corollary thinking on NCAAB 2nd half under betting theory. Stumbled on this bet during the Tourney 2 years ago courtesy of a Covers poster Sensei Kreese. We made a lot of money betting 2H Under on select games. As far as I know, he never revealed the formula or theory.
So, here is some corollary thinking on NCAAB 2nd half under betting theory. Stumbled on this bet during the Tourney 2 years ago courtesy of a Covers poster Sensei Kreese. We made a lot of money betting 2H Under on select games. As far as I know, he never revealed the formula or theory.
Actually had a 2-way ML parlay in the final of Butler 1H, UConn 2H for $100 that paid $1100 as a result of this approach.
Here's my interpretation of what's at work.
Everyone who makes it to the Tourney can shoot the rock. The distinguishing feature of top teams is that they can also play D. But D takes a lot of energy. So, in order to conserve energy, top teams wait until 2H to lock the other team down.
So, there was no play in 1H, but based on first-half result, we bet 2H Under.
Seems as though we were up something like 30-40 net bets by the end of the tourney. We also used it in the NIT with similar results.
The other side of this corollary is that Tourney games will favor the underdog in 1H, b/c the fave will be waiting for 2H to lock down.
Will be watching your progress as the Conference tourneys and The Tourney approach.
Good luck...
Interesting. Just sent you a friend request 
Posted:
#3360
YEPPER!!!!....Remember Sensei K. well.....He didn't play every under in the second half, but had a system that recognized WHEN to do it....Guys were "frothing at the mouths" waiting for sometimes, his last second picks, if any....In short, I paid nearly total cash for a new car on him....Seen his name here and there but don't know what happened to him and/or system....INCREDIBLE RUN!.....Good luck guys!
Hot Forum Topics
