NHL System - Algorithmic

Win some, lose some, the nature of the beast.

Not a mistake.

This discrepancy will occur sometimes but not often.

The reason for this is that although statistics related to scoring indicate a higher score for Team A trends indicate a victory for Team B.

The specific trend involved is performance in past 10.

For example, if LA scores 5 goals a game and OTT scores 4.5 goals a game but LA is 2-8 in its past 10 and OTT is 9-1 a higher goal total would be indicated for LA but a win would be indicated for OTT.

This can happen but it is relatively rare. In these cases the accurate prediction is the one that states Win % not estimated score.

I'm thankful that your second post here is on my thread. 

I'm also thankful for your encouragement. I hope I bring you great winnings. 

The short answer to your question is no.

The long answer to your question is that due to a variety of complications I have not been recording overall record. I do not expect users to bet the system in its entirety blindly each night. There are also too many logistics I would have to track. I.E. its record on games with a 51-55% confidence interval as opposed to 65-70%.

I personally don't have the time to track it.

In addition, I myself don't bet each play every night. I have a very strategic system as to how I bet. I use the results of the system as a guideline. I then look for "proofs" if you will, to give me reasons to bet the systems results. For example, if the system says NJD @ EDM is supposed to hit 5.94 goals (over 5.5) I would look at trend analysis. How many of each of their games have gone over recently? How often have they gone over against each other? Are the goalies in net starting goaltenders or backups? If the trends agree with the system you can guarantee that I will bet on it.

May I add, tracking is based on the value of a WIN, was it a PL WIN? a RPL WIN? a home dog? a road dog? was the favorite ML WIN above or below -150, -120? look, and react to a stable trend that contains the element connecting value to a win, home wins -vs- road wins, goalie WINS, the options are numerous, and brings excessive value to the forefront, I would recommend that those that are interested in Pandas system, create a spreadsheet to personalize their own individual wagering form, keep in mind this system is a 'tool' with accurate projections, a spreadsheet incorporates, and attaches the' tool' to a handicap of value, (PL, RPL)

"If the trends agree with the system, you can guarantee that I will bet on it"  absolutely...well said Panda,