No problem - great night!
I played NAS/PHO over 5.5 though because we were in game two of an over chase for each team. NAS previously lost the first game of its over chase against DAL and PHO also previously lost the first game of their over chase against DAL.
How come you had under? And how were the tweaked picks determined? I wish I would have known under was the play because I put the over in before my flight and when I landed I saw it didn't hit and everyone here had under as the play lol.
.
.I just thought that since both NAS and PHO played an over team (DAL) in the first game of their chase and we played over in those games, that the rest of their chase would be for the over - regardless of who they played. Otherwise it isn't much of a chase if we switch from over to under in the middle of the string - then it becomes more based on capping than using a chase system.
I will post the plays for today early that I calculate to be the plays and then hopefully everyone puts their two cents in and we can lock these plays in kind of early.
I just thought that since both NAS and PHO played an over team (DAL) in the first game of their chase and we played over in those games, that the rest of their chase would be for the over - regardless of who they played. Otherwise it isn't much of a chase if we switch from over to under in the middle of the string - then it becomes more based on capping than using a chase system.
.I gotcha, I was under the impression that we were simply chasing the under for a particular team following their OT game and if that team happened to be an "over team" or happened to play an "over team" in the first game of their chase then the chase was for the over.
I guess in reality what we're doing is chasing the under for a particular team following their OT game unless that team happens to be an "over team" or unless an under team plays an "over team" at some point on the chase, in which case we would play over, but we wouldn't chase that over, we would revert back to the under in their chase if they played a normal team the next game (i.e. NAS played DAL in game 1 of NAS chase, we took over bec DAL is an over team, in game 2 of NAS chase they played PHO who is not an over team, so we reverted back to the under in that chase).
Correct?
I had mentioned this scenario in an earlier post and thought based on responses that the chase would have stayed over, but I was wrong. I apologize if anyone played the over in the NAS/PHO game last night based on my post and lost. There will be many more winners to come!
I agree with these plays Expert
I just have two questions:
1) Devils are on an under chase, we always play over when line is 5 has nothing to do with chase, do we resume devils chase in their next game as if this one didnt exist?
2) Isles (over team) playing Minn (under team), each in their first game of chase. We play over bec Isles are over team, now say it goes under and we lose, in Isles next game we chase over because their an over team, but in Minn next game is your theory that if they play a "non-over team", we would play under in Minn game on their chase?
I just have two questions:
1) Devils are on an under chase, we always play over when line is 5
has nothing to do with chase, do we resume devils chase in their next
game as if this one didnt exist? yes i believe the next devils game is Sunday, December 21 against Philadelphia, which means it would be a play as over ( Philadelphia Flyers) so if that game goes under we still chase New Jersey for the next game even if it went into overtime we just overide NJ going onto the next round hope this explains
2) Isles (over team) playing Minn (under team), each in their first game of chase. We play over bec Isles are over team, now say it goes under and we lose, in Isles next game we chase over because their an over team, but in Minn next game is your theory that if they play a "non-over team", we would play under in Minn game on their chase? the only way Minnesota would be chased as if they went to over time which they have not yet. But beings they are playing NY Islanders they fit the over category. Even if it goes under we still chase NY Islanders for the next game which will be over ( over always takes presedence) there is your 2 answers hope this clarifies your questions
Cheers!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry I messed that up:
I just have two questions: Here are your answers
1) Devils are on an under chase, we always play over when line is 5
has nothing to do with chase, do we resume devils chase in their next
game as if this one didnt exist? yes
i believe the next devils game is Sunday, December 21 against
Philadelphia, which means it would be a play as over ( Philadelphia
Flyers) so if that game goes under we still chase New Jersey for the
next game even if it went into overtime we just overide NJ going onto
the next round hope this explains
2) Isles (over team) playing Minn (under team), each in their first game of chase. We play over bec Isles are over team, now say it goes under and we lose, in Isles next game we chase over because their an over team, but in Minn next game is your theory that if they play a "non-over team", we would play under in Minn game on their chase? the only way Minnesota would be chased as if they went to over time which they have not yet. But beings they are playing NY Islanders they fit the over category. Even if it goes under we still chase NY Islanders for the next game which will be over ( over always takes presedence) there is your 2 answers hope this clarifies your questions
Cheers!!!!!!!!!!
Established in 1995,
Got wrapped up in the totals and forgot to take carolina tonight...saw on espn this am that they won something like 14 in a row against them? Keep up the good work guys I'm payin for christmas by blindly tailing you guys!
Hot Forum Topics
