
I would have not counted the over 5 as a system loss and stuck with NJ however since they won I am treating that chase as over since I profited off of it. But I see Experts point - that we treat those over 5 games outside the system totally.
I would have not counted the over 5 as a system loss and stuck with NJ however since they won I am treating that chase as over since I profited off of it. But I see Experts point - that we treat those over 5 games outside the system totally.
We might need an asterisk if they burn the system. Because I for one consider the devils going over 5 the other day as winning that chase since I had them as a chase play and didnt play them tonight. I will play them in their next game as a new chase since they went to OT tonight. I am assuming there will be a mix of people around here who went either way and chased/not chased NJ.
For tomorrow the only game I am seeing is:
PIT/BUF under 6 (first game of buffalo chase)
We might need an asterisk if they burn the system. Because I for one consider the devils going over 5 the other day as winning that chase since I had them as a chase play and didnt play them tonight. I will play them in their next game as a new chase since they went to OT tonight. I am assuming there will be a mix of people around here who went either way and chased/not chased NJ.
For tomorrow the only game I am seeing is:
PIT/BUF under 6 (first game of buffalo chase)
I was thinking doesn't it make more sense that a team with a large differential be more likely to go under than over? If a team scores a lot more goals than they give up for example the games would be more one sided and conducive to the under. Usually it takes two teams to be involved in scoring to hit the over.
I was thinking doesn't it make more sense that a team with a large differential be more likely to go under than over? If a team scores a lot more goals than they give up for example the games would be more one sided and conducive to the under. Usually it takes two teams to be involved in scoring to hit the over.
I was thinking doesn't it make more sense that a team with a large differential be more likely to go under than over? If a team scores a lot more goals than they give up for example the games would be more one sided and conducive to the under. Usually it takes two teams to be involved in scoring to hit the over.
I was thinking doesn't it make more sense that a team with a large differential be more likely to go under than over? If a team scores a lot more goals than they give up for example the games would be more one sided and conducive to the under. Usually it takes two teams to be involved in scoring to hit the over.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.