Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by doubledime:
Are you playing these ML or PL?
Both are +1.5 PL
0
NHL Road chase
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
147 total bets
98 "A" wins
36 "B" wins
9 "C" wins
4 losses
2 of the 4 losses would have been filtered out, if you avoided betting AGAINST the top 3 RPI rated teams, and ON the worst 3 RPI teams
That filter would have also cut some winning series plays. But overall, if you Labourchere it, you'll recover any losses and turn a substantial profit
nice record A-B.. A question do you know how many games were won ML by a dog team last year using your syst. i know you are using PL when is a dog the road team, thanks and keep it up amigo
0
Posted:
#29
Many more losses if you just take the ML. I know what you're getting at: the juice is way higher with the PL than the ML. In theory, you'll be saving money by just laying the ML instead.
That's incorrect though, because this system fails miserably that way. You'll end up with a record under .500 for the year. I started checking last years stats and quickly stopped, since almost every series I looked into was a loss. Then +1.5 helps quite a bit for the dogs. Already 1 win this year with it.
0
Posted:
#33
Tampa Bay 
New Labby line:
x-x-25-x
25-25-25-43-55-70
25-25-25-25-79-70
2 more (A) bets coming for Thursday 10/14, with Carolina and St. Louis
Quick question if anyone has time to answer:
My current Labby line for the upcoming A bets is x-x-25-x. What would my "to win" bets be? 25? Or start the line over at 25-25-25-25 ?
Thanks 
0
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
Tampa Bay
New Labby line:
x-x-25-x
25-25-25-43-55-70
25-25-25-25-79-70
2 more (A) bets coming for Thursday 10/14, with Carolina and St. Louis
Quick question if anyone has time to answer:
My current Labby line for the upcoming A bets is x-x-25-x. What would my "to win" bets be? 25? Or start the line over at 25-25-25-25 ?
Thanks
I'd adjust your lines you don't want one of your lines to get out of wack...
On my C. bets I don't try to make money I try and recover..
My C would look like this 79-70
I actually do two A lines for those days when you get 4 or 5 games it's eaiser to manage. I'll give you an example with what you have up there.
A= 25-25-25-25-60
A= 25-25-25-60
B= 25-25-25-43-55
C= 75-74 On the C only bet one of these. just trying to get your money back.
On A and B bets for the day I always Divide the back in labby so I get equal bets for the day so I'm not more money on one or the other. if I have two A's and 2 B's for the day it would like this.
A= 25-25-25-25-55
A=25-25-25-55
B= 25-25-25-55-55 So you'd bet 80 to win on each game.
0
Posted:
#36
Another modification I do is this:
The whole idea of clearing a line is to make 4 units. (Your units are 5...so 5-5-5-5 is your starting line).
Therefore, if there are two bets on one day, and your line looks like this:
5-5-5-5-7.5
I bet 7.5+5 = 12.5 (italics) on the first game and 5+5 = 10 (bold) on the second one. No need to bet 12.5 on both, as when you clear the line, you'll have made more than 4 units (but also at the expense of higher risk)
The whole idea of clearing a line is to make 4 units. (Your units are 5...so 5-5-5-5 is your starting line).
Therefore, if there are two bets on one day, and your line looks like this:
5-5-5-5-7.5
I bet 7.5+5 = 12.5 (italics) on the first game and 5+5 = 10 (bold) on the second one. No need to bet 12.5 on both, as when you clear the line, you'll have made more than 4 units (but also at the expense of higher risk)
0
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by Jokeheads:
To play the C bet of this system, I am just going to roll the C bets into the B labby line. I think that will give maximum recovery rate (and if C bets are lost, ample time to properly recover that loss as well)
To play the C bet of this system, I am just going to roll the C bets into the B labby line. I think that will give maximum recovery rate (and if C bets are lost, ample time to properly recover that loss as well)
I think thats another good way to go!!
I like to consider a labby of 5.5.5.5 has just 2 Units since your bet is $10 for the game that being 1 unit..
0
Posted:
#40
2 more (A) winners tonight (thanks to the Puck Line!!!)
(A) Carolina
(A) St Louis
We cleared our first Labby line with those winners, and the new line looks like this:
25-25-25-25 (reset)
25-25-25-43-55-70
25-25-25-25-79-70
We'll have a (C) bet on Atlanta for Friday 10/15 @ Anaheim. The (C) bet will be "to win" $95 (70+25 on line C)
I'm going to stick to this more agressive Labby line for now, and continue to try and profit from the C line as well
0
Posted:
#42
Yeah this is the modified JM system (I think JM calls it NHL v2.0) , which is essentially the same exact thing, except the cross-conferance doesnt matter.
The results are the same: higher percentage of wins for the road teams, as long as you follow the filters precisely
I'm even thinking about skipping the C bet on Atlanta tonight. Originally, I said I would just follow the A & B bets until all the teams have had a road-series under their belt. Not sure yet. Although I really think Anaheim blows.
0
Posted:
#43
We would have picked up a (C) win last night, with the Thrashers +1.5 over the Ducks. I'm skipping the (C) bets until the second road series for each team, but hopefully someone snagged the cash
We'll have another (A) bet tonight on Ottawa PL -320
Juice sucks on this one, but the system works
Current Labby line:
25-25-25-25 (reset)
25-25-25-43-55-70
25-25-25-25-79-70
Ottawa (A) bet will be $160 to win $50 (25+25)
0
Posted:
#46
I'm only skipping the "C" bet for each teams first road trip. Once every team has a road trip under their belt, I'll start wagering on the "C" games for the second trip and on.
I feel that by doing it like that, we'll have a better understand of who sucks on the road (judging by their Road Record), and if we should avoid that series, or play on it.
0
Hot Forum Topics
