I never knew that about the order from smallest to biggest. I always thought it should be in the order that you lose them in.
As far as the 2 bets being for the same amount: we actually discussed a little in this thread about doing it both ways. It made a little more sense to try and split the bets up on the line, to try and recover more losses per bet, instead of just 1. Is there a reason specific to why they should all be the same?
If you have two bets (lets take yestredays example - to win 25+161=186) and you win them both you clear 186 X 2 from your lines. I doesn't matter which lines you cross (normally you cross your biggest lines to reduse your bets = risk). So if nyi and nash both have won I would cross 25 and 161 + 25 and 99 and some of the 88. I hope its clear what i mean. Its been a while since i have written something in english.
In your case - yesterday you lost you big wager and won your small wager. You always have to make the same wagers as you never know what will happen in the game.
Just read again that PSIC stuff about labby that was posted.
but the juice would be too much for me..better to be in profit than loss though...keep it up,you are doing better than allot, cos i think more than half the crappers in nhl forum are down...lol
Hot Forum Topics
