Buster, how many years did the Royals lose 100 games with 17 game losing streak? Just one in 2005 and it was a 19 game losing streak. July 28- August 19. They lost 100 games 4 times since becoming the the KC Royals in 1969.
Have a great day!
0
Buster, how many years did the Royals lose 100 games with 17 game losing streak? Just one in 2005 and it was a 19 game losing streak. July 28- August 19. They lost 100 games 4 times since becoming the the KC Royals in 1969.
The main goal here is not to bet on dogs blindly. Choosing them fitting to the criteria esp before the all star break generated profit.
While I see why people would want to play dogs I think since return isn't that high especially home dogs @+119.7 I think energies should be focused on RL favorites or even smaller fav's. Only about 28-30% of games are home dogs. If you only play +140 HD to try and get better return it hit 53-108 last year for a loss of 25.34 units. Removing those from the equation would make your return even less attractive probably less than +110. Just thinking out loud.
0
Quote Originally Posted by orhane:
The main goal here is not to bet on dogs blindly. Choosing them fitting to the criteria esp before the all star break generated profit.
While I see why people would want to play dogs I think since return isn't that high especially home dogs @+119.7 I think energies should be focused on RL favorites or even smaller fav's. Only about 28-30% of games are home dogs. If you only play +140 HD to try and get better return it hit 53-108 last year for a loss of 25.34 units. Removing those from the equation would make your return even less attractive probably less than +110. Just thinking out loud.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sportsdatabase/sfbZ7RMMM5g i tried to sdql these systems. seems like onl the low scoring dogs seem to work
good commentary, and yes, the stats speak for theirselve. "low scoring scoring (meaning value) dogs seem to work" however, it doesn't stop their, you take the dog to the next level, the (reverse) RL which as you are more than aware of, is the highest valued wager when betting MLB, (you've already capped a dog win, next step is to activate it on the [-1.5] RRL, much like taking an over valued favorite -165 plus, on the [-1.5] RL bringing value to the favorite. Your 'dog' research should lean in the direction of the (reverse) RL:
take note, a stat easily attainable; "What % of 'dogs' won by 2 runs or more in the 2013 MLB season" attach a formulated system to these results, connect them to the top 4 teams, and you have a foundation by which to work from (spreadsheet) for the upcoming season. may you prosper always, have fun, thats what handicapping sports is all about; making money, and having fun on the way to your quest.....later
0
Quote Originally Posted by orhane:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sportsdatabase/sfbZ7RMMM5g i tried to sdql these systems. seems like onl the low scoring dogs seem to work
good commentary, and yes, the stats speak for theirselve. "low scoring scoring (meaning value) dogs seem to work" however, it doesn't stop their, you take the dog to the next level, the (reverse) RL which as you are more than aware of, is the highest valued wager when betting MLB, (you've already capped a dog win, next step is to activate it on the [-1.5] RRL, much like taking an over valued favorite -165 plus, on the [-1.5] RL bringing value to the favorite. Your 'dog' research should lean in the direction of the (reverse) RL:
take note, a stat easily attainable; "What % of 'dogs' won by 2 runs or more in the 2013 MLB season" attach a formulated system to these results, connect them to the top 4 teams, and you have a foundation by which to work from (spreadsheet) for the upcoming season. may you prosper always, have fun, thats what handicapping sports is all about; making money, and having fun on the way to your quest.....later
low scoring dog means that this team has won it's previous game with scoring 3 runs or less. coming from a solid defensive effort must be a big boost when going into the next game.
0
low scoring dog means that this team has won it's previous game with scoring 3 runs or less. coming from a solid defensive effort must be a big boost when going into the next game.
low scoring dog means that this team has won it's previous game with scoring 3 runs or less. coming from a solid defensive effort must be a big boost when going into the next game.
thanks for this clarification!
0
Quote Originally Posted by orhane:
low scoring dog means that this team has won it's previous game with scoring 3 runs or less. coming from a solid defensive effort must be a big boost when going into the next game.
yea... 10 years is definitely a very good sample size without doubt!!!
I have no idea what kind of time it would take... and if it is a lot, don't worry about it, but by any chance do you have a year by year breakdown, If so i'd love to see it...
Thanks in advance... Brian
0
yea... 10 years is definitely a very good sample size without doubt!!!
I have no idea what kind of time it would take... and if it is a lot, don't worry about it, but by any chance do you have a year by year breakdown, If so i'd love to see it...
https://sportsdatabase.com/mlb/query?sdql=D+and+p%3AD+and+p%3AW+and+p%3Aruns%3C%3D3+and+season&submit=S+D+Q+L+! year by year breakdown. you are correct
0
https://sportsdatabase.com/mlb/query?sdql=D+and+p%3AD+and+p%3AW+and+p%3Aruns%3C%3D3+and+season&submit=S+D+Q+L+! year by year breakdown. you are correct
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
