MLB system releases...
I have a doubt, Rich Hill (Baltimore Pitcher) has only pitched to 3 toronto players (Barajas, Overbay and Rolen), how can you decide UNDER? just because both pitchers have less than 3
a combination of many concepts fits the Under, one being Halladay, two, Hill is a lefty, three, TOR is ice cold in run production. four, 3 players is enough to get a 33% 'read' BR/RC gives a 8.34 TOTAL .. but as you know, this is baseball, anything can go into regression. If you have 'doubt' I recommend you play the OVER, it's that simple. best regards SN![]()
I have a doubt, Rich Hill (Baltimore Pitcher) has only pitched to 3 toronto players (Barajas, Overbay and Rolen), how can you decide UNDER? just because both pitchers have less than 3
a combination of many concepts fits the Under, one being Halladay, two, Hill is a lefty, three, TOR is ice cold in run production. four, 3 players is enough to get a 33% 'read' BR/RC gives a 8.34 TOTAL .. but as you know, this is baseball, anything can go into regression. If you have 'doubt' I recommend you play the OVER, it's that simple. best regards SN![]()
Matsuzaka BR= 2.89
Slowey BR= 3.19
So this numbers would tell us to go OVER and Boston Wins, right?
are your results similar to mine?
Matsuzaka BR= 2.89
Slowey BR= 3.19
So this numbers would tell us to go OVER and Boston Wins, right?
are your results similar to mine?
My sports book has 9.5 o/u in Bos/Min game and my results are Boston 5.47 and Min 4.67 total 10.13 so I would go over,
Matsuzaka BR= 2.89
Slowey BR= 3.19
So this numbers would tell us to go OVER and Boston Wins, right?
are your results similar to mine?
yes they are, good work![]()
My sports book has 9.5 o/u in Bos/Min game and my results are Boston 5.47 and Min 4.67 total 10.13 so I would go over,
Matsuzaka BR= 2.89
Slowey BR= 3.19
So this numbers would tell us to go OVER and Boston Wins, right?
are your results similar to mine?
yes they are, good work![]()
you average them out, to get a mean read.....
you average them out, to get a mean read.....
Early card: If I dont change I will stick with plays and still waiting on one line which Im sure I will play either way. BOL
Early card: If I dont change I will stick with plays and still waiting on one line which Im sure I will play either way. BOL
Boston +125
Bos/min Over 9.5 +100
Florida +170
Fla/Phi Under 10 -120
Angels -200
LAA/CHW under 9 -120
Let's see if I understood
Boston +125
Bos/min Over 9.5 +100
Florida +170
Fla/Phi Under 10 -120
Angels -200
LAA/CHW under 9 -120
Let's see if I understood
Wal - you are correct with your analysis, Hill has no data to make a good play with that game and you were better to layoff. I played it cause of what he has been doing but still not too strong of a play. I took a chance on more than anything.
Hope you bet it HeaVin.....12-7 at the end of the 5th![]()
would make you 2-2 on the night...that Jay game was ![]()
Have you guys tried the spreadsheet posted by uzovka77??
I've been using it but 1 of the formula is missing HR's so it was screwing up my numbers......I like the spreadsheet idea for speed and not to make mistakes when making calculations....hope it gets perfected![]()
just to let you know guys I'm still following your plays and doing my own calculations when I have time...post a few of my numbers next week and see what happens.![]()
Wal - you are correct with your analysis, Hill has no data to make a good play with that game and you were better to layoff. I played it cause of what he has been doing but still not too strong of a play. I took a chance on more than anything.
Hope you bet it HeaVin.....12-7 at the end of the 5th![]()
would make you 2-2 on the night...that Jay game was ![]()
Have you guys tried the spreadsheet posted by uzovka77??
I've been using it but 1 of the formula is missing HR's so it was screwing up my numbers......I like the spreadsheet idea for speed and not to make mistakes when making calculations....hope it gets perfected![]()
just to let you know guys I'm still following your plays and doing my own calculations when I have time...post a few of my numbers next week and see what happens.![]()
Today there are a lot of rookies pitching, so I only analyzed 3 games (I'm late for the early games)
Boston +125
Bos/min Over 9.5 +100
Florida +170
Fla/Phi Under 10 -120
Angels -200
LAA/CHW under 9 -120
Let's see if I understood
66.66% very good
Today there are a lot of rookies pitching, so I only analyzed 3 games (I'm late for the early games)
Boston +125
Bos/min Over 9.5 +100
Florida +170
Fla/Phi Under 10 -120
Angels -200
LAA/CHW under 9 -120
Let's see if I understood
66.66% very good
Hope you bet it HeaVin.....12-7 at the end of the 5th![]()
would make you 2-2 on the night...that Jay game was ![]()
Have you guys tried the spreadsheet posted by uzovka77??
I've been using it but 1 of the formula is missing HR's so it was screwing up my numbers......I like the spreadsheet idea for speed and not to make mistakes when making calculations....hope it gets perfected![]()
just to let you know guys I'm still following your plays and doing my own calculations when I have time...post a few of my numbers next week and see what happens.![]()
I apologize. I know, that it wasn't perfect and I personally found it and corrected. It was just for you guys to start calculate faster and easier. Everybody, who understand Excel, can easily fine it.
Anyway, its just the tool how to be more effective. I'm not doing very well, because I think I cant use the right stats and still getting bigger numbers :(
I'm starting be little bit frustrated
Hope you bet it HeaVin.....12-7 at the end of the 5th![]()
would make you 2-2 on the night...that Jay game was ![]()
Have you guys tried the spreadsheet posted by uzovka77??
I've been using it but 1 of the formula is missing HR's so it was screwing up my numbers......I like the spreadsheet idea for speed and not to make mistakes when making calculations....hope it gets perfected![]()
just to let you know guys I'm still following your plays and doing my own calculations when I have time...post a few of my numbers next week and see what happens.![]()
I apologize. I know, that it wasn't perfect and I personally found it and corrected. It was just for you guys to start calculate faster and easier. Everybody, who understand Excel, can easily fine it.
Anyway, its just the tool how to be more effective. I'm not doing very well, because I think I cant use the right stats and still getting bigger numbers :(
I'm starting be little bit frustrated
Boston +125
Bos/min Over 9.5 +100
Florida +170.....................![]()
Fla/Phi Under 10 -120
Angels -200
LAA/CHW under 9 -120
"Let's see if I understood"
Yes amigo, you definately 'understand' 4-2 with a +170 Dog hit,(Marlins) Please continue.....your application, BR/RC is coincidal..
Boston +125
Bos/min Over 9.5 +100
Florida +170.....................![]()
Fla/Phi Under 10 -120
Angels -200
LAA/CHW under 9 -120
"Let's see if I understood"
Yes amigo, you definately 'understand' 4-2 with a +170 Dog hit,(Marlins) Please continue.....your application, BR/RC is coincidal..
Vincent I also have AZ/ATL over as my only solid play-but now it is down to 7.5. Even Better.
Vincent I also have AZ/ATL over as my only solid play-but now it is down to 7.5. Even Better.
Atl/Az OVER 7.5 -120
Atl/Az -1.5 RL +170
Atl/Az OVER 7.5 -120
Atl/Az -1.5 RL +170
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
