Posted:
#76
Is the Florida play tonight an official play?
0
John Morrison Thread
Posted:
#77
Quote Originally Posted by SRTZEE:
I think you need to read the systems you are betting on to find out JM's importance of relying on the rpi.
Believe it or not, I have read, and I do understand the system. That's why I have suffered no series losses to date. Maybe there's one coming up. Who knows?
I do not over emphasize the rpi filter. The way it has been discussed it seems like people are using it as the primary criteria for betting--which it is not. It is only a filter. The system doesn't say, "Hey just look at rpi and bet on those teams with the higher rpi to win."
The system looks for teams that have been swept as the primary criteria to bet on. Then, once that condition has been met, you look at rpi. If the rpi is right, place the bet.
But since you understand the system, then you already know that. I am the one that's getting ready to figure it out. Thanks for the tip.
0
Posted:
#78
There has been a lot of discussion over the rpi filter. Since the difference is greater than .01 people will say, if Fla loses the series, then JM will say that it was not an official bet. If Fla wins JM will chalk it up as a system win.
Here's the bottom line. You play your money and you take your chances. The rpi was closes enough for me to place the bet. I don't blame JM for any actions I chose to take. If I lose, my bank account goes down. If I win my bank account goes up. JM isn't responsible, but I like the hell out of his system.
Here's the bottom line. You play your money and you take your chances. The rpi was closes enough for me to place the bet. I don't blame JM for any actions I chose to take. If I lose, my bank account goes down. If I win my bank account goes up. JM isn't responsible, but I like the hell out of his system.
0
Posted:
#80
Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Kent:
There has been a lot of discussion over the rpi filter. Since the difference is greater than .01 people will say, if Fla loses the series, then JM will say that it was not an official bet. If Fla wins JM will chalk it up as a system win.
Here's the bottom line. You play your money and you take your chances. The rpi was closes enough for me to place the bet. I don't blame JM for any actions I chose to take. If I lose, my bank account goes down. If I win my bank account goes up. JM isn't responsible, but I like the hell out of his system.
There has been a lot of discussion over the rpi filter. Since the difference is greater than .01 people will say, if Fla loses the series, then JM will say that it was not an official bet. If Fla wins JM will chalk it up as a system win.
Here's the bottom line. You play your money and you take your chances. The rpi was closes enough for me to place the bet. I don't blame JM for any actions I chose to take. If I lose, my bank account goes down. If I win my bank account goes up. JM isn't responsible, but I like the hell out of his system.
This is the reason I left the other thread. Very well said Mr.Kent. John Morison isn't even a real person. He is Santa Claus,the tooth Ferry, and Bigfoot. Blaming JM is like blaming the President for all of your problems. It is your money, bet it the way you want. If you want to stick to the .01 stick to it. Tan is a marketer who is just looking out for himself.
0
Posted:
#81
So, Kong, are you takin' FLA tonight? I got 1/2 my usual amount to win tonight. I think FLA stinks, but getting 1.5 runs should help their cause in one of the 3 games.
And in hindsight, my NYY -2.5 RL last night woulda been icing on the cake. Still did well in the end. Joba Lemonass had me worried big in the 1st 3 innings bigtime. That guy stinks. And a big thanks to your boy Smoltz for serving up the runs for us to cash in.
0
Posted:
#85
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:
Welcome DarkKnight.
What systems do you follow?
I mainly play on traps and runlines. I look at a pitching matchup and see if they should in fact cover the runline. If not and something looks fishy then it usually is.
Example my indexes show the Cubs game not getting over 5 runs, but it opened at 9. So I see this one going over.
I am looking to find a system to follow so I do not have to research and it is posted already in here very early. I am changing shifts and need help badly getting plays early. I like this Morrison system.
0
Posted:
#86
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
This is the reason I left the other thread. Very well said Mr.Kent. John Morison isn't even a real person. He is Santa Claus,the tooth Ferry, and Bigfoot. Blaming JM is like blaming the President for all of your problems. It is your money, bet it the way you want. If you want to stick to the .01 stick to it. Tan is a marketer who is just looking out for himself.
Very well said..............
Ive called him SANTA before
for all of the wonderful gifts he brings me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Im sending a letter right now to the NORTH POLE and asking for the 2009 NFL & NHL SYSTEMS
0
Posted:
#88
I knew about his sweep system 3 years ago and never played it cause I did not have time to research it. To date right now I would have been in good shape but instead I followed totals and runlines and kept myself in the game but I want to play limited games and have a greater chance of winning that numerous games and busting my chops each week.
I heard alot of bad stuff about the system so I do not want to buy it but then again I need to be able to get some knowledge of how the system works so I can play my games early. I keep checking this thread......... so which is the legitimate plays for tonight that he has released.
0
Posted:
#89
There are no official plays tonight.
There is a WNBA play tomorrow.
Search the following and you will get the instructions:
John Morrison MLB, NBA, and WNBA
Forget paying for them, you can find them free and will know when the plays come up based on the schedules.
In fact, under this forum (systems and strategies) you will find all of these or links within the discussions about the add-ons to the base systems.
0
Posted:
#91
DarkKnight, it is not clear in the WNBA thread, but you are supposed to buy 3 points on the team you are betting on.
If game 1 (A game) loses, you need to bet enough on the second game (B game) to make up your loss and get profit. Same thing for game 3 (C game) if game 2 loses.
As with all chase systems, managing your money is key. If you lose the C game, the chase is done for that series and you just lost a ton of money. Some people don bet the C game at all, or they bet less and try to make it up on another series to avoid a big loss.
0
Posted:
#92
You guys are awesome as hell. I actually used this system in NBA and made tons until he started sending out all the filters etc...
Just stay away from bad teams which used to be Sacramento in NBA cause they used to kill me. And take 3 game road trip.
So how does his NFL and NCAAF work?
I don not think anyone uses a college system cause I do not see many of them around. Does JM have a college system?
If not just lay 2 units on 3 of the best and 1 unit on the next 3 best teams in the top 25 and watch the profits work. This system worked for 3 years and then busted me open.
I will continue to use it until someone exposes a good one.
Just hate to see college football going on and not play it. LOL
0
Posted:
#93
No NCAA.
He just released a new NFL today. Wait a couple of weeks and we should be able to find it posted here or on other websites, which will then be posted here.
He also has NHL, which has a thread here on the systems and strategies forum. Kong Killer is working on tweaking it for the upcoming season.
0
Posted:
#95
Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Kent:
Believe it or not, I have read, and I do understand the system. That's why I have suffered no series losses to date. Maybe there's one coming up. Who knows?
I do not over emphasize the rpi filter. The way it has been discussed it seems like people are using it as the primary criteria for betting--which it is not. It is only a filter. The system doesn't say, "Hey just look at rpi and bet on those teams with the higher rpi to win."
The system looks for teams that have been swept as the primary criteria to bet on. Then, once that condition has been met, you look at rpi. If the rpi is right, place the bet.
But since you understand the system, then you already know that. I am the one that's getting ready to figure it out. Thanks for the tip.
Believe it or not, I have read, and I do understand the system. That's why I have suffered no series losses to date. Maybe there's one coming up. Who knows?
I do not over emphasize the rpi filter. The way it has been discussed it seems like people are using it as the primary criteria for betting--which it is not. It is only a filter. The system doesn't say, "Hey just look at rpi and bet on those teams with the higher rpi to win."
The system looks for teams that have been swept as the primary criteria to bet on. Then, once that condition has been met, you look at rpi. If the rpi is right, place the bet.
But since you understand the system, then you already know that. I am the one that's getting ready to figure it out. Thanks for the tip.
I know the system, and since I was the one that posted MLB V3 here first, YOUR WELCOME!!!!
Does everybody know that JM changed the RPI in V2 to from .010 to .015???? Just thought I'd let you know...
The enhanced filters that you should use which will eliminate almost all losses is to
1. Pass on any series where the team you’re supposed to wager on has an RPI value that's more than .015 lower than our opponent's.
Here is the example....
nd to May 4th and were swept in all 3 games.
rd, they began another 3-game series with the Minnesota twins, this time at home. Since the Detroit Tigers fell within the accepted .015 range of RPI disparity with the Minnesota Twins at the time, the series was good to go for betting.
https://www.sportsbettingchamp.com/images/_notes/mlbversion3.pdf
0
Hot Forum Topics
