Posted:
#1
What happened to the John Morrison thread? Is it still here, and I just can't see it? I was really following that thread.
0
John Morrison Thread
Posted:
#7
STFU Chicano, JM alias...What about this play, not only a loss but 3 losses.....
0
Posted:
#9
Ok pdg, what are the parameters for MBL V3?
And, are u betting the ML or RL?
I disagree Staxx. He has advertized V3 for almost 2 weeks now, and you could have easily gotten the money to him in the mail and instructions back via email. My buddy sent a check on a WED for WNBA and got an email with the instructions by SATURDAY.
0
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by STAXXX:
STFU Chicano, JM alias...What about this play, not only a loss but 3 losses.....
Not only that. There was a similar email this morning about betting (you guessed it Kansas City again... ummm....on the road... ummm..... as the worst team in the AL (only one team worse in all of MLB).... ummm... against one of the hottest teams in all MLB.... um three game chase... ) the unofficial play. He says, "bet it if you want"
Morrison, you are about to lose your 2nd unofficial series of the year, on a team that sucks at home, sucks on the more on the road, and you want to preach how important it is to play just the official plays??
OK guys, ROYALS ALERT!! ROYALS ALERT!! There's is a possibility the Royals will be "unofficial" plays on the road against the White Sox on 8/17-8/19 and at home against the Angels on 9/4-9/7. Whatever you do, don't even take the bait on 8/17. I may take them small in the Angels series. Oh wait, yeah, the Royals have already been swept at home by the Angels already this year - on second thought, I may not. I don't think he is that stupid to make the Royals an official play.
0
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:
Kong, yes I did share the MLB V2 in the Morrison thread that is in the penalty box. I was hoping someone would share the NBA V2 or MLB V3.
I've checked SBR and therx, but haven't seen either.
Ahh, thats what I thought. I will post V3 here if I find it. If it doesn't show up within a week or two, I will buy it and share it with you guys.
0
Posted:
#16
Smitler, you are correct.
When you have an A game and its at home for the team you are betting, they have to lose the A game by 3 or more runs. Then, you double up or more on the B bet b/c they "never" lose at home after this scenario.
So far this year it has worked everytime. JM claims 7-0, but I think that includes some unnofficial picks, which I don't bet. For me, I think it's hit 4 or 5 times.
0
Posted:
#17
I got it guys! NBA V2
Thank the Kong! I found this on SBR forum!
V2.0 System Update
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play.
Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play:
On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play.
You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point.
Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play.
Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play:
On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play.
You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point.
Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference
0
Posted:
#20
the nba V2 is EXACTLY like his WNBA system. 2 out of 3 non-conferences.
the WNBA hasn't lost yet, it's a pretty good play.
next one is august 8th. i think it's for los angeles road trip. they play phoenix for the A bet so it is a little risky...it's never gone to the B bet this season in WNBA if i'm not mistaken.
the WNBA hasn't lost yet, it's a pretty good play.
next one is august 8th. i think it's for los angeles road trip. they play phoenix for the A bet so it is a little risky...it's never gone to the B bet this season in WNBA if i'm not mistaken.
0
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
I got it guys! NBA V2
Thank the Kong! I found this on SBR forum!
V2.0 System Update
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play.
Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play:
On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play.
You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point.
Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play.
Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play:
On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play.
You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point.
Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference
GREAT JOB KONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
see why we need you around.....................................
0
Posted:
#22
HERE IS MLB V.3 Props goes to SRTZEE:
V3.0 System UPDATE:
The update here is designed to allow you even more betting opportunities during the course of the baseball season by taking advantage of the unofficial plays that fall outside of the acceptable level of RPI difference between the two teams.
The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [b] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [b] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager
The update here is designed to allow you even more betting opportunities during the course of the baseball season by taking advantage of the unofficial plays that fall outside of the acceptable level of RPI difference between the two teams.
The addition to this new v3.0 system is that you want to make a wager for the team that previously did the sweep (NOT the team that was swept previously!) if the following 2 criteria are met:
1. The team that they swept previously came back and beat them on the very first game of theirrematch series.
2. They have an RPI of at least .025 or higher than their opponent.
If your bet loses, you would go on and make a [b] bet for the same team the next day. Most of the v3.0 bets will involve betting on a 2-game series. However, In some rare cases you can also make a [C] bet if both your [A] and [b] bet lose, and the series rematch is a 4-game series allowing you an extra final game to make a [C] wager
Here’s an example of the v3.0 system in action:
During the 2008 MLB baseball season, the Boston Red Sox played the Kansas City
Royals from May 19th to May 22nd and swept them in the entire series.
On August 4th, Boston played Kansas City again in a 3-game series. At this time during the season, Boston's RPI was at least .025 higher than Kansas City, making the series fall outside of the original v1.0 system's betting criteria for Kansas City. However, Kansas City ended up winning the first game of the series on August 4th.
Since Boston was the team that swept Kansas City previously, and their RPI is at least .025 higher than Kansas City, the fact that Kansas City came back and won the first game vs. Boston make the series eligible for play under the v3.0 MLB system.
Therefore, on August 5th, you would put down an [A] bet for Boston to beat Kansas City. Boston ended up winning the game. At this point you've won the betting series, and there's no need to make any more wagers for either team.
IF Boston had lost to Kansas City again on August 5th, then you would need to place a [b] bet for Boston again on August 6th when they play Kansas City in the final game.
There are no possible [C] bets in this series.
During the 2008 MLB baseball season, the Boston Red Sox played the Kansas City
Royals from May 19th to May 22nd and swept them in the entire series.
On August 4th, Boston played Kansas City again in a 3-game series. At this time during the season, Boston's RPI was at least .025 higher than Kansas City, making the series fall outside of the original v1.0 system's betting criteria for Kansas City. However, Kansas City ended up winning the first game of the series on August 4th.
Since Boston was the team that swept Kansas City previously, and their RPI is at least .025 higher than Kansas City, the fact that Kansas City came back and won the first game vs. Boston make the series eligible for play under the v3.0 MLB system.
Therefore, on August 5th, you would put down an [A] bet for Boston to beat Kansas City. Boston ended up winning the game. At this point you've won the betting series, and there's no need to make any more wagers for either team.
IF Boston had lost to Kansas City again on August 5th, then you would need to place a [b] bet for Boston again on August 6th when they play Kansas City in the final game.
There are no possible [C] bets in this series.
0
You da Man Nole! I like our combo today!!!!!!
Posted:
#24
Is anyone thinking about goin' a little crazy on the Thursday's start to the NYY/Boston chase? I mean, the yankers have not won YET this season to Boston, they are playing at home, and the yankers are playing MUCH better than when they were previously SWEPT TWICE by boston.
I might go 2-3x my normal bet on this one. Just depends on the juice. Game A is no big deal, but if it loses and the juice was high, Game B would be a tuffy.
0
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:
Is anyone thinking about goin' a little crazy on the Thursday's start to the NYY/Boston chase? I mean, the yankers have not won YET this season to Boston, they are playing at home, and the yankers are playing MUCH better than when they were previously SWEPT TWICE by boston.
I might go 2-3x my normal bet on this one. Just depends on the juice. Game A is no big deal, but if it loses and the juice was high, Game B would be a tuffy.
I agree, no way in hell do the sox win 9 in a row against the Yanks. Pound NY. I am.
0
Hot Forum Topics
