JM NFL System

Has anyone used the sports betting professor? Does anyone have or know where to get his picks?

Thanks

I don't think illiteracy is your only problem.

Is everything a go for these week 10 potentials?

Yep both have lost 3 time ATS and SU

on3,

Not to confuse the peanut gallery, but isn't Dener a modified by? There are playing a JM play, so maybe you just filtered it?

Thanks for your work,

Jsqd

*modified play

 

to be honest, i didnt know what to do with denver this week since they were going up against a team that fell into the JM system. id like to ask you guys what do you think we should do?

a. play washington under JM system (the line is tricky, 3 seems too easy for denver, and whenever it is too easy you know vegas has something up its sleeve)
b. play denver ML and play washington +3.5 and hope for a middle?
c. play denver ML and save the washington play for next week

im leaning towards option b., but im going to keep my units small for the modified system since it is going against the JM system this week.

B sounds like the best of both worlds.

Arizona is NOT a Modified system play for week 10...they won and covered last weekend vs. Chicago.  Denver and GB are Modified system plays....

For the record, I like Option B from On3 on the Denver/Washington game....Then we can just follow up with the loser for next week if it generates another play.....

I'm using a lab mm, so i'll be going with option B. Probably won't get the middle, but you never know...

2-0

I'm thinkin more like 1-1.  had lions 16.5.  too stupid to buy a half or one.

I bought 1 point for Detroit from +16.5 to +17.5 thinking 17 could be a possibility.  Worked out quite well.

That sucks but for the system it was a winner because the closing line was 17 and the system says to buy a point or a half point on key numbers.

I wouldn't consider 17 a key number. This is exactly from the morrison pdf file:

I also recommend that you buy half a point (.5) onto the point spread if your team happens to be an underdog with an exact spread of either +2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7.

By your reasoning; would 27 would be a key number as well?

My understanding is for spreads that are common week to week like those he lists above (+2.5, +3, +6.5, or +7).

some people use key numbers like 10 17 and 21 also.. 10.5 17.5 and 21.5

Yes I know JM says only to 7 but can you honestly tell me that 14, 17, or 21 are not key numbers? A lot of games end with these key numbers. So yes I do consider it a key number.

another two wins today (with detroit @ +17.5) and washington winning SU. for anyone who plays the JM system, please buy half points on ALL key numbers (10, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21). the juice wont kill you at -130, so why not do it??

also, picked up a win with the modified system with Green Bay. i probably wouldnt have played GB against that agressive Dallas if it didnt fall into the system, so I am glad it worked out and some of you followed.
 
JM System so far: 14-0

Week 11 plays:
NY Giants (B bet, C bet for modified)
Cleveland

Modified Week 11 plays:
Philadelphia ML
Denver Broncos (B bet)

Isn't Denver a 'A' Play under the JM System after 3 straight ATS and SU losses.?  So that would make them an A play under JM and also a B play on the Modified side. 

Yeah Denver should be an A bet this weekend for JM

Yeah Denver is an A bet but for some reason ppl are posting modified versions of the JM NFL system on the JM NFL system and ppl are getting confused. They should start a modified JM NFL system post.

just a note, kyle orton is out for the broncos. JM has a habit of eliminating a loss if a star is out for the team. make sure you play denver with caution this week.

Been following the forum (with success), but never posted...just wanted pass on another note I came across...A supposed JM filter update is recommending that for UD's only double digit NFL UD's should be played on from this point...That would eliminate the DEN (a) and Cle (a)???...It leaves the NYG (b) and the mod on PHI (a)...thoughts...I can paste for review... 

can someone else verify this??

that's only for his playing surface system