So far I have White Sox and A's as new chases starting today...what's your take on the Reds, the line opened -104, -104, but now my line has Reds as slight dog at -102....would you lay off?
0
So far I have White Sox and A's as new chases starting today...what's your take on the Reds, the line opened -104, -104, but now my line has Reds as slight dog at -102....would you lay off?
So far I have White Sox and A's as new chases starting today...what's your take on the Reds, the line opened -104, -104, but now my line has Reds as slight dog at -102....would you lay off?
Cincy opened as a fav @ -125 most places, your book must have opened the line late? They would be a play 2nite, but I've decided not 2 play them this weekend. Either team is capable of sweeping imo.
BOL if u play
0
Quote Originally Posted by diamonddicer:
So far I have White Sox and A's as new chases starting today...what's your take on the Reds, the line opened -104, -104, but now my line has Reds as slight dog at -102....would you lay off?
Cincy opened as a fav @ -125 most places, your book must have opened the line late? They would be a play 2nite, but I've decided not 2 play them this weekend. Either team is capable of sweeping imo.
Hmm.. was pretty sure Florida opened @ even last night.. but oh well. I certainly will not be playing them this weekend, that is as good a fade series as any.. I guess u didn't find that any of the losses from last season were from Interleague play, so maybe it is safe.
BOL Toms.. this Interleague thing might get dicey
Regardless, it will be an entertaining weekend!!
0
Hmm.. was pretty sure Florida opened @ even last night.. but oh well. I certainly will not be playing them this weekend, that is as good a fade series as any.. I guess u didn't find that any of the losses from last season were from Interleague play, so maybe it is safe.
Fla opened as a dog...I had them +104 at one point this morning now they're -117...I'm going to play the Wsox anyway because I love the matchup...Also will add Reds even though they're a dog now.
BOL everyone!
0
Fla opened as a dog...I had them +104 at one point this morning now they're -117...I'm going to play the Wsox anyway because I love the matchup...Also will add Reds even though they're a dog now.
Fla opened as a dog...I had them +104 at one point this morning now they're -117...I'm going to play the Wsox anyway because I love the matchup...Also will add Reds even though they're a dog now.
BOL everyone!
I had Florida open at -110
0
Quote Originally Posted by diamonddicer:
Fla opened as a dog...I had them +104 at one point this morning now they're -117...I'm going to play the Wsox anyway because I love the matchup...Also will add Reds even though they're a dog now.
FLA opened as a FAVORITE at -115, according to covers MLB odds...
if we use covers MLB odds than it should be noted that if you look at yesterday's scoreboard it has the wsox -102 as a slight dog to the twins at -108 making the wsox a play tonight...thats why i took them...bol everyone!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GreenMachine22:
FLA opened as a FAVORITE at -115, according to covers MLB odds...
if we use covers MLB odds than it should be noted that if you look at yesterday's scoreboard it has the wsox -102 as a slight dog to the twins at -108 making the wsox a play tonight...thats why i took them...bol everyone!
So I owe a huge apology to everybody about not looking up the interleague stats before it started. I've just been busy. But I woke up a bit earlier today and had the time to check 2008 stats. Best advice I can give you: Lay off interleague play.
Here's the interleague stats for 2008 (betting each game of series) AL = 9-6 (60.00%)-0.14u NL = 9-18 (33.33%) -9.34u Total = 18-24 (42.86%) -9.48u
(Chase) AL = 5-0 (100.00%) +5.00u NL = 5-5 (50.00%) -34.94u Total = 10-5 (66.67%) -29.94u
So yeah that's terrible. Here's the overall 2008 stats if you didn't play interleague
(betting each game of series) AL = 114-66(63.33%)+28.52u NL = 111-69 (57.97%) +29.58u Total = 225-135 (62.50%) +58.10u
(Chase) AL = 53-2 (96.36%) +33.81u NL = 53-2 (96.36%) +19.58u Total = 106-4 (96.36%) +53.39u
I'll check 2007 later, hoping to see all 3 chase losses in interleague play :P
0
So I owe a huge apology to everybody about not looking up the interleague stats before it started. I've just been busy. But I woke up a bit earlier today and had the time to check 2008 stats. Best advice I can give you: Lay off interleague play.
Here's the interleague stats for 2008 (betting each game of series) AL = 9-6 (60.00%)-0.14u NL = 9-18 (33.33%) -9.34u Total = 18-24 (42.86%) -9.48u
(Chase) AL = 5-0 (100.00%) +5.00u NL = 5-5 (50.00%) -34.94u Total = 10-5 (66.67%) -29.94u
So yeah that's terrible. Here's the overall 2008 stats if you didn't play interleague
(betting each game of series) AL = 114-66(63.33%)+28.52u NL = 111-69 (57.97%) +29.58u Total = 225-135 (62.50%) +58.10u
(Chase) AL = 53-2 (96.36%) +33.81u NL = 53-2 (96.36%) +19.58u Total = 106-4 (96.36%) +53.39u
I'll check 2007 later, hoping to see all 3 chase losses in interleague play :P
Thanks for looking this up Tom, it's about what I was hoping to find. I will also be hoping to see the 3 chase losses from 2007 resulted from Interleague.
On a positive side, great job today by both Florida and Oakland to pull out victories and keep the chase record perfect on the season!!
Here's to another successful week ahead!
0
Thanks for looking this up Tom, it's about what I was hoping to find. I will also be hoping to see the 3 chase losses from 2007 resulted from Interleague.
On a positive side, great job today by both Florida and Oakland to pull out victories and keep the chase record perfect on the season!!
Tomspeople - Here is what I found from the 2007 Interleague series'. I'm sure you will double check these numbers.
The opening weekend was very successful, but after that it was quite downhill. However, the chase only lost once, on the final weekend for the NL. 1st Weekend Set: Detroit 3-0, Philadelphia 2-1 2nd Set: Chicago White Sox 1-2, LA Dodgers 1-2 3rd Set: Houston 1-2 4th Set: Cincinnati 1-2 5th Set: Seattle 2-1, NY Mets 1-2 6th Set: Atlanta 0-3
(betting each game of series) AL = 6-3 (66.67%) did not calculate units NL = 6-12 (33.33%) Total = 12-15 (44.44%)
(chase) AL = 3-0 (100%) NL = 5-1 (83.33%) Total = 8-1 (88.89%)
To me this says to either avoid Interleague play orFade NL teams.
0
Tomspeople - Here is what I found from the 2007 Interleague series'. I'm sure you will double check these numbers.
The opening weekend was very successful, but after that it was quite downhill. However, the chase only lost once, on the final weekend for the NL. 1st Weekend Set: Detroit 3-0, Philadelphia 2-1 2nd Set: Chicago White Sox 1-2, LA Dodgers 1-2 3rd Set: Houston 1-2 4th Set: Cincinnati 1-2 5th Set: Seattle 2-1, NY Mets 1-2 6th Set: Atlanta 0-3
(betting each game of series) AL = 6-3 (66.67%) did not calculate units NL = 6-12 (33.33%) Total = 12-15 (44.44%)
(chase) AL = 3-0 (100%) NL = 5-1 (83.33%) Total = 8-1 (88.89%)
To me this says to either avoid Interleague play orFade NL teams.
If you Faded the NL teams in games which qualified for the system from 2007-current, you would be in great shape.
(betting each game of series) 2007 AL = 18-9 (66.67%)
2008 AL = 27-15 (64.29%)
2009 AL = 4-5 (44.44%)
TOTAL = 49-29 (62.82%)
I did not check each series from 2008, but with the NL only winning 9 games I would guess the NL did not sweep any series? Tom did you notice if there were any NL sweeps when you did your research? If not, then the chase would be a perfect 18-0 as well during Interleague play in the past 3 years, if you Fade the NL teams.
This makes my decision on how to handle the rest of the season quite easy:
During InterLeague play, Fade NL teams which qualify as a system play
What do you think?
0
If you Faded the NL teams in games which qualified for the system from 2007-current, you would be in great shape.
(betting each game of series) 2007 AL = 18-9 (66.67%)
2008 AL = 27-15 (64.29%)
2009 AL = 4-5 (44.44%)
TOTAL = 49-29 (62.82%)
I did not check each series from 2008, but with the NL only winning 9 games I would guess the NL did not sweep any series? Tom did you notice if there were any NL sweeps when you did your research? If not, then the chase would be a perfect 18-0 as well during Interleague play in the past 3 years, if you Fade the NL teams.
This makes my decision on how to handle the rest of the season quite easy:
During InterLeague play, Fade NL teams which qualify as a system play
tomspeople good 3 teamer 5-24-09fla cin oak 3tp for 200 to win 1194 so it took 2 days 1194 - 400 = 794 profit i like the you post the plays you give the date and then the plays easy!!!!!!!!! here is some plays from totals chase that also works GAMES FOR MAY 25 ^ stlcards ^ pitts ^ det under tbay pesonal plays toronto, cubs , mets, hou GOODLUCK
0
tomspeople good 3 teamer 5-24-09fla cin oak 3tp for 200 to win 1194 so it took 2 days 1194 - 400 = 794 profit i like the you post the plays you give the date and then the plays easy!!!!!!!!! here is some plays from totals chase that also works GAMES FOR MAY 25 ^ stlcards ^ pitts ^ det under tbay pesonal plays toronto, cubs , mets, hou GOODLUCK