Destroy the Books! *Double your Bankroll*
Hey DJ,I have question..why ML on NBA and why spread and ML in one game?I don't thing there is anybody else who making these bets in NBA,it's there any reason for it?
Sometimes the edge is on the spread, sometimes it is on the ML, sometimes it is on both. Don't know what else to say... but I will note that just because a certain team has multiple plays associated with it for that night does NOT mean it is stronger. All plays should be valued individually by their respective percentage.
Hey DJ,I have question..why ML on NBA and why spread and ML in one game?I don't thing there is anybody else who making these bets in NBA,it's there any reason for it?
Sometimes the edge is on the spread, sometimes it is on the ML, sometimes it is on both. Don't know what else to say... but I will note that just because a certain team has multiple plays associated with it for that night does NOT mean it is stronger. All plays should be valued individually by their respective percentage.
/
Record: 54-42-0
Bankroll: $7854.38
Wagered: $15744.18
Returned: $18598.56
Net: +$2854.38
ROI: +18.13%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Inter [+104] 5% -392.72 to win 408.43
Orlando Magic +3.5 [-105] 3% -235.63 to win 224.41
Record: 56-45-0
Bankroll: $7858.87
Wagered: $17000.88
Returned: $19859.75
Net: +$2858.87
ROI: +16.82%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Illinois -17 [-107] 2% -157.09 to win 146.81 *Made yesterday but counted today*
Washington Capitals [-113] 3% -235.77 to win 208.65
/
Record: 54-42-0
Bankroll: $7854.38
Wagered: $15744.18
Returned: $18598.56
Net: +$2854.38
ROI: +18.13%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Inter [+104] 5% -392.72 to win 408.43
Orlando Magic +3.5 [-105] 3% -235.63 to win 224.41
Record: 56-45-0
Bankroll: $7858.87
Wagered: $17000.88
Returned: $19859.75
Net: +$2858.87
ROI: +16.82%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Illinois -17 [-107] 2% -157.09 to win 146.81 *Made yesterday but counted today*
Washington Capitals [-113] 3% -235.77 to win 208.65
Record: 56-45-0
Net: +$2858.87
ROI: +16.82%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Illinois -17 [-107] 2% -157.09 to win 146.81
Baylor +7.5 [-106] 2% -157.18 to win 148.28
Washington Capitals [-113] 3% -235.77 to win 208.65
Record: 62-47-2
Bankroll: $8679.44
Wagered: $18965.54
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3679.44
ROI: +19.40%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Redskins [+130] 2% -173.59 to win 225.67
Panthers [+126] 2% -173.59 to win 218.72
Seahawks [+115] 2% -173.59 to win 199.63
Record: 56-45-0
Net: +$2858.87
ROI: +16.82%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Illinois -17 [-107] 2% -157.09 to win 146.81
Baylor +7.5 [-106] 2% -157.18 to win 148.28
Washington Capitals [-113] 3% -235.77 to win 208.65
Record: 62-47-2
Bankroll: $8679.44
Wagered: $18965.54
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3679.44
ROI: +19.40%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Redskins [+130] 2% -173.59 to win 225.67
Panthers [+126] 2% -173.59 to win 218.72
Seahawks [+115] 2% -173.59 to win 199.63
Record: 62-47-2
Bankroll: $8679.44
Wagered: $18965.54
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3679.44
ROI: +19.40%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Redskins [+130] 2% -173.59 to win 225.67
Panthers [+126] 2% -173.59 to win 218.72
Seahawks [+115] 2% -173.59 to win 199.63
I forced these plays... didn't cap them well enough. Just took what I thought were some live dogs from my preliminary capping. I even had it typed in that I was going to lay off but I guess I'm more degenerate than I thought.
Record: 62-47-2
Bankroll: $8679.44
Wagered: $18965.54
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3679.44
ROI: +19.40%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Redskins [+130] 2% -173.59 to win 225.67
Panthers [+126] 2% -173.59 to win 218.72
Seahawks [+115] 2% -173.59 to win 199.63
I forced these plays... didn't cap them well enough. Just took what I thought were some live dogs from my preliminary capping. I even had it typed in that I was going to lay off but I guess I'm more degenerate than I thought.
Record: 62-47-2
Bankroll: $8679.44
Wagered: $18965.54
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3679.44
ROI: +19.40%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Redskins [+130] 2% -173.59 to win 225.67
Panthers [+126] 2% -173.59 to win 218.72
Seahawks [+115] 2% -173.59 to win 199.63
Record: 62-50-2
Bankroll: $8158.67
Wagered: $19486.31
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3158.67
ROI: +16.21%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Carolina Hurricanes [+170] 2% -163.17 to win 277.39
Blackhawks/Rangers [-110] 2% -163.17 to win 148.34
Portland Trail Blazers [+102] 2% -163.17 to win 166.43
Siena 'pk' [-103] 5% -407.93 to win 396.05
Levante +0.5 & +1 [-103] 3% -244.76 to win 237.63
Ascoli +0.5 & +1 [+101] 2% -163.17 to win 164.80
Record: 62-47-2
Bankroll: $8679.44
Wagered: $18965.54
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3679.44
ROI: +19.40%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Redskins [+130] 2% -173.59 to win 225.67
Panthers [+126] 2% -173.59 to win 218.72
Seahawks [+115] 2% -173.59 to win 199.63
Record: 62-50-2
Bankroll: $8158.67
Wagered: $19486.31
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3158.67
ROI: +16.21%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Carolina Hurricanes [+170] 2% -163.17 to win 277.39
Blackhawks/Rangers [-110] 2% -163.17 to win 148.34
Portland Trail Blazers [+102] 2% -163.17 to win 166.43
Siena 'pk' [-103] 5% -407.93 to win 396.05
Levante +0.5 & +1 [-103] 3% -244.76 to win 237.63
Ascoli +0.5 & +1 [+101] 2% -163.17 to win 164.80
Levante +0.5 & +1 [-103] 3% -244.76 to win 237.63
Ascoli +0.5 & +1 [+101] 2% -163.17 to win 164.80
Both Dogs bite early! Let's hope for a lil better luck than that early game heartbreak. WOOF! WOOF!
Levante +0.5 & +1 [-103] 3% -244.76 to win 237.63
Ascoli +0.5 & +1 [+101] 2% -163.17 to win 164.80
Both Dogs bite early! Let's hope for a lil better luck than that early game heartbreak. WOOF! WOOF!
Record: 62-50-2
Bankroll: $8158.67
Wagered: $19486.31
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3158.67
ROI: +16.21%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Carolina Hurricanes [+170] 2% -163.17 to win 277.39
Blackhawks/Rangers U5.5 [-110] 2% -163.17 to win 148.34
Portland Trail Blazers [+102] 2% -163.17 to win 166.43
Siena 'pk' [-103] 5% -407.93 to win 396.05
Levante +0.5 & +1 [-103] 3% -244.76 to win 237.63
Ascoli +0.5 & +1 [+101] 2% -163.17 to win 164.80
Record: 63-52-5
Bankroll: $7776.70
Wagered: $20791.68
Returned: $23568.39
Net: +$2776.70
ROI: +13.35%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Record: 62-50-2
Bankroll: $8158.67
Wagered: $19486.31
Returned: $22644.98
Net: +$3158.67
ROI: +16.21%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Carolina Hurricanes [+170] 2% -163.17 to win 277.39
Blackhawks/Rangers U5.5 [-110] 2% -163.17 to win 148.34
Portland Trail Blazers [+102] 2% -163.17 to win 166.43
Siena 'pk' [-103] 5% -407.93 to win 396.05
Levante +0.5 & +1 [-103] 3% -244.76 to win 237.63
Ascoli +0.5 & +1 [+101] 2% -163.17 to win 164.80
Record: 63-52-5
Bankroll: $7776.70
Wagered: $20791.68
Returned: $23568.39
Net: +$2776.70
ROI: +13.35%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Record: 63-52-5
Bankroll: $7776.70
Wagered: $20791.68
Returned: $23568.39
Net: +$2776.70
ROI: +13.35%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Record: 66-54-5
Bankroll: $8124.01
Wagered: $21880.41
Returned: $25004.42
Net: +$3124.01
ROI: +14.28%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Record: 63-52-5
Bankroll: $7776.70
Wagered: $20791.68
Returned: $23568.39
Net: +$2776.70
ROI: +13.35%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Record: 66-54-5
Bankroll: $8124.01
Wagered: $21880.41
Returned: $25004.42
Net: +$3124.01
ROI: +14.28%
_____________________________ ______ _____ ____ ___ __ _ _
Good Luck DJ, was looking at the Arsenal game earlier and liked it as well. Locked in the (0 and -0.5) for +152 earlier. I see the pk is up to +117 now.
Looked at Chelsea, too. Gonna make small play on them (-2 and -2.5) for +152 as well as that Over.
Gotta like the Bruins tonight with Lalime in goal.
Cheers ![]()
Good Luck DJ, was looking at the Arsenal game earlier and liked it as well. Locked in the (0 and -0.5) for +152 earlier. I see the pk is up to +117 now.
Looked at Chelsea, too. Gonna make small play on them (-2 and -2.5) for +152 as well as that Over.
Gotta like the Bruins tonight with Lalime in goal.
Cheers ![]()
dj what are ur thoughts on taking some hockey games at +1/2 or -1/2 for 60 mins at much better lines.
for example i took bruins 1 Boston Bruins (1st 60 min) -½ +135 instead of 1 Boston Bruins -120* vs Buffalo Sabres ..wonder if this is a bad idea or not
dj what are ur thoughts on taking some hockey games at +1/2 or -1/2 for 60 mins at much better lines.
for example i took bruins 1 Boston Bruins (1st 60 min) -½ +135 instead of 1 Boston Bruins -120* vs Buffalo Sabres ..wonder if this is a bad idea or not
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,018
-
PART DEUX
247
-
Friday 09/18/2026
759
-
The Three-Day Money Train
4,079
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
258,455
-
Trump's legacy?
25,442
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
21,364
-
Week 3 Money
6,080
-
NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS***
7,017
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
29,073
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
