Hey Tony, I am very familiar with this system but have one quick question. Shouldn't you be betting on the Tigers in game 1 against Anaheim. They have lost 5 straight at home, and your theory basically states that a team who has shown the ability to win 3 straight at home will not lose more than 4 in a row at home.
So while I understand that your chase is over and you are not going to bet enormous on them tonight, wouldn't they almost be a strong candidate to start a new chase with?
0
Hey Tony, I am very familiar with this system but have one quick question. Shouldn't you be betting on the Tigers in game 1 against Anaheim. They have lost 5 straight at home, and your theory basically states that a team who has shown the ability to win 3 straight at home will not lose more than 4 in a row at home.
So while I understand that your chase is over and you are not going to bet enormous on them tonight, wouldn't they almost be a strong candidate to start a new chase with?
Hey Tony, I am very familiar with this system but have one quick question. Shouldn't you be betting on the Tigers in game 1 against Anaheim. They have lost 5 straight at home, and your theory basically states that a team who has shown the ability to win 3 straight at home will not lose more than 4 in a row at home.
So while I understand that your chase is over and you are not going to bet enormous on them tonight, wouldn't they almost be a strong candidate to start a new chase with?
GOOD POINT AND SOMETHING LIKE THAT COULD BE FILTERED IN AT A LATER DATE. RIGHT NOW IM STICKING TO WHATS BEEN PROVEN TO WIN SO IM GANNA STAY WITH WHAT GOT ME HERE. THANKS FOR THE SUGGESTION THOUGH IT WOULD PROBABLY BE A GREAT THING TO FILTER IN.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:
Hey Tony, I am very familiar with this system but have one quick question. Shouldn't you be betting on the Tigers in game 1 against Anaheim. They have lost 5 straight at home, and your theory basically states that a team who has shown the ability to win 3 straight at home will not lose more than 4 in a row at home.
So while I understand that your chase is over and you are not going to bet enormous on them tonight, wouldn't they almost be a strong candidate to start a new chase with?
GOOD POINT AND SOMETHING LIKE THAT COULD BE FILTERED IN AT A LATER DATE. RIGHT NOW IM STICKING TO WHATS BEEN PROVEN TO WIN SO IM GANNA STAY WITH WHAT GOT ME HERE. THANKS FOR THE SUGGESTION THOUGH IT WOULD PROBABLY BE A GREAT THING TO FILTER IN.
What is the betting incriment(sp?) for everyone on this thread?
I have to admit i hate chase systems because i just dont like the fact that you basically have to hit like 90% to break even. If someone could provide some betting statistics to prove that this is a profitable system, i would really appreciate it.
Please understand that i am not bashing this or any system that involves chasing. Im just trying to understand how chasing is a profitable scenario without have to bet like 10K to win 1K after 2 or 3 games of chasing.
Thank you for your time.
0
What is the betting incriment(sp?) for everyone on this thread?
I have to admit i hate chase systems because i just dont like the fact that you basically have to hit like 90% to break even. If someone could provide some betting statistics to prove that this is a profitable system, i would really appreciate it.
Please understand that i am not bashing this or any system that involves chasing. Im just trying to understand how chasing is a profitable scenario without have to bet like 10K to win 1K after 2 or 3 games of chasing.
ive been reading ur post dis couple of days. im new in mlb betting, i just want to ask the typ of betting. my bookie gave me ex: st.luis+1 pk/ col-1 pk...---- wat does dat mean? sometimes its +1/-1pk or +1pk/-1
0
ive been reading ur post dis couple of days. im new in mlb betting, i just want to ask the typ of betting. my bookie gave me ex: st.luis+1 pk/ col-1 pk...---- wat does dat mean? sometimes its +1/-1pk or +1pk/-1
im from phils and its just a local bookie.. lol... so its means if i bet on st louis the points is-1, ryt? but i dont get is if theres -1 how come theres also pk. i assume pk is pick, ryt? tnx for replying tony.. and super tnx for posting.. specialy on early post. u know time zone sucks... lol...
0
im from phils and its just a local bookie.. lol... so its means if i bet on st louis the points is-1, ryt? but i dont get is if theres -1 how come theres also pk. i assume pk is pick, ryt? tnx for replying tony.. and super tnx for posting.. specialy on early post. u know time zone sucks... lol...
ya he probably meant st.louis -1 no +1 and the way bookies work you probably lose on a tie. If I was you I would just deal with online sportsbooks. GOODLUCK!
0
ya he probably meant st.louis -1 no +1 and the way bookies work you probably lose on a tie. If I was you I would just deal with online sportsbooks. GOODLUCK!
Me not so happy :-( Took the wife and kids to the zoo sunday and forgot about the afternoon games. Could check the thread with Tonys bets where i was and arrived home just in time to see that all the games i was going to bet on had already started. So i missed a big chunk of cash and it kills me right now. Strange that you always seem to get your losing bets in before deadline...
0
Me not so happy :-( Took the wife and kids to the zoo sunday and forgot about the afternoon games. Could check the thread with Tonys bets where i was and arrived home just in time to see that all the games i was going to bet on had already started. So i missed a big chunk of cash and it kills me right now. Strange that you always seem to get your losing bets in before deadline...
tony, tnx again for the early post. but got a question, seeing some and your record is still 32-2?? does some of it comes from yourself not on the system? tnx tony...
0
tony, tnx again for the early post. but got a question, seeing some and your record is still 32-2?? does some of it comes from yourself not on the system? tnx tony...
Hot Forum Topics
