All Forums | Systems & Strategies

4 GAME CHASE SYSTEM 51-1 SO FAR THIS YEAR

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 29841
Posts: 364
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #1
I might be on to something here if you chase it for 5 games its 52-0 but i will take 51-1!!!!! If a team loses 3 or more road games, then after the 1st win chase a loss for that team the next 4 road games. If a team wins 3 or more home games, then after the 1st loss chase a win for that team for the next 4 home games. I plan on getting data from the last few years but all i have for now is this year. ANY FEEDBACK WOULD BE GREAT!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 155
Posted: #2
GOOD WORK. I RUN A VERY SIMILAR SYSTEM.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1476
Posted: #3
Looks neat, hoping to see some past year stats.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #4
I just ran the American League for 2008 came up with 142-3 . I will run National tomorrow as well as 2007,2006,2005
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 6207
Posted: #5
 WHAT TEAM FOR TOMOROW ?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by TONYALLDAY3:

" If a team loses 3 or more road games, then after the 1st win, chase a loss for that team the next 4 road games. If a team wins 3 or more home games, then after the 1st loss chase a win for that team for the next 4 home games".  ANY FEEDBACK WOULD BE GREAT!!!

Based on the above explained system, could you also explain what 'form' of research did you apply to get 142-3 for the 08' season? ......best regards SN

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #7
the record is chasing 4 games so not each individual game. the 2008 record is just american league, I wont have time to do the national league until tomorrow.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #8
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR TUES:
 
GAME 1:
TEX
MIN
ARI (SD to lose)
KC (CWS to lose)
LAA (DET to lose)
PHI (FLA to lose)
 
GAME 2:
CUBS (PIT to lose)
 
SYSTEM RECORD: 0-0
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1582
Posted: #9
will keep an eye on this i added u as a friend gl bud
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1367
Posted: #10
Looks awsome...I'm doing reserch on the RL...bigger profit ...maybe
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #11
do you have any filters so far. does your system include every team?  you might want to consider eliminating like the top trhree teams or somthing like that.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 50
Posted: #12
What you are saying is; if a road team looses five of a six game road trip, and wins its sixth, then the next time they are on the road bet for them to loose? We are looking for three or more consecutive loses to qualify? Correct? The opposite would be true for a home team. Just trying to understand before I test it.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1864
Posted: #13
looking good, tonight
 
 i think Brewers qualify tomorrow & Angels again if they lose, but not 100% sure
 
 i will be in this thread following
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #14
yes Putso thats it. I plan on doing some more research and maybe eliminating bad teams. Its hard to find the time though. Im working on it
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #15
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR TUES:
 
GAME 1:
TEX
MIN
ARI (SD to lose)
KC (CWS to lose)
LAA (DET to lose)
PHI (FLA to lose)
 
GAME 2:
CUBS (PIT to lose)
 
SYSTEM RECORD: 6-0
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #16
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR WED:
 
GAME 1:
BREWERS
 
GAME 2:
LAA (CWS to lose)
 
SYSTEM RECORD 6-0
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 4036
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by TONYALLDAY3:

I just ran the American League for 2008 came up with 142-3 . I will run National tomorrow as well as 2007,2006,2005

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #18
I just got done researching the NL EAST from 2005 to present.
 
ATLANTA
05: 7-0 3-0 = 10-0
06: 5-0  4-0 = 9-0
07: 6-1 5-0 = 11-1
08: 5-0 9-0 =  14-0
09: 1-0 1-0 = 2-0
TOTAL = 46-1
 
FLORDIA
05: 4-0 6-0 = 10-0
06: 5-0 5-0 = 10-0
07: 2-2 6-0 = 8-2
08: 2-0 6-0 = 8-0
09: 1-0 3-0 = 4-0
TOTAL 40-2
 
METS
05: 7-0 6-1 = 13-1
06: 7-0 3-0 = 10-0
07: 4-0 3-1 = 7-1
08: 8-0 2-1 = 10-1
09: 1-0 2-0 = 3-0
TOTAL: 43-3
 
PHILLIES
05: 7-0 5-0 = 12-0
06: 3-1 2-0 = 5-1
07: 9-0 2-0 = 11-0
08: 7-0 2-0 = 9-0
09: 0-0 0-0 = 0-0
TOTAL: 37-1
 
NATIONALS
05: 6-0 4-0 = 10-0
06: 5-0 8-0 = 13-0
07: 4-0 5-0 = 9-0
08: 2-2 7-0 = 9-2
09: 0-0 2-0 = 2-0
TOTAL: 43-2
 
TOTAL NL EAST  SINCE 2005:  210-9
 
IF YOU CHASE 5: 216-3
 
IF YOU CHASE 6: 218-1
 
IF YOU CHASE 7: 219-0
 
Realy hard to chase 7 oviously so ganna continue to do the other teams and see what we can filter out. You can take away 4 of the 9 losses from above if you stayed away from the Nats to win last year when they were horrible and the Marlins in 07 when they were a last place team. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #19
ALLDAY / thx for posting the stats ...valuable handicapping data...
interesting thread...thorough approach.... best regards 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 82
Posted: #20
nice system 

here are the numbers i calculated...  hope you don't mind

season/ profit/ w-l/ wperc/ biggest loss /most money invested in one day

full system:
2000.  166,90u  315-5       98,44%  -58,49u    64,73u
2001.   13,29u  289-16      94,75%  -34,96u    47,41u
2002.  139,05u  334-15     95,70%  -22,76u   35,00u
2003.    68,88u  323-13     96,13%  -80,15u   80,15u
2004.   -68,00u  295-14     95,47%  -90,50u   132,34u
2005.  119,85u  312-12     96,30%  -26,58u    35,01u
2006.  140,22u  328-10     97,04%  -55,71u    90,32u
2007.   -35,43u  313-14     95,72%  -54,65u    56,60u
2008.  143,51u  321-8       97,57%  -47,19u    56,84u
2009.   29,10u     59-1      98,33%  -29,90u     29,89u

fading away team:

2000.  105,10u   160-3    98,16%  -36,92u   39,66u 
2001.    -8,83u    144-8   94,74%  -30,25u    31,40u
2002.   63,29u    165-7   95,93%  -22,76u    29,05u
2003.   10,65u    161-6   96,41%  -80,15u    80,15u
2004.   58,90u    148-5   96,73%  -27,76u    27,75u 
2005.   41,57u    152-7   95,60%  -26,58u    28,18u
2006.   79,92u    165-6   96,49%  -18,60u    30,30u
2007.   56,16u    151-4   97,42%  -30,31u    43,97u
2008.  118,67u   157-3   98,13%  -15,04u    18,25u
2009.   31,00u      31-0 100,00%    0,00u       8,24u

chasing home win:

2000.     61,80u   155-2    98,73%  -58,49u     63,60u
2001.     22,13u   145-8    94,77%  -34,96u     35,90u
2002.     75,76u   169-8    95,48%  -22,58u     28,05u
2003.     58,23u   162-7    95,86%  -36,13u     37,58u
2004.   -126,90u  147-9    94,23%  -90,50u    132,34u
2005.     78,28u   160-5    96,97%  -21,61u     26,73u
2006.     60,30u   163-4    97,60%  -55,71u     59,95u
2007.    -91,59u   162-10  94,19%  -54,65u     56,60u
2008.     24,83u   164-5    97,04%  -47,19u     54,84u
2009.      -1,90u    28-1    96,55%  -29,90u      29,90u

games of 5/26 not included

i'm not keen on chase systems... but this looks very promising. away team fade would be my choice

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #21
and even more stats Thx 'pero' your contribution is appreciated. This thread is filling my data base......
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1332
Posted: #22
6-1 on Tuesday....very good. Thanks for your work. Appreciate your sharing. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #23
Pero thanks man. My work schedule is draining and its hard for me to find time to do all the research. Now we gotta filter out the bad. Suggestions are deffinatly appreciated
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 93
Posted: #24
I am a bit confused here ?????????
 
Your 1st orignal post states what is says below, then another poster comes on and re-states your orignal post and it seems a bit different. and yet you agree with him. See below.... Which is the correct way to play this sytem.
 
Thank you.............................. 
 
 
Post # 1  !!!!!!!!!!!!
I might be on to something here if you chase it for 5 games its 52-0 but i will take 51-1!!!!! If a team loses 3 or more road games, then after the 1st win chase a loss for that team the next 4 road games. If a team wins 3 or more home games, then after the 1st loss chase a win for that team for the next 4 home games. I plan on getting data from the last few years but all i have for now is this year. ANY FEEDBACK WOULD BE GREAT!!!
 
Reply from different poster !!!!!!!
What you are saying is; if a road team looses five of a six game road trip, and wins its sixth, then the next time they are on the road bet for them to loose? We are looking for three or more consecutive loses to qualify? Correct? The opposite would be true for a home team. Just trying to understand before I test it.
 
Reply from orignal poster !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yes Putso thats it. I plan on doing some more research and maybe eliminating bad teams. Its hard to find the time though. Im working on it
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 93
Posted: #25
Just to be 100%......................
 
Once again what is the optimal way to play this system...........
 
Filters inculded.
 
Thanks 
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.