Hi, haven't seen thread 1, when I have a chance I'll seek it out. I've done a lot of work on this type of topic (I've written a book manuscript football/futbol betting that's been with a publisher for a year now), and I can verify that the most important aspect of all betting is price, because all bets are essentially 50-50 no matter what the odds say...therefore it seldom pays to take a bet with any juice. I have one exception to this, but in every other case I only bet large underdogs (my rule is I bet against favorites of 2.00 or under). That way my losses are 1 unit, while my wins are 2.5 to 6 units. I look for cases where for example something that happens 33% of the time is paid as if it happens 25% of the time. Using my strategy generally I would sort all that data, and if I found that South American teams were costing me money, I wouldn't play them anymore. One thing I've found is that there are some leagues where a late goal often is answered by a second late goal. But these are probably not the case in red card situations, where you've got one team that you don't expect will score again. Another thing I've found is that a team holding a 1-goal advantage that is suddenly playing 11 against 10 won't score another goal necessarily even when the odds are priced as if it's a gimme. They don't need to score another, and they often don't. The incidence of another goal is much higher, actually, when they really don't need to score again (say, they're leading 3-nil) and are merely scoring for fun (or more likely they've already shown that their opponent can't defend). By the way, the place where I originally concluded that getting plus-money was the most important aspect involved totals in the lower English leagues. It's uncanny how the matches with the best odds for over 2.5 goals (typically +113 or so) are the ones that go over, not the matches paying -140.
Red Card Goal Tracking Thread #2
Posted:
#976
Quote Originally Posted by garbagetime:
Hi, haven't seen thread 1, when I have a chance I'll seek it out. I've done a lot of work on this type of topic (I've written a book manuscript football/futbol betting that's been with a publisher for a year now), and I can verify that the most important aspect of all betting is price, because all bets are essentially 50-50 no matter what the odds say...therefore it seldom pays to take a bet with any juice. I have one exception to this, but in every other case I only bet large underdogs (my rule is I bet against favorites of 2.00 or under). That way my losses are 1 unit, while my wins are 2.5 to 6 units. I look for cases where for example something that happens 33% of the time is paid as if it happens 25% of the time. Using my strategy generally I would sort all that data, and if I found that South American teams were costing me money, I wouldn't play them anymore. One thing I've found is that there are some leagues where a late goal often is answered by a second late goal. But these are probably not the case in red card situations, where you've got one team that you don't expect will score again. Another thing I've found is that a team holding a 1-goal advantage that is suddenly playing 11 against 10 won't score another goal necessarily even when the odds are priced as if it's a gimme. They don't need to score another, and they often don't. The incidence of another goal is much higher, actually, when they really don't need to score again (say, they're leading 3-nil) and are merely scoring for fun (or more likely they've already shown that their opponent can't defend). By the way, the place where I originally concluded that getting plus-money was the most important aspect involved totals in the lower English leagues. It's uncanny how the matches with the best odds for over 2.5 goals (typically +113 or so) are the ones that go over, not the matches paying -140.
This all makes sense to me and have observed all the same over my years watching 10s of thousands of matches. Hi, haven't seen thread 1, when I have a chance I'll seek it out. I've done a lot of work on this type of topic (I've written a book manuscript football/futbol betting that's been with a publisher for a year now), and I can verify that the most important aspect of all betting is price, because all bets are essentially 50-50 no matter what the odds say...therefore it seldom pays to take a bet with any juice. I have one exception to this, but in every other case I only bet large underdogs (my rule is I bet against favorites of 2.00 or under). That way my losses are 1 unit, while my wins are 2.5 to 6 units. I look for cases where for example something that happens 33% of the time is paid as if it happens 25% of the time. Using my strategy generally I would sort all that data, and if I found that South American teams were costing me money, I wouldn't play them anymore. One thing I've found is that there are some leagues where a late goal often is answered by a second late goal. But these are probably not the case in red card situations, where you've got one team that you don't expect will score again. Another thing I've found is that a team holding a 1-goal advantage that is suddenly playing 11 against 10 won't score another goal necessarily even when the odds are priced as if it's a gimme. They don't need to score another, and they often don't. The incidence of another goal is much higher, actually, when they really don't need to score again (say, they're leading 3-nil) and are merely scoring for fun (or more likely they've already shown that their opponent can't defend). By the way, the place where I originally concluded that getting plus-money was the most important aspect involved totals in the lower English leagues. It's uncanny how the matches with the best odds for over 2.5 goals (typically +113 or so) are the ones that go over, not the matches paying -140.
Quote Originally Posted by garbagetime:
Hi, haven't seen thread 1, when I have a chance I'll seek it out. I've done a lot of work on this type of topic (I've written a book manuscript football/futbol betting that's been with a publisher for a year now), and I can verify that the most important aspect of all betting is price, because all bets are essentially 50-50 no matter what the odds say...therefore it seldom pays to take a bet with any juice. I have one exception to this, but in every other case I only bet large underdogs (my rule is I bet against favorites of 2.00 or under). That way my losses are 1 unit, while my wins are 2.5 to 6 units. I look for cases where for example something that happens 33% of the time is paid as if it happens 25% of the time. Using my strategy generally I would sort all that data, and if I found that South American teams were costing me money, I wouldn't play them anymore. One thing I've found is that there are some leagues where a late goal often is answered by a second late goal. But these are probably not the case in red card situations, where you've got one team that you don't expect will score again. Another thing I've found is that a team holding a 1-goal advantage that is suddenly playing 11 against 10 won't score another goal necessarily even when the odds are priced as if it's a gimme. They don't need to score another, and they often don't. The incidence of another goal is much higher, actually, when they really don't need to score again (say, they're leading 3-nil) and are merely scoring for fun (or more likely they've already shown that their opponent can't defend). By the way, the place where I originally concluded that getting plus-money was the most important aspect involved totals in the lower English leagues. It's uncanny how the matches with the best odds for over 2.5 goals (typically +113 or so) are the ones that go over, not the matches paying -140.
This all makes sense to me and have observed all the same over my years watching 10s of thousands of matches. Hi, haven't seen thread 1, when I have a chance I'll seek it out. I've done a lot of work on this type of topic (I've written a book manuscript football/futbol betting that's been with a publisher for a year now), and I can verify that the most important aspect of all betting is price, because all bets are essentially 50-50 no matter what the odds say...therefore it seldom pays to take a bet with any juice. I have one exception to this, but in every other case I only bet large underdogs (my rule is I bet against favorites of 2.00 or under). That way my losses are 1 unit, while my wins are 2.5 to 6 units. I look for cases where for example something that happens 33% of the time is paid as if it happens 25% of the time. Using my strategy generally I would sort all that data, and if I found that South American teams were costing me money, I wouldn't play them anymore. One thing I've found is that there are some leagues where a late goal often is answered by a second late goal. But these are probably not the case in red card situations, where you've got one team that you don't expect will score again. Another thing I've found is that a team holding a 1-goal advantage that is suddenly playing 11 against 10 won't score another goal necessarily even when the odds are priced as if it's a gimme. They don't need to score another, and they often don't. The incidence of another goal is much higher, actually, when they really don't need to score again (say, they're leading 3-nil) and are merely scoring for fun (or more likely they've already shown that their opponent can't defend). By the way, the place where I originally concluded that getting plus-money was the most important aspect involved totals in the lower English leagues. It's uncanny how the matches with the best odds for over 2.5 goals (typically +113 or so) are the ones that go over, not the matches paying -140.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 461,204
- PART DEUX 369
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 275,016
- Wednesday 10/14/2026 962
- 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,824
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 42,621
- NFL LOCKED IN! 107,100
- I'm Back, and I'm betting the same wager AGAIN... 4,390
- BREW/LAD live in game comments welcome 483
- the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 21,297
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
