The results are shockingly bad so far, it looks I'm just losing time and money.
I thought that trialing results for almost 1.5 months over 186 plays is enough for a solid conclusion, but it looks I was very wrong. I do not have any explanation for getting practically opposite outcomes to what I expected, other than maybe all seasons nearing to their finals yield totally different results applying my same crieria than earlier in the seasons.
Probably those are right who are considering that any purely numbers based handicapping methods need to be trialed at least for a half year or 1000 plays (which comes earlier) before going in with money. With this method no way I can trial for half year, because that would be way too much time consuming.
The results are shockingly bad so far, it looks I'm just losing time and money.
I thought that trialing results for almost 1.5 months over 186 plays is enough for a solid conclusion, but it looks I was very wrong. I do not have any explanation for getting practically opposite outcomes to what I expected, other than maybe all seasons nearing to their finals yield totally different results applying my same crieria than earlier in the seasons.
Probably those are right who are considering that any purely numbers based handicapping methods need to be trialed at least for a half year or 1000 plays (which comes earlier) before going in with money. With this method no way I can trial for half year, because that would be way too much time consuming.