Posted:
#101
Interception
Seattle at St. Louis (10/28/2013)
Posted:
#105
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying… 
I need a copy of that report on my desk by Friday 9:oo A.M.
Posted:
#110
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
If it was funny .Are you serious posting , re-hashing same clumsy drivel time after time ? Mental disability perhaps ? Peace out.
Posted:
#112
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
holtnt,
"You had my curiosity, now you have my attention!"
Sincerely,
Noobie
Posted:
#113
Quote Originally Posted by WHOjulsCARDINAL:
well the refs are being fukin paid by vegas. this site is also run by vegas. vegas pays the refs to throw flags on favored teams. ITS A KNOWN FACT
well the refs are being fukin paid by vegas. this site is also run by vegas. vegas pays the refs to throw flags on favored teams. ITS A KNOWN FACT
Seriously?? You're just mad bc you bet a double digit road favorite. Seriously, that's a sucker bet. Like I posted earlier double digit home underdogs are 23-7 the past 5 years and are 1-0 this year prior to this game. And no the Jags-49ers game in London doesn't count because that's a neutral site.
Posted:
#114
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Saint Louis is playing solid defense, but not good enough to hold that Seattle offense scoreless (that touchdown they have on the board is basically attributed to the defense).
Just as I stated back on that Central Florida/Louisville thread (Post #64) on my list of “crooks,” at that point Russell Wilson wasn’t a confirmed bandit, but tonight’s performance let’s me know he HAS taken a bite of the “poison apple” (The Wise Men in Vegas own him now).
I’m
NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying…
Holnt ever consider it could be many other factors, other than Russell Wilson throwing the game? Oh you know, like the Rams d line absolutely destroying the Seahawks offensive line. Additionally, Zac Stacy has ran all over the Shehawks tonight. Hell the entire Seattle team must have been paid off bc this piss poor effort applies to nearly their entire team!
Posted:
#123
Quote Originally Posted by bigdoggggggg:
Quote Originally Posted by shochuman:
6-0 ATS is very impressive! Congratulations!!
(You should however post all your games here on Covers if you going to make that claim the next time. Just saying........)
Seattle is the easy side to pick. I think the Seahawks is awesome team! But every Tom, person, and Harry have picked Seattle ATS tonight.
I just think on Monday Night when it's the only game in town, I cannot see Vegas paying off everyone. They already gave the public a gift on Sunday Night with GB. Can not see two gifts in a row.
If you have to play tonight, side with VEGAS and go with the HOME DOG. If you have to play Seattle, go soft. Seattle will probably win the game, but I'm not sure about covering the spread. Hard to believe but that's how it goes sometimes.......
You actually think the games are fixed. It doesn't matter how much vegas doesn't want to pay off the public again the facts are rams are in turmoil they cant stop the run and cant move the ball at all. Take it from a person from st. Louis rams lose by at least 21 in this game.
Big Dog - Just wanted to make myself clear, I did not indicate that the games are fixed like some of the other cappers believe. I do think the the odds makers are good at what they do. Anyway, like I predicted, Rams made the spread and Seahawks won the game.
Posted:
#125
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:
The Seahawks are good enough by 15 in this spot (or so says my computer). Actually, Bradford was not too bad this season steering the ship.. Since Bradford is out, and Brett Favre decided he had one too many concussions,plus the figures are based largely with Bradford in the lineup, this bet has some appeal. Actually, it's the Rams "D" that sucks!
SEATTLE - 13
ITS NOT THE RAMS DEFENSE THAT SUCKS ITS YOU AND YOUR COMPUTER !!!! LMFAO !!!!!
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.